| JOHANNESBURG--The
high-level segment of the World Summit for Sustainable
Development-the "summit" part of it-opened
Monday with renewed pleas for rich-poor solidarity
and calls for turning words into action. At the
same time, though, it was becoming apparent that
the consensus on environment and development
that was forged at the Rio Earth Summit 10 years
ago
was not going to be strengthened here in Johannesburg-and
in some significant ways had been weakened. Perhaps
most significantly, the opening session produced
fresh evidence that the deep-seated mistrust between
North and South, exacerbated by the rich countries'
acknowledged failure to honor the commitments they
made in Rio, remains a serious impediment to solidarity.
In his
opening address, South African President
Thabo Mbeki, who is also president
of the summit, spoke of the possibility
that this meeting might be remembered
as "a defining moment that will
live forever as the midwife that brought
into our world the child that humanity
conceived at Stockholm and Rio de Janeiro
and brought up during a period of gestation
that has encompassed the UN Millennium
Summit and other important international
conferences held since 1992."
He said
this summit must speak with "a
strong and united voice that says, Now
is the time to act!" It must, he
said, deliver a message that "we
are ready and prepared to be judged not
by the number and eloquence of the resolutions
we adopt, but by the speed and commitment
with which we implement our agreements
that must serve the peoples of the world.
Nothing, whatsoever, can justify any
failure on our part to respond to this
expectation."
United
Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan
said the summit's hopes are embodied
in one word: responsibility. "Responsibility
for each other-but especially the poor,
the vulnerable and the oppressed-as fellow
members of a single human family. Responsibility
for our planet, whose bounty is the very
basis for human wellbeing and progress.
And most of all, responsibility for the
future-for our children and their children."
But Annan
also called upon the assembled heads
of state to "face an uncomfortable
truth: the model of development we are
accustomed to has been fruitful for the
few but flawed for the many. A path to
prosperity that ravages the environment
and leaves a majority of mankind behind
in squalor will soon prove to be a dead-end
road for everyone." Ironically,
his words took on added meaning because
of the setting of the summit-an ultra-luxe
first-world enclave surrounded by shabby
townships filled with poor people living
in squalor-people who have seen no real
improvement in their lives because of
the Rio summit. In many parts of Africa,
people have seen their standard of living
fall during the past decade.
In his
address, Romano Prodi, President of
the European Commission, acknowledged
that "progress has been slow since
Rio," but he called on the summit "to
forge a fresh pact between North and
South on the basis of trust and our shared
goal of sustainable development. This
pact," he continued, "is about
growth, development, sustainability and
solidarity." But Sam Nujoma, President
of Namibia, lashed out at the European
Union and Great Britain and accused them
of worsening his country's poverty. He
called on the EU to lift its sanctions
against Namibia. And he called on the
British to do something about the fact
that they own 78 percent of his country's
land.
As the
ministers negotiating the text of the
summit's "Plan of Implementation" document
worked to resolve the last few remaining
disagreements, analysis of the agreed
paragraphs showed that the Rio principle
of "common but differentiated responsibility" -of
the rich and poor countries to protect
the planet-had survived an attack by
the US, but that other "Rio principles" have
been watered down or otherwise diminished.
For example, what had been known as the "precautionary
principle" is now called the "precautionary
approach."
A detailed
analysis of the text by Friends of
the Earth International gives it a
score of 22 out of a possible 100. It
notes that the text contains "no
new finance or aid targets ¼ old
ones are not mentioned, neither is any
package on debt relief."
|