The crash Monday of
an American Airlines Airbus A-300 jetliner,
only minutes after takeoff from New York's
John F. Kennedy International Airport,
jolted delegates at the United Nations
just when some of them were starting to
show the first telltale signs of deja vu
now that it's two months since the terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon.
Although
indications were that the aircraft, with 255 people
on board, came down in a tragic accident that has no
connection to terrorism, the White House said officials
were being "very cautious about any conclusions." They
refused to rule anything out, President George W. Bush's
spokesman said. The flight recorder was recovered and
is being analyzed, according to reports.
Mayor Rudolph Giuliani told reporters 151 bodies
were recovered and that six persons were missing
on the ground, presumably residents of the houses
that were hit when the airplane hit the ground.
First accounts told of an explosion or fire on
board the doomed Domican Republic-bound aircraft
before it crashed onto a service station in the
dormitory borough of Queens, some five miles from
JFK and only miles from the UN. None of the 246
passengers and nine crew survived, according to
initial information. This would make it among
the worst such accidents of recent years.
The flaming wreckage started fierce fires in
four homes in the crowded residential community.
At least 15 people on the ground were injured.
More than 200 firefighters and 40 fire trucks
were called to the scene.
Despite the apparent absence of any terrorist
link, officials ordered a partial lockdown of
UN headquarters, for security reasons. New York
area airports and Manhattan's bridges and tunnels
were closed for several hours. The UN campus lies
in a direct line from the site of the crash and
was itself declared a terrorist target when the
World Trade Center was car-bombed in 1993.
Only last week
Osama bin Laden said the UN is a harbor for "infidels" and called its
Secretary General, Kofi Annan, a "criminal."
The lockdown, which was relaxed after about 90
minutes but not entirely lifted, kept US Secretary
of State Colin Powell penned inside the already
closely guarded building, along with French foreign
minister Hubert Vedrine and other top diplomats
visiting New York for a Monday meeting of the
Security Council on terrorism and a continuing
high-level session of the General Assembly. President
George W. Bush made his UN debut in the General
Assembly Saturday.
Both of the scheduled UN meetings went ahead
Monday, but many alarmed delegates from all over
the building crowded around television sets to
catch news reports and view images of the burning
wreckage of the aircraft and surrounding houses
minutes after word of the crash swept through
the conference halls and corridors.
There was a palpable sense of relief that the
crash, tragic though it was, appeared in the initial
analyses to have had no terrorist link or or to
have resulted from a simple hijacking of the kind
that used to be all too common when passengers
and crew would suddenly find themselves forcibly
destined for Cuba. Fidel Castro stopped those
capers, seldom injurious, by arresting the hijackers
on arrival in Havana.
The fact that
Monday's crash was of a French-built Airbus
owned by American Airlines was a new blow
to that carrier. One of its Boeing jetliners was
taken over by terrorists who crashed the plane
into a tower of the World Trade Center in the
worst such incident in history, which resulted
in the loss of thousands of lives. What is clear
from this first major air crash since then is
that, post-Sept. 11, any civilian airplane accident,
anywhere, must immediately arouse suspicions of
what is now termed a "terrorist event."
The ministerial-level debate at the UN, which
was postponed because of the World Trade Center
and Pentagon attacks and attendant security risks
for foreign visitors, finally got underway this
past weekend. At once, it revived attention on
the phenomenon and threat of terrorism.
This did seem to be wavering a bit as delegates
had begun to focus on some other pressing questions
on the international agenda. Kofi Annan himself
drew attention to the fact that terrorism is not
the only global problem, when the world still
must grapple with the dire effects of poverty,
promote sustainable development, guard against
environmental degradation and fight the scourge
of HIV/AIDS, which has taken not thousands of
lives, but millions.
Still, it is terrorism that was the dominant
theme of Bush's address to the General Assembly
and that has figured largely in virtually all
of the subsequent speeches by heads of state or
foreign ministers, including President Pervez
Musharraf of Pakistan, who has become a crucial
ally of the US as the military campaign continues
in Afghanistan.
Annan has repeatedly
declared that excusing terrorists by calling
them freedom fighters, or some such,
will not wash. "Terrorism is terrorism," said
the world's latest Nobel Peace laureate. In the
current debate, that message seems to have acquired
some resonance. While there have been the usual
ritual diatribes against Israel, which some members
accuse of conducting a form of "state terrorism" against
the Palestinians, no one so far has seriously
defended the suicide bombings and other outrages
that have become a frequent response in a continuing
conflict over the occupied territories.
Meanwhile, the jury still is out on the possible
existence of future terrorist actions and how
to thwart such threats against the US, the UN
or those states that have lined up in the coalition
against bin Laden and al Qaeda.
Richard Butler, who led the UN inspection teams
seeking to ensure the dismantling and destruction
of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction-an operation
suspended by Saddam Hussein's objections to it-is
convinced the Iraqis maintain a potential for
bioterrorism, chemical warfare or even nuclear
action and that this could be their eventual military
objective. For his part, Annan has said that for
the coalition to expand the current war to include
an attack on Iraq would be a recipe for disaster.
As of now, Powell is thought to agree with him.
But there are hawkish voices among Bush's advisers
who may have other ideas.
Meanwhile, there
are persistent reports, including in an interview
that bin Laden gave to the Pakistani
newspaper Dawn, that the al Qaeda chieftain may
already have acquired weapons of mass destruction. "I
wish to declare that if America used chemical
or nuclear weapons against us, then we may retort
with chemical or nuclear weapons. We have the
weapons as a deterrent," he said, according
to the newspaper's account.
The US and the
UK were expected to release late this week further
evidence of his involvement
in the Sept. 11 attacks. Despite his earlier denials,
it now is reported that in a videotape he calls
the towers of the 102-story World Trade Center,
a famous downtown Manhattan landmark now lying
in ruins, "legitimate targets."
The London newspaper,
The Sunday Telegraph, published excerpts from
the videotape over the week-end
in which bin Laden said that if avenging the killing
of "our people" is terrorism, "then
history should bear witness that we are terrorists.
Yes, we kill their innocents." It is against
this backdrop that the alarm bells rang anew at
the UN Monday, after the A-300 crash.
|