|
UNITED
NATIONS--On Monday October 8, one day
after America's first strike against
Afghan targets, eight Nobel Peace Prize
laureates offered a written appeal to
United Nations Secretary General Kofi
A. Annan, pleading with the UN to pursue
peaceful means of resolution.
"We
are greatly saddened by the tragic events
which took place on Tuesday, September 11th,
in New York and Washington DC," the
first paragraph of the statement reads. "We
cannot yet fathom the magnitude of what has
happened, and yet we feel impelled to speak
in light of what we fear may be an escalation
of violence in response."
The statement was written at least eight days
ago, when the US and its allies were still
issuing demands to Afghanistan's ruling party,
the Taliban, and its guest, terror mastermind
Osama bin Laden. On October 8, four of the
eight laureates gathered at the UN Church Centre
for a press briefing before their meeting with
the Secretary General.
The eight laureates were: 1976 Nobel Prize
winner Mairead Corrigan Maguire, 1976 Nobel
Prize winner Betty Williams, 1980 Nobel Prize
winner Adolfo Perez Esquivel, 1984 Nobel Prize
winner Desmond Mpilo Tutu, 1989 Nobel Prize
winner Tenzin Gyatso -- the 14th Dalai Lama,
1992 Nobel Prize winner Rigoberta Menchu Tum,
1995 Nobel Prize winner Joseph Rotblat and
1997 Nobel Prize winner Jody Williams.
Rigoberta Menchu
Tum, Guatemalan Nobel Peace Prize winner
in 1992, said she is asking for
solutions other than war. "We are here
to ask the UN to promote peace," Tum said
through a translator.
She made a reference to Guatemala -- where
a 36 year guerilla war killed 100,000 people
and created more than 1 million refugees --
and said she wouldn't know where to start to
get justice for the victims of terrorism in
Guatemala. Warfare, she said, is not the answer
and she appealed for international law instead.
"We come to demand the International
Criminal Court," Tum said, claiming she
lobbied for the creation of the ICC to deal
with terrorism for years.
Tum said the
world should not be sucked into a major war
and she disagreed with President
Bush's line in the sand approach to the conflict. "Now
you hear two voices," she said, slapping
the stand. "There needs to be another
voice that says, 'We are not for terrorism,
but we are not for war either.' "
Mairead Corrigan
Maguire, Irish Nobel Peace Prize winner in
1976, called America's retaliation "sad." Her
voice crackling and her hands trembling, Maguire
said her heart was "heavy" about
the bombing and America's subsequent food drops.
"The double approach to bombing and dropping
food is unacceptable," she said. "It'll
be winter soon there and pretty soon it'll
be impossible to get food to the refugees and
then they will die. And the West won't see
them dying."
Maguire called it ironic that the US government,
which had tried to make peace between England
and Ireland, is now in the midst of a war itself
and is bringing the rest of the world in its
conflict.
"We went through a cold war and we cannot
go through another cold war because of the
greed and arrogance of the American government," Maguire
said. "The UN is the best organization
will have, God help us. They speak for the
human family, not the US government."
The World Council of Churches, who sponsored
the event, released a statement attributable
to its Acting Secretary General in Geneva,
Georges Lemopoulos.
"The initiation of bombings and missile
attacks against Afghanistan last night, while
not unexpected, is nevertheless of profound
concern to the World Council of Churches," the
statement reads. "We abhor war. The first
WCC Assembly in 1948 called it a sin against
God and humanity. We do not believe that war,
particularly in today's highly technologized
world, can ever be regarded as an effective
response to the equally abhorrent sin of terrorism."
The letter
goes on to say that the Council will "pray for those who live under the
bombs and missiles, hoping against hope that
they will be spared" and that all the
nations "turn away from the temptation
of the sword" and strive for justice.
The common theme at the gathering was that
there are root causes of terrorism which need
to be understood and worked out. War, the common
theme goes, is never the proper response.
"One thing is clear," Esmeralda
V. Brown of the United Methodist Office for
the UN, told the Earth Times, " is that
when you start bombing people, it's not going
to resolve a situation."
Brown said she enjoyed the panel because it
contained Nobel Prize winners from Guatemala
and Ireland, countries that have suffered terrorism.
Brown said that because she's from Panama,
she also knows what it feels like to have bombs
reigning down on her country. In a case as
extreme as the World Trade Center attack, Brown
said, America should still show restraint because
they don't know who the enemy really is.
"So let's
look into the root causes of the problem
and see how this can be resolved
so that it is never repeated again, not here
in the United States, not in any other country."
When asked
if people who hate America as much as to
send commercial planes into skyscrapers
could be reasoned with, Brown again called
that example "extreme" and said she
strongly believes that the world should unite
not only against those type of people but also
the governments of those countries who view
terrorism as legitimate policies to terrorize
their own citizens.
She stopped
short of advocating war however. "I
would hope that out of this experience that
we do not select what's terrorism or not terrorism
based on our friendship with certain governments."
|