UNITED
NATIONS - Barbara Bush's published memoir left
a distinct feeling that neither he nor George
H. W. were all that thrilled by the experience
when
he was ambassador to the UN. Did some of those
negative impressions of a brief time in Manhattan
-- few US delegates stay long, as a lengthy list
of names honoring past occupants of the office
on First Avenue testifies -- rub off on George
Jr.?
The
current President Bush did a smooth job of massaging
delegates' egos while at the same time issuing
some sharp reminders they might have preferred
not to hear in his recent address to the UN General
Assembly, which was mostly about Iraq and what
the Organization needs to do to shape up and meet
the perceived threat from Saddam Hussein. Even
some erstwhile critics admitted it was quite a
tour de force. Stunning, one said.
Since then, Bush has
spoken often about
the United Nations,
slurring the words
according to his familiar
Texas speech pattern
which somehow adds
a perhaps unintentional
impression of a put-down.
Be that as it may,
the message is clear:
the US wants action
and if the UN is to
be relevant in today's
world it had better
deliver. John D. Negroponte
and Jeremy Greenstock,
the US and UK ambassadors,
currently are crafting
a resolution they hope
the Security Council
may adopt and that
then will make Saddam
sit up and take notice.
Secretary General
Kofi Annan, whose recent
stance Iraqwise has
not been quite as tough
as some in Washington
might wish, has been
scurrying back and
forth hoping to be
helpful.
There
was a big stick behind
Bush's carefully
constructed remarks
at the UN and Annan
and his aides have
to worry when the Organization's
most powerful member
uses words like "ineffectual
debating society" when
mentioning the UN and
what it could sink
into unless somebody
stops the rot.
The secretary general
just came out with
a report on what he
thinks can be done
to make his institution
more effective.
One important recommendation
to delegates is just
to shut up. They talk
too much. Incredibly,
no fewer than 15,484
meetings were held
during 2000 and 2001.
Also, Annan advises
they should stop demanding
all those secretariat
reports. In that same
period, there were
5,879 of them. Who
on earth could possibly
read all this stuff?
Yet the UN keeps on
grinding it out in
six languages, including
Chinese which only
one member state understands.
"We must take
a critical look at
all our activities
and ask ourselves whether
they are relevant to
the implementation
of the Millennium Declaration
[adopted by heads of
state, including Bill
Clinton, in 2000] and
whether they have made
the desired impact," Annan
writes. "And if
the answer is no, we
must be willing to
let go."
Mary Robinson was
recently let go after
a distinguished tenure
as UN High Commissioner
for Human Rights. After
Sept. 11, she and the
US didn't see eye to
eye over America's
treatment of terror
suspects, including
those incarcerated
at Guantanamo Bay.
Washington was not
unhappy to see her
depart, past President
of Ireland though she
is. Now Annan talks
of a need for improving
UN performance in human
rights. A Brazilian
expert on refugee problems,
Sergio Vieira de Mello,
is Robinson's successor
as High Commissioner.
One of the cushiest
jobs in the system
is director of a UN
information center
in a foreign capital.
It confers privileges
that often are not
far short of those
that ambassadors receive
routinely. Getting
a center posting is
a great sinecure for
superannuated diplomats
with or without public
relations expertise
-- mostly, be it acknowledged,
without.
Annan proposes to
close down 71 centers
and transfer their
responsibilities to
regional offices, beginning
with one for Western
Europe. Governments
of some small countries
that like the idea
of having a UN information
center and in many
cases are willing to
pay the freight for
it will squawk for
sure. So don't be surprised
if Annan has to compromise
a bit.
The
secretary general
plugs for the besieged
Organization in his
report, observing that
the need for an efective
multilateral institution
dedicated to the service
of all humanity has "never
been more acutely felt
than in the current
era of globalization."
The challenge, he
remarks, is to strengthen
the ability for collective
action and thus forge
a common destiny at
a time of global change.
Footnote: A recent
Notebook about Germans'
fears that an angry
US will drop support
for a permanent seat
for Germany in the
Security Council in
response to the recent
rhetorical excesses
of Chancellor Gerhard
Schroder omitted to
mention that they likely
will get a Council
seat anyway for the
next two years, under
a regional rotational
system for elected
members. Expect Joschka
Fischer, the charismatic
Greens leader and foreign
minister who already
is seeking to ease
Bush's bruised feelings,
to come to New York
during Germany's month
as Council president,
in February.
|