DOHA, Qatar-The accession
of China to the World Trade Organization
in Doha is the greatest leap in the history
of the WTO, said the European Union's Trade
Commissioner Pascal Lamy. But after 15
years of what he called "difficult" negotiations
as China reformed its economy, the implications
and obligations membership places on the
world's most populous nation are expected
to have a major impact on China and its
trading partners.
Chinese
accession is the greatest leap in the history of the
organization," Lamy said when he formally welcomed
Shi Guangsheng, China's minister of foreign trade and
economic cooperation, into the WTO fold this week.
Speaking as the representative of the world's biggest
trading bloc, Lamy had earlier warned Beijing that
Europe would be monitoring Chinese trading policies
very closely from now on.
"This has been a long and arduous negotiation,
one that took a full 15 years to complete. In retrospect,
the history of the last 15 years of negotiations
has also been the history of China's own reform
process, its gradual opening up, and its integration
into the world economy. The phenomenal seven percent
compound average annual growth rates, which are
expected to continue in the future, testify to
the success of the government's economic policies," Lamy
said in a welcoming speech this week delivered
as the representative of the 15-nation EU, the
world's biggest trading bloc.
For a country with 1.2 billion people China, represents
one quarter of the populations of the 144 WTO nations.
The terms of accession mean that China will be
legally bound to abide by the full range of market
access obligations that apply to member nations.
Known as schedules of commitments, these obligations
cover tariffs and non-tariff measures applicable
to agricultural trade and industrial goods and
services. WTO officials said Beijing had been required
to set out how it promises to fulfill these obligations
relating to its current and planned trade and investment
regimes during the first years of membership.
"These temporary derogations from normal
WTO rules are intended to reflect the unique challenge
of incorporating China into the world trading system," an
official said. "This is an economy in the
midst of transition from state ownership to the
market-based system; a country that has taken many
measures to introduce market economics, but where
certain features of a state led economy still prevail.
Most notably, the protocol affords other members
special protection for their own industries against
damaging surges of exports from China."
For the major Western
trading powers in Europe and North America, and
the rest of Asia, China's
entry, he said, would signal an enormous gain in
enforceable rights with no significant change in
their own commitments toward China. In turn, the
only obligation other members of the WTO have is
that they must accord China so-called permanent
MFN, or "most favored nation" status.
In the case of Chinese trade with Europe, for example,
it means the phasing out of remaining textile import
quotas and other China-specific trade restrictions
by the year 2005.
A European expert
on the trading relationship with China, said
Beijing had made a high standard
of commitments to open its economy to foreign imports,
investors and businesses. "One of the reasons
the talks lasted so long was the concern of the
EU and others that China's entry should in no way
lower the average standard of openness to trade
in the WTO," the official said. As for the
benefits, these include vastly improved access
of other member nations to the Chinese market.
Import tariffs and other non-tariff restrictions
will be sharply and permanently reduced. And investments
by foreign companies will take place in a more
attractive, more predictable business environment.
Bill Jordan, Secretary-General
of the International Confederation of Free Trade
Unions (ICFTU) said
China would be monitored closely on its application
of workers rights under the new WTO regime. No
longer, he said, should Chinese products produced
by underpaid laborers be allowed onto the market. "How," he
asked, "can goods produced in India carrying
the price of democracy compete with exports from
China which are cheaper because Chinese workers
do not enjoy the same rights?" A question
European officials said they were confident could
be overcome as China becomes more open and benefits
from EU technical assistance.
|