DURBAN--In some countries
racism is a quick look-maybe a bad joke. In others
people get fired, or never hired. And then there
is institutionalized racism, which can go as
far as taking land from farmers and food from
mouths.
It
was this last scenario that concerned a small meeting
organized by Habitat International Coalition (HIC),
an international Nongovernmental organization (NGO),
at the Coastland Conference Center on Tuesday. At the
panel a statement of cooperation written by Miloon
Kothari, Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, was
read by Davinder Lamba, the panel's moderator and head
of the HIC delegation to the World Conference against
Racism (WCAR).
Three scenarios were discussed, with a common
theme of the dominant culture systematically destroying
the villages and displacing the peoples of the
minority cultures. Probably the most contentious
issue, as paralleled throughout the WCAR all week,
was that of the Israeli-Palestinian situation.
"At this point, the state of Israel blames
the Jewish National Fund, being the principle authority
in this, and the Israel land authority, who claim
that a bit more than 93 percent of the land in
Israel is state land or owned in perpetuity for
Jewish nationals and most estimates claim that
about 70 percent of the lands of the occupied West
Bank and a third of the Gaza strip and also parts
of occupied Jerusalem have likewise been claimed
for Jewish nationals," said Joseph Schechla,
a representative of HIC who has been working with
the Palestinians for 15 years.
Two Israeli citizens
were present at the meeting, representing an
NGO. "Israel has a real problem
with racism in the sense that the representatives
of the state of Israel cannot defend the state
of Israel because Israel does not have a constitution," said
Shula Koenig of the People's Movement for Human
Rights Education (PDHRE). "I think the representatives
found it very difficult to defend in any way the
exclusion of the state of Israel. One should separate
between the state of Israel, Zionism, and Judaism,
and that I don't think happened in the convention."
"Israelis and Palestinians are basically
playing cards in the hands of the US delegation.
Basically, the US did not come to Durban because
she did not want to face the issues of slavery
and reparations. By using the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict and actually, I think, also intentionally
inflaming it, they've managed to repress the whole
issue of slavery and reparation altogether," Koenig
said.
Both Shula and Schechla agreed that if the evidence
of Israeli racism had only been put into terms
as the facts and figures of lands confiscation
and displacement of peoples, rather then getting
mired down in Zionism, the argument would have
been much more effective.
It is such arguments
that HIC is helping NGO's to put to China, a
recent signatory of the International
Covenant of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights,
to argue against the occupation of Tibet. "The
problem in Tibet is that even people who are generally
concerned with the environment or cultural issues,
they were punished for creating an unstable environment
and destroying the unity of china," said Sonam
Dagpo, Department of International Relations of
the Exiled Tibetan Government. "These crimes
were very severe so if you did find anyone speaking
of housing or land they would be arrested or imprisoned." The
covenant names housing as a human rights, and HIC
is trying to help local Tibetan NGOs, most based
in Dharamsala, India where the Dalai Lama resides,
to use the legal framework to help protect Tibetans.
In Turkey the situation
is not so easy; the Kurdish people, the largest
displaced people in the world,
are stretched across Iraq, Turkey and Greece. But
Turkey, like Israel, say Kurdish NGOs, systematically
destroys Kurdish villages uprooting an already
displaced people. "Thirty Kurdish villages
were destroyed by the Turkish government for the
sake of tourism, they said. Thirty big towns-more
then three million people displaced by the Turkish
government," said Nazmi Gur, Migration and
Humanitarian Aid Foundation.
One of the issues not discussed on the panel was
land reform in Zimbabwe, where it has had some
of the bloodiest results of late. In Zimbabwe,
like many other countries in sub-Saharan Africa,
a minority of whites owns the majority of the land.
In Zimbabwe the issue has been postponed many times
by since independence in 1980 from England. Last
year the government under President Robert Mugabe
began encouraging blacks to openly take the land
back from the whites, inciting a series of high
profiled murder and beatings of white farmers.
"Well you must know that in some places in
Africa land reform is going very, very badly," said
South African Nobel Literature Laureate Nadine
Gordimer. "I mean look at Zimbabwe, it's an
absolute tragedy. But you must remember that they've
had 21 years to begin to do it in a peaceful and
reasonable way and they apparently did nothing,
they waited until we got to a crisis point, people
have said all these years have gone by and we haven't
gotten our land back."
Another issue that
she sees as a problem to land reform is the lack
of training of potential black
farmers that the return of land would require. "Many,
many people have been in urban areas for generations.
They have no idea how to farm anything. If you
put them on that land it's just going to become
an unproductive slum. Some people, many people,
want urban land, housing land where they can live
and work. Admittedly agricultural land must go
back to the people, but you need to have big training
schemes, the children and grandchildren of those
who owned the land could say, Right I want to be
a farmer this was our land, we're getting it back,
now I want to learn how to run it productively," said
Gordimer.
But again the problem
of race sometimes overshadows the problems of
land and economics. "We support
President Mugabe," said Viola Plummer, an
NGO representative from the Durban 400, a group
representing people of African descent in North
America and the Caribbean. "We support the
people and the government of Zimbabwe to take back
their land. How many black Africans were killed
in Zimbabwe from 1998 to 2001? Has there been since
independence from 1980 till 2001 has there been
one white farmer, policeman, scout, tried and convicted
for killing one black person? So this double standard
doesn't apply to whites killing black farmers."
Often it can be a conundrum, does forgiveness
come first and then peace and prosperity? Or can
peace and prosperity foster forgiveness? In Zimbabwe,
as in Tibet, Turkey, and Israel these issues must
be sown together.
|