|
WASHINGTON--The
terrorist attacks in New York and at the
Pentagon last month are already exacting
a steep price on the economies of the United
States and other industrialized countries,
forcing massive layoffs and shaking consumer
confidence. But the most devastating economic
effects of the attacks may eventually be
felt in the developing world, according
to a recent report by the World Bank.
In
its preliminary assessment of the global economy
since the attacks of September 11, the Bank
said slumping economic growth in the United
States and other OECD countries will reverberate
throughout the developing world, forcing as
many as 10 million people into poverty, to
join the 1.2 billion who already subsist on
less than $1 a day.
"We have seen the human toll the recent
attacks wrought in the US, with citizens from
some 80 nations perishing in New York, Washington,
and Pennsylvania," World Bank President
James Wolfensohn said. "But there is another
human toll that is largely unseen and one that
will be felt in all parts of the developing
world."
The impact of this economic crisis on health
care and nutrition could have disastrous effects
on children, the Bank said. It expects 20,000-40,000
children under the age of five to die as a
result of the economic consequences of the
attacks.
According to the World Bank's report, the
main problems facing emerging economies are
depreciating commodity prices, the flight of
foreign aid and capital, and increased costs
of trade due to security restrictions and customs
delays. The hardest hit sectors will be tourism
and agriculture.
Some experts caution that it may still be
too early to discern the true economic impact
of the attacks, especially since a global economic
slowdown was already underway prior to September
11 and the data necessary to draw confident
conclusions are not yet available.
"Nearly all our economic data are for
the period before the attack," said Dr.
William Dickens, a senior fellow in Economics
at the Brookings Institution. "We have
almost no idea how the attack has affected
the US and world economy."
But the attacks have already had a noticeable
economic impact on countries in which tourism
accounts for a significant portion of GDP.
In the Caribbean, 65 percent of holiday reservations
have been cancelled. Nepalese authorities have
reported 50 percent cancellations of hotel
bookings. Countries in the Middle East are
also expected to suffer from the travel droughts
that have been brought on by increased concerns
about airport safety around the world.
The effects of the attacks on the agricultural
export sector will be equally grave, as commodity
prices fall and US demand for foreign commodities
shrinks.
"For economies that are dependent on
commodity exports, particularly for cotton
and beverage exporters, this portends a large
terms of trade shock over and above the impacts
of slower growth in GDP," the World Bank
said.
Average commodity prices will decline even
more this year than the previous projection
of 7.4 percent, the Bank said. Agricultural
futures are already down 5 percent since the
attacks. With the potential of a sinking US
dollar threatening to depress US demand further
by making imports more expensive for Americans,
the outlook is not good for farmers and laborers
associated with the agricultural sector, who
are expected to suffer substantial income losses.
"The developing world will be disproportionately
affected because both the prices and quantities
of the exports of the developing world tend
to be more sensitive to demand than the typical
exports of the developed world," Dr. Dickens
said.
The attacks are expected to drive a teetering
US economy into recession and deal another
blow to an already stalling global economy.
"There is broad agreement that the terrorist
attack will push the US economy into recession
and the global economy into a period of slow
growth," said Martin Baily, senior fellow
at the Institute for International Economics,
in an October report on the attacks.
Slowing growth in rich countries is expected
to ripple through to poorer countries. Before
September 11, the Bank was projecting a growth
rate in emerging economies of 2.9 percent in
2001 and a rebound to 4.3 percent in 2002.
Following the attacks, the Bank has revised
its estimates, projecting rates of 3.5 percent
to 3.8 percent in 2002, because it will take
longer than expected for developed countries
to recover from their own economic malaise.
This model assumes that business will return
to normal by mid-2002 and that the combination
of prudent monetary policy and restored confidence
in security will buoy consumer confidence.
Continued military action, experts say, may
exacerbate the economic slowdown by fostering
uncertainty and shaking consumers' sense of
security. But a swift military campaign that
is ineffective in restoring global security
may be even more dangerous for the economy.
According to
Dr. Dickens of the Brookings Institution, "an
end to military action that left concerns
about the long run security
of the world in doubt could be more detrimental
than a long term military campaign that produced
tangible results suggesting improved long-run
security."
The World Bank said different countries would
experience different economic problems as a
result of the attacks. The hardest hit countries
will fall into recession and experience a rise
in the number of their citizens living in poverty
next year. Other countries may sustain positive
growth, but they will be unable to lift any
of their citizens out of poverty.
While all regions will be affected, Africa
may be facing the gravest crisis, the Bank
said. Falling incomes and sluggish markets
for key commodities like cotton, cocoa, and
coffee could combine to drag another 4 million
to 5 million people into poverty in the next
year.
"The 300 million people in Africa are
particularly vulnerable, because most countries
have no safety nets and poor households have
minimal savings," said Eric Chenje, one
of the Bank's Africa experts.
With population growth hovering around 3 percent
in Africa, economic growth has to keep pace
to keep per capita incomes from falling, which
many economists say can be disastrous in economies
without social safety nets.
Asia will fare slightly better, but the optimism
among economists that Asian countries might
finally be recovering from the financial earthquakes
that ravaged their economies in 1998 has dissipated
in the last several weeks. The Asian Development
Bank issued relatively optimistic forecasts
earlier this year, but has revised its projections
for Asian economies in the wake of the attacks.
The areas of Central Asia being targeted in
the US military campaign are exceptions in
that they will be particularly hard hit.
Dealing with this crisis will prove a formidable
task, the World Bank noted, but one that must
be undertaken together by rich and developing
countries.
"Policy responses have to be swift and
somewhat bolder in rich and poor countries
because of the heightened level of risk to
the global economy," World Bank Chief
Economist Nicholas Stern said.
The Bank called for increased foreign aid
from developed countries and another round
of trade liberalization to help mitigate the
problems developing countries face.
Foreign aid to the developing world has been
decreasing in recent years after a decade of
increasing levels. At about .22 percent of
the GNP of most OECD countries, current levels
of aid are not sufficient to stave off a new
wave of poverty, the Bank said. Increased bilateral
and multilateral lending to developing countries
will reduce their reliance on private foreign
capital for their financing needs.
"The evidence from the Bank's work on
aid effectiveness demonstrates that well-directed
aid, combined with strong reform efforts, can
greatly reduce poverty, and can also mitigate
particular effects of crises," the Bank
said.
Reducing international trade barriers is an
equally important step in rehabilitating the
economy. The Bank said another round of trade
liberalization could yield $1.5 trillion in
income to developing countries in the next
decade.
Martin Baily
of the Institute for International Economics
sees it as a prerequisite for recovery. "Emerging
economies benefit from globalization and will
suffer if its progress is slowed," he
said.
The Bank concurs
that loosening trade restrictions, especially
in areas of agricultural trade,
will play a crucial role in jumpstarting the
economies. "Maintaining trade is more
important than ever, especially in the face
of an economic slowdown which is often accompanied
by pressures for increased protectionism," Chief
Economist Nicholas Stern said.
The World Bank also said more efficient and
coordinated financial policy by the world's
economic powers could stabilize the global
economy, and that developing countries need
to continue to make the internal reforms necessary
to strengthen their economies.
|