| JOHANNESBURG--As
leaders from nearly 200 governments gather in Johannesburg
for the World Summit on Sustainable Development,
there is growing awareness that development, to
be sustainable, must raise the living standards
of the poor.
But
development and antipoverty programs will ultimately
be ineffective if nature's life support systems are
badly degraded. The statistics in Africa dramatically
illustrate the link between poverty and environmental
degradation around the globe, the dimension of the
challenge, and the opportunity to remedy them together.
Nearly 40 percent of Africans live below
the poverty line. About 70 percent of
them live in rural areas and depend on
agriculture. Yet the basic resources
for their existence are threatened by
desertification, which affects 65 percent
of agricultural land, and deforestation,
which in the relatively short period
of 15 years has stripped 66 million hectares.
Devastation
of the land and resources-Africa's "silent
menace"-weighs heaviest on the poor,
who, in a vicious cycle, reinforce it
through unsustainable use of natural
resources.
This
silent menace is a real concern beyond
Africa. It is part and parcel
of the task of preserving global biodiversity
and maintaining forest "carbon sinks" to
offset the Earth's increasing emissions
of greenhouse gases that affect climate
change.
On the positive side, development institutions,
governments worldwide, and the private
sector are increasingly recognizing the
link between poverty and the environment.
Ten years ago at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit,
the nations of the world adopted an agenda
for addressing global environmental deterioration.
The Global Environment Facility (GEF),
of which I am the CEO, was established
as the only new international financing
mechanism to address four critical threats:
climate change, disappearance of biological
species, degradation of land and water
resources, and ozone depletion.
In partnership with the UN Development
Programme, the UN Environment Programme,
the World Bank, and other international
and regional lending agencies, GEF has
launched projects in 52 African states,
provided $656 million in grants, and
leveraged 2.5 times as much ($1.688 billion)
in cofinancing. Overall, the GEF has
committed $4.2 billion in grants with
an additional $12 billion in cofinancing
to support environment projects in 160
countries.
Many
GEF projects emphasize new economic
opportunities for rural farmers and residents.
In Ethiopia, farmers, with the help of
extension agents, are building community "gene
banks" and developing better seed
selection and management practices. In
Botswana, Kenya, and Tanzania, dryland
farmers learn sustainable rangeland practices.
In Mali, where firewood is the chief
household fuel, GEF projects promote
biomass as an alternative fuel and help
conserve 720,000 hectares of natural
forest. GEF also brings together African
coastal nations to mitigate pollution
threats to fishing and tourism activities
vital to creating jobs and bolstering
their economies.
With so many poor and hungry people
in Africa and other developing regions
dependent on natural resources for their
livelihoods, we must make a concerted
effort to ensure that these resources,
especially land and water are used sustainably.
And the need for action is urgent. Because
of the current downturn in the global
economy, 15 million more people, according
to a World Bank estimate, could fall
into poverty, thereby adding to the pressure
on the land.
During the last decade the development
community has made a significant start
in addressing the poverty/environment
link. It has proven that development
need not degrade the environment nor
bypass the poor. Done properly, it can
also reduce conflict and foster stability,
trade, and investment opportunities.
But a much more robust effort is required.
And the World Summit on Sustainable Development
offers the opportunity for governments
and the private sector to increase their
contributions to sustainable development.
Undertaking that increased investment
may seem difficult with other pressing
threats facing the world. But the costs
of inaction will be felt not only in
our lifetime but also for generations
to come. August 2002
|