In March of 1961 I boarded
a freighter in Galveston, Tex., that was
bound for Italy, and almost unwittingly
embarked on a career as a foreign correspondent.
Forty years on, with retirement beckoning,
the memories of events that shaped part
of the history of that period remain as
fresh as today's news.
There
was the afternoon in June 1967 that I spent climbing
up the Golan Heights, watching Israeli soldiers pull
defeated Syrian troops out of foxholes while the smoke
from artillery shells still rose from the soil. Then,
days later, I stood at the Allenby Bridge and watched
shattered Palestinian families by the thousands cross
into Jordan and exile.
There were the
two occasions on which I was arrested by the
KGB,and threatened with expulsion from the
Soviet Union, for the crime of photographing demonstrators
in Moscow. When I later complained to a KGB official
who masqueraded as a Soviet diplomat that Russian
correspondents were free to cover demonstrations
in the U.S., he smirked and replied amid howls
of laughter from his subordinates: "We will
see to it that you are free to cover demonstrations
There were the months in which I was followed ostentatiously
everywhere. I went in Cairo by a secret police
agent, then awakened repeatedly by 3 AM phone calls
from someone who never spoke, a way of letting
me know I risked serious trouble if I kept reporting
on the former Nazi rocket scientists who had been
hired by Egypt to build missiles for use against
Israel.
There were the weeks of dodging bullets, sometimes
by inches, during the Iranian revolution, and the
searing experience of seeing one of my close friends,
Joe Alex Morris Jr. of the Los Angeles Times, killed
alongside me on the penultimate day of the revolution.
For months afterward I relived that experience
in a kind of obsessional waking nightmare.
There was the white-knuckle ride aboard a Soviet
helicopter that brushed mountaintops in Afghanistan,
firing off flares to try to divert any heat seeking
missiles that mujahedeen fighters below might fire
at us. All the while I wondered if I would suffer
the ignominy of being killed by an American weapon
in a Soviet war machine.
There was the Afghan
official who, at the end of a long interview
on a now-forgotten subject,
turned to me and addressed an earnest entreaty: "Tell
me, what percentage of what I've just told you
do you believe?"
There was the near-fatal experience on an Iranian
military transport plane at Bandar Abbas, carrying
77 coffins of people killed when the U.S. Navy
mistakenly shot down an Airbus airliner. The coffins,
improperly strapped down, began toppling over and
bodies spilling out as the plane sped down the
runway. The pilot barely stopped in time to avoid
a takeoff that he later admitted would have ended
in a crash.
There was the day I followed Queen Elizabeth II
on foot to the sources of the Blue Nile in the
Ethiopian highlands, with Prince Philip flailing
at the accompanying photographers with a riding
crop. That same evening, at a regal banquet hosted
by Emperor Haile Selassie, I became memorably so
used on tej, a brew made from fermented honey whose
potency I had seriously underestimated.
There was the stunning scene on an evening in
1991 when I witnessed thousands of Kurds stumbling
in a broken line down a mountainside in Turkey
from towns and villages in Iraq, driven out by
poison gas attacks by Saddam Hussein's army. Then
the heart-breaking days in which they huddled on
open ground, pelted by rain and beginning to die
by the scores, before American cargo planes brought
deliverance from the sky.
There is the still-fresh image of houses burning
in Kosovo, sullen and defiant Yugoslav troops departing,
scenes of massacres the water dried up and the
toilets did not flush for four days.
Can it really be 40 years since I stumbled, wide-eyed
and unprepared, into the sometimes funny, sometimes
tragic, mesmerizing world of the foreign correspondent?
I had gone to Rome
in 1961 for what was to be a year-long adventure
in Europe, a carefree lark
between serious career moves. Although I have had
fleeting sojourns in Chicago and Washington since
then, I have, in a sense, never left. "Abroad" became
my home.
>From Rome I
eventually moved on to postings in Cairo, Belgrade,
Moscow, Brussels, Nairobi,
Berlin and London. The datelines on my stories
have come from 80-odd countries on four continents,
as far apart as Spitzbergen in the Arctic Circle
and the Falkland Islands in the South Atlantic.
It wouldn't be true to say there has never been
a dull moment, but for the most part this has been
a privileged life on the front line of history.
I have covered eight wars, the revolution in Iran,
civil conflicts in Northern Ireland and the Basque
country, the death of two Popes and the election
of two others, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the
death of Princess Diana.
I have even endured countless Michelin three-star
meals, and put numerous luxury hotels to the test,
all in the line of duty. And I once stayed in a
hotel in Kampala, Uganda, in which the only running
water was a greenish slime that came from fire
hoses that some obliging Congolese prostitutes
staying in the hotel helped me drag to my room
to fill the bathtub. Sheets that had not been changed
in weeks were black with grime and littered with
the remains of bedbugs that presumably had succumbed
to the unsanitary conditions.
Before I left America, I had at the age of 25
covered for the Arkansas Gazette what I was confident
would be the biggest story of my career, the Little
Rock school integration crisis. I could not have
imagined what lay ahead.
I began writing this article in early September,
with a brief to describe ways in which the world
has changed since I first came abroad. After the
attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon,
every other development of the last 40 years seems
to recede into a shadowland of insignificance.
Yet. the changes that preceded September 11 are
still with us, and it is not an easy task to draw
a coherent picture of how they have made the world
either better or worse. I can only describe what
I have seen.
The 100-year cycle that recently ended has rightly
been proclaimed the American Century, and the apex
of that glorious period in our history more or
less coincided with my arrival in Rome. America
was then far more admired in the world than it
has been in recent years. The memories of World
War II, and of the turbulent years that immediately
followed, were still fresh. The U.S. had saved
the world from the Nazi menace, then from Communist
attempts to subvert Europe after the war. What
a great, idealistic nation we were. What enormous
gratitude we inspired.
More importantly for a young man who had accepted
a penurious salary to work on a small American-owned
newspaper in Rome, this was a wonderful time to
live abroad because the dollar was king. I could
dine in some of the better restaurants in Rome
for $5 a night or less, and that wasn't just because
everything was cheaper 40 years ago. It was mainly
because of the immense purchasing power of the
dollar, now sadly just another of the world's leading
currencies.
Rome was not then the rich, bustling, chaotic
city it is today, but the more tranquil capital
of a poor country still recovering from the war.
Few people had cars; most of the cars were tiny
Fiats that seemed to be powered by lawnmower engines
and Italians careened through the streets on noisy
motorscooters even more than they do today. It
was a glorious place, and Italy remains for me
a kind of spiritual home.
It was a less-crowded world then, and to me that
is one of the most significant changes of the last
40 years, or at least as significant as the technological
revolution that is still unfolding. When I arrived
in Rome, the world population stood at 3 billion.
Today it is 6.1 billion and 50 years from now it
is projected to reach 9 billion or more. When I
moved to Cairo in 1964, its population was 4 million
and the city was overcrowded. Today it is 13 million.
Egypt's population was 28 million in 1964, 63 million
today and projected to reach 80 million by 2017.
Its people live almost exclusively along a thin
green strip on either side of the Nile in an otherwise
desert country, a terrifyingly narrow hold on existence.
Few developments have been more profound in their
manifold implications than the explosion in world
population. Degradation of the environment, global
warming, Third World poverty, mass migrations from
poor to rich countries, increasingly worrisome
shortages of water and lack of social cohesion
are all related in one way or another to the fact
the number of people in the world exceeds the world's
ability to cope. It is a story that we in journalism
tend to cover in piecemeal fashion, seldom pulling
together the disparate threads of this burgeoning
problem and tracing them back to a common root.
At moments such as the current one, it may be
easy to forget ways in which the world has changed
for the better. Yet the Soviet menace is gone,
Europe is whole and free again and undoubtedly
the most exhilarating experience of my career came
on the night of Nov. 9, 1989, when I went to Checkpoint
Charlie in Berlin and found the world had turned
upside down. East and West Germans were embracing,
and people were sharing champagne with East German
border police who only days before would have been
prepared to shoot them. The Berlin Wall had fallen.
That night the world became a better place. Yet
human progress has never been traceable on an even
trajectory. AIDS, which didn't exist in 1961, is
today devastating an entire continent, Africa.
Organized crime in 1961 meant mainly Sicilian and
American mobsters, but that was before the mob
came to globalization; now organized crime is a
worldwide phenomenon and a $1 trillion-a-year business.
Drugs were just beginning to arouse serious concern
when I left the U.S., and were not something I
can remember people in Europe discussing at all.
Two years in Africa gave me an appreciation of
Third World poverty at its worst and of the resilience
of people who have not been favored by nature or
history. When I left Africa in 1981, I wrote a
series of articles that forecast a gloomy future
for the continent until at least the end of the
20th century. Twenty years later, the gloom has
lifted only in a few places.Africa has had its
Nelson Mandela, but it has also had Robert Mugabe.
It is still burdened with corrupt, incompetent
and sometimes psychopathic leadership, as well
as tribal division that, perhaps more than anything
else, ensures the struggle for a decent life will
be long and hard.
Europe, where I have lived most of my life, has
undergone a change over the last 40 years that
has been so slow and fitful that people tend to
ignore its significance and take it for granted.
But it is little short of a miracle that people
who have fought each other throughout their history,
and engaged in two ruinous world wars in a space
of 21 years, have forged a community of nations
that almost guarantees they will live forever in
peace I end my career, not as I would have wanted,
but amid the emotional wreckage of a newly shattered
world. I spent my childhood as a distant witness
to the violence of World War II, and the world
has not ceased to be a violent place since. The
things that frighten, worry and challenge us change
over time, and sometimes slip blissfully into chambers
of forgetfulness. But they are an ineradicable
ingredient of modern life, as has now become all
too tragically evident.
Terrorism had not, so to speak, been invented
in 1961 when I went abroad. Even before September
11, for all the tragic consequences that ensued
from it, terrorism was a phenomenon that most of
us watched from afar it but spared a sense of immediate
vulnerability to it. That form of terrorism had
a political purpose, to force its victims to negotiate
with its perpetrators, and that implied certain
boundary lines that could not be crossed.
The terrorism that Osama bin Laden has unleashed
is terrorism in a purer form negotiated. Only the
destruction of its enemies will satisfy its appetites.
That is undoubtedly the most startling, the most
shocking, change of the last 40 years scale none
of us could have imagined. They have truly changed
the world and, with their appearance, America's
curiously alternating history of engagement with
the world, then withdrawal from it, may have gone
forever. Or so I fervently hope.
American ambivalence toward the rest of the world
has been present through much of the nation's history
and manifested itself clearly after the Cold War.
Many Americans enthusiastically embraced the notion
that, with the Soviet menace gone, it was time
for the U.S. to focus on its own problems; it couldn't
be the world's policeman, or keep bailing out ungrateful
foreigners.
After the Falklands war between Britain and Argentina,
I encountered an American family living in that
far-off corner of the world who in a sense represented
in microcosm the American yearning to shut out
the world. Spooked by the conviction that a nuclear
war between the US and Soviet Union was inevitable,
they had gotten out a map and searched for a place
to live where they could be safe when Armageddon
arrived.
They had hit on a spot they had never heard of,
the Falkland Islands, and had moved there just
months before war came. As Argentine troops invaded
the islands, then Britons stormed ashore to liberate
them, this family hunkered down amid the gunfire
and learned something that other Americans are
having to learn now: The US and its citizens cannot
live in isolation from the world and its problems.
We are all one.
|