|
MELBOURNE,
Australia--Werasit Sittitrai is the Associate
Director for UNAIDS in
Asia, Pacific and the Middle East.
UNAIDS is the joint AIDS program of eight
United
Nations organizations. A dedicate advocate
for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment,
Sittitrai has been fully involved in
ICAAP. He rushed from meeting to meeting
everyday, but managed to find time
and a smile for those who wanted to talk
to him. The following are excerpts
from
an interview:
What
role has UNAIDS played in the running and organizing
of ICAAP?
UNAIDS is one of two major co-sponsors of ICAAP
along with the AIDS Society for Asia and the Pacific.
We have been involved in the organization of the
last three ICAAPs and will be involved in Kobe,
Japan in 2003.
Our contribution has been in all aspects. We took
part in the discussions on the scientific program,
community program and positive forum program as
well as the composition of the plenary session.
We also contributed to the theme of the conference
and how to translate the theme into different messages.
In addition UNAIDS also sponsors a number of sessions
which address critical issues and key areas. An
example is a session on the success story of Cambodia.
We organized that and brought in different ministers,
NGOs and other partners. We sponsored the session
of First Ladies--who made a strong commitment to
a response, especially in relation to the vulnerability
of rural women. We also sponsored a session with
parliamentarians who pledged to mobilize their
peers and constituents as well as to look into
the changing of domestic laws and policies.
What is the significance of addressing issues
such as Gender and Sexuality which are generally
considered taboo and not talked about in the region?
I believe that
it is critical to address these so called "sensitive issues" in
the region. For UNAIDS these are not sensitive
issues, they
are important and critical issues that we need
to address in order to advance a response to the
epidemic. We always encourage and promote organizations
which address these issues in their countries.
We also encourage politicians and national leaders
to make tough political decisions in admitting
that those issues exist in their country. These
need to be brought into the discussion even if
they have to confront traditional views. These
include sexuality, gender inequality, condom promotion,
harm reduction among injecting drug users, indigenous
and minority issues, mobile populations and prices
of drugs.
What is UNAIDS' position on access to drug therapy
and the cost of these drugs?
UNAIDS negotiates with pharmaceutical companies
to get the drugs as cheaply as possible for developing
countries. We strengthen the role of the community
and people living with HIV/AIDS with the government
to be able to put their needs and demands in negotiation
in terms of getting a good price. We also help
to build capacity in terms of implementing the
treatment.
Does the Ministerial Meeting really show political
commitment? Is there going to be a change on the
ground?
This meeting organized by the Australian government
is by itself evidence of very high level and strong
commitment from the countries. Over 30 ministers,
not just health ministers, set aside the work in
their own countries and came here. They have discussed
openly how to advance the response, not only in
their own country but also in the region. I attended
the meetings and I heard every single minister
pledge their commitment in a very strong way which
I never heard before at this level. Quite a number
also put a target for those commitments publicly
in front of their peers. They said they would go
back and address sensitive issues. They all agree
on the declaration of commitment and the discussion
on the statement didn't take very long. Of course
when a commitment comes one wonders if resources
to support it will follow. But, for instance, the
Vice-Minister for Health in China said that China
will increase the national budget on HIV/AIDS.
Donor governments there also pledged their support.
Looking at the success stories of Thailand and
Cambodia they felt much more confident that whatever
the situation is in their country they can really
make a difference.
How much progress has been made since the 5th
ICAAP in Kuala Lumpur?
I can cite a few achievements since the 5th ICAAP.
Of course one of them is the success story of Cambodia
as a country. We are very proud that this region
has two success stories--Thailand and Cambodia.
And I truly believe that at Kobe we'll be able
to announce another success story and that's a
goal we have to work toward.
There is consensus that the epidemic is spreading
in this region even though it is at a lower level
in some countries. There is definitely a sense
of urgency. We see more recognition of vulnerable
populations like indigenous people, minorities,
sex workers, injecting drug users and men having
sex with men.
And what are the goals for the next two years
till Kobe?
There are still a few barriers that we need to
address. That includes access to prevention for
many people in many countries, access to treatment
and care and support. We have to strengthen health
care, but also community and home care support.
Because in this region family and community care
is the really important thing. So I think it's
good that in December there will be the International
Home and Community Care conference in Chaing Mai
Thailand. It's the first time it is organized in
a developing country. That will also help linking
this ICAAP and the next in terms of home and community
care which is the basic structure of care in this
region. In western countries you go to hospitals,
in this region it's the community and home.
We still have a lot of work to do in terms of
access to treatment and care, however we felt that
in this conference the recognition of the role
of people in the community as well as people living
with HIV/AIDS was very strong. It's the first time
that we have a forum specifically for people living
with the virus. There was also greater collaboration
such as the attendance of ministers from different
ministries. The organization of the coalition of
regional NGO networks, called the 7 sisters was
also an achievement.
I think another achievement is in getting resources.
The Australian government has pledged commitment
and support, as well as other donors. I believe
that with the Global Health and AIDS fund more
resources will be available.
In terms of political commitment--at the UN special
session in June there was some commitment. At this
conference you hear that people saying that no
Asia-Pacific head of government went to the UN
GA and that message will be brought home. With
the ministerial meeting I think in the near future
we will see more awareness, attendance and commitment
from the heads of government. We're looking forward
to the ASEAN head of government summit in November
in Brunei at which they have a special session
in AIDS for the first time in history.
I hope that in Kobe there will be a high level
of participation possibly from First Ladies again,
heads of government and definitely from ministries.
I think it's good news that Australia is planning
to host the next ministerial meeting in two years.
What countries in the region are most at risk
of a large scale epidemic? Potentially if they
don't do any expanded response in an intensive
way--we talk about Vietnam, Indonesia, India and
of course we talk about Myanmar as well. These
are the countries we are concerned about. China
as well, even though prevalence is in pockets around
urban areas, because of the size of the population
the numbers are high.
Minister Downer pledged money to harm reduction
for injecting drug users and there have been many
sessions on this topic. How will this increase
support for prevention and treatment for injecting
drug users?
I think in the past the issue of injecting drug
use and HIV/AIDS was not well addressed in this
region. It is very important in terms of the spread
of HIV through sharing needles. The vulnerability
and stigmatization around drug use is high and
they could not come out to receive services or
express their needs and demands. I think in this
ICAAP we have achieved a major step in awareness
and recognizing that HIV spread among injecting
drug users is a priority to push forward.
Unless we address this issue from both the prevention
of HIV side and also the stigma and discrimination
side we cannot make a difference in terms of controlling
the epidemic in this region. So again, congratulations
for the success that came out of both the Ministerial
Meeting and the ICAAP. Pushing awareness and commitment
to this issue has to continue. There's still a
lot of work to be done to push harm reductions
policy to many governments who don't have favorable
positions and also implementing programs that involves
planning, decision making and participation of
drug users.
What are the key factors in advancing HIV/AIDS
prevention and treatment in the region?
First is to get
political commitment at the highest level. At
the next ICAAP it would be wonderful
to announce that so-and-so country now has the
Prime Minister or President chairing the National
AIDS Committee. Secondly, for many countries to
announce that their national AIDS program involves
many ministries other than health. Of course health
plays a key role, but ministries of labor, education,
interior and agriculture have to be involved. They
have to come up with a major role, have their AIDS
plan and budget to reach the population. The aim
is to implement intensive prevention programs within
a short period of time to cover all the population.
Another key to success is large scale implementation
of programs. You can have a thousand success stories,
but not much change in the course of the epidemic
unless you cover at least half the country or the
whole country. Reducing stigma and discrimination
is a major obstacle. Even if you have care and
support facilities no one will come out if there
is stigma. That is why some of the community groups
say our motto should be "My son with AIDS
is still my son." Cooperation between countries
in terms of exchange of experience is important
as well as peer support among politicians and leaders
and an increase in government budgets. These are
some of the things that everyone knows about and
are common sense, but we have to get out and do
them.
|