DOHA, Qatar-Just hours
before the scheduled end of the World Trade
Organization (WTO) Ministerial Meeting
in Doha, Qatar, a visibly angered and agitated
African diplomat, speaking for some of
the poorest countries on the planet, said
in effect that they had been double-crossed
by the rich ones, would not sign the final
agreement, unless they got some redress.
The
issue was bananas, and not AIDS drug patents that had
threatened to wreck the conference earlier in the week.
Hegel
Coutier, a spokesman for the African, Caribbean
and Pacific
(ACP) group, but also representing
the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and the Organization
of African Unity (OAU) raised his voice and trumped
the table at a press conference as he condemned
what he said were "rich countries" reneging
on at least 18 months of promises of special privileges
that poor African countries have in exporting food-largely
bananas.
He said Honduras was blocking the special waivers
that the poorest countries enjoy from strict interpretation
of WTO agreements, which generally call for no
special treatment for anyone.
"For at least 18 months, we were told 'no
problem, you will get it.' But two days before
Doha we realized we weren't getting it," he
said.
A special WTO waiver has allowed the poorest African
countries to export bananas into the European Union
under a special arrangement that was due to be
phased out in 2006. Latin American countries have
strenuously objected to the waiver that effectively
crimps their sales.
The
United States has acted as an honest broker among
all sides,
holding a series of meetings last
week with Latin American and African diplomats.
Coutier said the Europeans worked out a deal with
Latin American countries that would involve some
arbitration agreements in case of market loss,
and that it was accepted by most of the Latin countries
Monday night. "But on Tuesday Honduras rejected
it," he said.
"We demand that they respect their (original)
commitments," he said. "We are not part
of the problem. After 18 months the WTO can't keep
its commitments?" he asked.
He
said African and other poor countries are now
being asked
to completely and instantly open their
markets, upon rich countries' request, and added: "No
country in the world developed in an open trade
environment.
That
was neither the case for the United Kingdom and
United States
in the 19th century, nor was
it the case for Japan in the 20th century." Claiming
to speak for dozens of countries, he said, "We
cannot sign the final declaration until we get
our guarantees."
Kenyan
trade minister Kipyator Biwott told the joint
ACP, OAU, LDC
press conference that the waiver
was "crucial, a matter of life and death.
We do not believe that it is right to deny the
ACP countries the right to have a continuance of
the preferences that were already given."
Asked
if the issue would totally block any agreement
from the Doha
WTO meeting, he said, "there
is a possibility for failure if other delegations
do not accept a compromise."
Iddi
Mohamed Simba, said that the poor nations represented
at Doha
noticed a "fairly well
coordinated maneuver on the part of developed countries
to launch a new round" of WTO negotiations-"the
first since 1986"-which less developed countries
almost unanimously oppose. "We are not really
technologically or financially ready to deal" with
a new round, he said.
On the patent issue, Nigerian commerce minister
Mustafa Bello said that the countries believed
the final language would have allowed poor countries
to protect public health in the face of foreign
drug patent problems, and, that assuming that were
the case, the patent problem would not block a
final agreement.
"As of now," he said, looking at his
watch, "We do not believe that we have a problem
with TRIPS (Trade related aspects of intellectual
property rights).
Asked
about the so-called "Singapore" issues
of investment and competition policies and government
procurements, Biwott said that the African nations
were against including them in a new round or even
discussing them in Doha, but they lost on that
issue too.
However,
he said the poorer countries would accept a new
round
if it included the concept of "serialization," which
would help the less developed countries to pace
their participation.
Summing
up for his colleagues before returning to the
negotiations,
Simba said "the draft
final declaration does not reflect very clearly
our fundamental needs."
All
three of the ministers at the press conference
lauded the
efforts by American diplomats to solve
the banana issue, and all three denied that any
pressure was put on any party by the US officials. "That
time has passed," Bello said.
|