|
Dr.
Satish Boolell is a forensic pathologist
working in Mauritius. For the past three
years he has served as president of the
Mauritius Council on Social Services, or
Macoss, the umbrella organization for all
nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in
Mauritius. He also serves on the President's
Education Council. Dr. Boolell sat down
one afternoon near his autopsy lab at the
hospital and spoke to Conference News Daily
about what he considers the two greatest
challenges to development in Mauritius:
education and retirement. Excerpts from
the interview:
What
programs do you have involving children?
When the convention for the protection of
children's rights came along I was quite surprised.
I was a member of the National Children's Council
and, at the time, Mauritius was one of the
first countries to rush to sign it, but as
far as implementation is concerned I think
we were dreaming. Mauritius is a small country.
We're not like mainland Africa trying to fight
for democracy. In Mauritius we inherited a
welfare state from the British that has been
maintained by successive governments. Now we've
always had free primary education, and for
the last 25 years free secondary education.
We have a heavily subsidized tertiary education.
If you look at it from the angle of the welfare
state you have everything free; all you need
to do then is take care of the side problems
to ensure that what is free is implemented,
to ensure that you do not have children on
the streets.
What are these side problems?
The obstacles are with our housing problems
and our levels of the work force. Very often
children aren't sent to schools because there
is a lack of kindergartens available that would
enable the mother to go to work and leave the
children there. So what happens? In a specific
example, a mother with three children will
not send the children to school because she
has to go and work, and the other oldest child
has to stay at home and take care of the other
two. And once you break the cycle the child
is no longer fit to go to school.
Are there any solutions that you are working
on?
Solutions? The solution given to me by politicians,
the one that organizations like Unicef make
you swallow, is the convention on the rights
of children. But the problem that we have with
children is not in the law; we have the laws.
It's not in the convention. Actually the problem
is that we have too many laws and too few methods
of implementation of the laws. If a child doesn't
go to school, what do you do, arrest the parent?
You can't do that because you cut off the breadwinner
to the family.
What about placing the children in foster
homes?
Recently somebody
has learned somewhere about this word called "care." So foster
parents are being looked for. We are going
to come up with a plan for foster parents,
having no idea how it works. "Fostering"--we
do not have it in this place. All we have is
sometimes we have a psychologist. Is it better
for a child to have bad parents than have no
parents at all? I put you in the care of foster
parents and you might like it. It might be
good. You might be happy, but in the absence
of foster parents, if I take you to a shelter
where you become an anonymous member of the
shelter, you lose out, you phase out. And if
the shelter is not equipped to take care of
your education by the time you are placed in
a home somewhere, or placed with relatives
who are willing to take you for cheap labor
(because you'd be doing odd jobs around the
house) you lose out on education--which for
me is the solution to all these problems. Access
to education and not giving access to education
to children from the deprived areas is something
that we are all guilty of. Otherwise you maintain
the ghetto.
What happens to those dropouts?
Child labor.
We specifically don't want to know what's
happening to these children. Go
to any market, any of the open-air markets
selling vegetables, and see how many children,
in this country where primary education is
compulsory, are on the streets today and what
action is taken. Like I always tell people
I do not like government to make me a present
of problems it cannot solve. This is not my
role. As chair of Macoss I am supposed to be
chairing the umbrella organization with a view
of the implementation of policies in the different
sectors. Right now there is something on aging
going on and I packed a few people and sent
them out there to talk about aging. Last year
I talked about aging more then anything else.
This year I'm turning to the handicapped. I
try not to follow the UN in its implementation
of the yearly "this is the year of the
volunteer." I kind of do things according
to what we feel are the needs of this country.
I was quite shocked yesterday to see on TV
that the Prime Minister is receiving many of
our brothers from mainland Africa; they are
going to discuss aging. Is there anything as
controversial as aging on mainland Africa?
There's no such thing. And they've come here
to discuss aging, so everyone wants trips out
of their own country, trips for the boys: conferences,
seminars.
What can you tell us about the problems facing
the elderly in Mauritius?
The problem with aging is that we have 10
percent of our population in their 60s. We
have so far been relying on the relatives,
on the family, to take care of the old. We
have very, very few public retirement homes.
Now we're getting the English disease, which
is a proliferation of private homes. You see,
in Great Britain after they closed down a lot
of the hospitals or mental hospitals, all of
a sudden all those people who were out of a
job opened up their homes as retirement homes.
You have now in Mauritius a proliferation of
private retirement homes, which are charging
the eyes of the Earth as far as taking care
of the elderly. We have been embarking in a
Program to ensure that the prices of these
homes are well defined--whether you want to
have five-star status or one-star status or
whatever. The people should know how much they
have to pay. Recently we discussed pensions
with the World Bank because we need to have
a comprehensive aging policy on employment
after retirement, on the education of the elderly,
on retirement homes, on access to facilities
for the elderly.
Does Mauritius have social security?
We have social security help for specific
cases, people who are visited by doctors and
feel that they need some help. What we have
is a uniform pension for everyone who is over
60--whether you are a pauper or a millionaire
you receive 1,500 rupees [about $150] per month
when you retire. I'm trying to say there should
be two types of pensions: one type for someone
who already has a pension and another, higher
one for those who never contributed anything
to their pension before. In the factory they
earn about 4,000 or maybe 5,000 rupees [$400
to $500] per month. But if Granddad is a pensioner
earning 2,500 rupees [$250], nobody will get
rid of him, and this will reduce the demand
for old age homes. Granddad will be welcome
in the family circle because his salary will
help to pay for things around the house, so
he'll be able to help take care of the children
around the house. This will help to maintain
the family system, which has been destroyed,
and to restore it, especially in the inner
cities. There will be no need to keep your
8-year-old daughter at home to mind the babies
of 2 and 3. If you manage that way for a couple
of years then you can send your 8-year-old
to kindergarten and then on to school because
that's the only way out of the rut.
|