DOHA,
Qatar-Getting 189 countries to agree on anything
is a real achievement. It was a doubly welcome
response, therefore, to the tragedy of September
11 when both the UN General Assembly and the
Security Council unanimously condemned the
terrorist attacks that changed the world.
Now
there are signs that Osama bin Laden's subsequent railing
against an alleged anti-Islam crusade in retaliation
for the tragedy may be falling on deaf ears or failing
utterly to impress many among the world's estimated
1.2 billion Muslims. This despite widespread concern
in the West over noisy calls to jihad against established
governments.
Bin Laden appears only to have compounded earlier
exaggerations with his latest intemperate remarks
about the UN, its loyal, law-abiding Arab member
states and the organization's Nobel Peace laureate
Secretary General Kofi A. Annan, whom he called
an international criminal in a videotape delivered
from al Qaeda's Afghanistan mountain hideout and
broadcast by the satellite TV station al Jazeera.
Prior to the postponed
General Assembly ministerial debate that finally
got under way Saturday with
a keynote address by President George W. Bush-and
will continue through next Friday-the world body
marked the UN Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations
with statements honoring and emphasizing what unites
humanity. The participants, including Annan, rejected
attempts like those of bin Laden and his backers
to promote divisions and sow discord among the
world's differing ethnic, religious and cultural
groups. Ironically, this special commemorative
year was designated by the General Assembly at
the initiative of Iran, which the US State Department
still characterizes as a "rogue state" and
supporter of international terrorism.
Judging from remarks attributed Saturday to Iranian
President Mohammed Khatami in an interview with
The New York Times, his first with an American
publication, the Iranian government is not as black
as it's been painted by some Washington critics.
Could it be that the time is approaching when the
White House and State Department may want to reconsider
their public postures on Iran?
Khatami, a Muslim
cleric, told the Times that he doesn't believe
that bin Laden's message "really
resonates strongly in the Muslim world." In
his subsequent UN address, the Iranian leader called
the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon
the work of a "cult of fanatics who self-mutilated
their ears and their tongues and could only communicate
with perceived opponents through carnage and devastation." Islam's
message is one of peace and it should not be blamed
for movements that are extremist and terrorist,
Khatami insisted.
US Ambassador John
D. Negroponte hailed the Iranian initiative,
calling it "important and welcome." Negroponte
cited September 11 as "the antithesis of all
that we would hope to achieve in a dialogue of
civilizations, if by civilization we mean a mode
of communal existence that expresses a people's
finest qualities and greatest gifts and blessings."
A danger confronting
the world today was not that "we
speak in different languages, but that we don't
always listen in any language," he said, adding
that the art of hearing one another and responding
to what was said were "the fundamental dynamics
of dialogue." "In our globalized world," he
continued, "we should encourage, not hamper,
the free flow of ideas. We should respect, not
push aside, the values and beliefs of other cultrures.
And now it is time
for us to look into the fire yet again and bring
the best qualities of our civilizations
to bear on our problems. Not the worst."
|