Lord
Swraj Paul of Marylebone came to Britain
in the late 1960s from his native Jullundhar,
India, to seek medical treatment for young
daughter, Ambika. He stayed on in London
after Ambika succumbed to her illness,
and proceeded to build a fortune in the
steel, hoteling and manufacturing businesses.
In 1996, at the age of 65, he was made
life peer. His company, Caparo, is now
run by his children. Educated in both India
and in the United States, Lord Paul has
also been one of Britain's most prominent
philanthropists. In the House of Lords,
he's now working on a report on globalization.
Following are excerpts from a recent interview
in London:
How
would you sum up your life in Britain?
I didn't come to Britain to live here. I came
here for a very personal reason of treatment
for my daughter. The thing which I found most
interesting about Britain is that if you are
prepared to work hard and if you are prepared
to work as the local people do, you have wonderful
opportunity. And in spite of all what gets
talked about--the question of racialism, or
this or that--there is lot of opportunity in
this country. In 1996, I was asked to be a
member of the House of Lords, which was a great
privilege for anyone but especially for a person
whose family was involved in the Indian freedom
struggle, one who got his name Swraj (freedom
in Hindi) because that was the slogan of the
Indian Congress Party during the struggle against
the British.
What were the special ingredients that explain
your business success?
I think the main thing is that whether you
are prepared to face a challenge. People here
thought that the steel industry was a thing
of the past, that Britain cannot produce things
competitively. I found that not enough money
had been invested in modernizing plants. I
thought up ways to increase productivity. The
same thing with manufacturing. I knew that
Britain would need a manufacturing business.
It was a belief that perhaps by doing it by
another method I might succeed. You also need
a lot of luck. And that's what happened. And
because I was successful in doing that, people
respected that. And that gives you extra encouragement,
especially when the host country starts valuing
your work. There will always be ups and downs
in life, but one must not lose heart.
How did you become involved in politics?
I had the privilege of knowing the late Indian
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who, in my view,
was one of the greatest politician of the 20th
century. She once offered me the Indian High
Commissioner's post in London, but I respectfully
declined. I wanted to stay on in manufacturing.
Still, I was always in the game because of
that knowledge of politics gained from Mrs.
Gandhi. I had really the absolute ringside
seat. I joined Labour in 1974 because of their
belief in social justice and their belief that
a very sound manufacturing industry was needed
in Britain. I stood by them. After being made
life peer in 1996, I got deeper into British
politics than I had ever intended or thought
of in my life. In 1997, I was asked to become
ambassador for British business, which takes
me around the world to promote British investment,
British trade, waterways, exports, imports,
inward investments, outward investments.
What's it like being a member of the House
of Lords?
There
isn't another institution like the House
of Lords.
It's a nominated house. Under conventional
democracy, it shouldn't be there at all. But
from what I have seen, it is the most democratic
house at the same time in the world. Because
all of us are nominated for life. And nobody
can remove us from there. So this gives you
the freedom to be able to say what you wish
because you don't have to worry about, "Do
I have to fight an election after four years?
No law in this country can be passed without
the approval of both Houses, the House of Lords
and the House of Commons. Some of the bills
keep shuttling between House of Commons and
House of Lords for days together. And years.
So, House of Lords really make amendments to
those bills to make sure that the common man's
interest is looked after. The requirement from
all of us is if we want to attend it, we attend
it. If we don't want to attend it, there is
no sanction again it. We don't get paid. we
only just get an allowance from the day we
attend, which is really your money for transport
and tea. You are doing this as a voluntary
service giving the benefit of your experience.
Being here teaches you a tolerance for the
other people's bills. Everybody speaks passionately
and strongly. Every time you go there, you
feel humble.
You were among the very first to urge greater
liberalization and transparency in the Indian
economy. Are you satisfied with how things
have worked out?
I got heavily criticized when I first started
talking publicly about corporate accountability
and economic liberalization. But since 1991,
everybody jumped on the bandwagon of opening
up the economy. They're still talking about
it, though they haven't gone for as much reforms
and transparency as they should have and they
could have. And in my view, the earlier they
do it, India will gain more. India should be
far higher in the hierarchy of the world's
development nations. We have nothing to be
embarrassed about concerning the ability of
our people to achieve. It has certainly given
me lot of satisfaction that perhaps I had some
little part to play in the change. But the
change has definitely come.
Are India's economic growth and social development
increasingly going to be a test of national
character?
National character will always remain the
top matter of any country's progress. The biggest
problem of developing countries -and now, even
some of the developed countries--is corruption.
And that corruption has to go. If you see the
progress of nations, you can almost draw a
graph between corruption and their development.
I think that corruption is the number one enemy
hindering sustainable development. Corruption
will get only removed by competition and by
liberalization and transparency. Plus the people
in power need to understand that human values
also have to be created in the public. A social
responsibility has to be there. People have
to care about other people. We got to improve
of our education. We got to improve other responsibility
as citizens. That is why we have been taking
up the subject of environment in the House
of Lords. People think environment is only
the climate. Or some people think environment
is something which some other country should
bother about, not us. Environment is a total
concept. Environment is also, in my view, about
how you behave with your fellow beings. How
do you behave with your children? How do you
behave in your business? How do you react to
each other? To me, that is total environment.
And that has to be cleaned up.
|