Designing and constructing
safe buildings has always been a primary
concern for owners, architects, engineers,
and project managers. With the threat
of terrorism on the rise, existing
design philosophies are being re-evaluated
in an effort to improve the safety
and survivability of buildings and
their occupants. One need not look
too hard though because, in fact, technology
presently exists that can increase
safety and security, and it originates
from an unconventional source - the
green buildings movement. Surprisingly,
many components of green buildings
technology actually go hand-in-hand
with increased building security.
The
concept of green (or sustainable) buildings is a relatively
new phenomenon in the U.S. building industry. Green
buildings are those that reduce energy use and associated
energy costs, reduce environmental impacts, improve
indoor air quality, and improve the health and comfort
of occupants. An ever increasing number of state governments
are realizing that green buildings are integral for
achieving long-term development, particularly in large
urban centers. Stimulated by a number of state and
federal incentives, green buildings concepts have come
into sharper focus within the design community.
Safe building designs have always required an
approach that anticipated and protected buildings
and their occupants and resources from a number
of threats, including vandalism, fire, natural
disasters, and a range of manmade catastrophes.
The bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma
City caused the federal government to reevaluate
security around buildings. Many roads near public
buildings, including the White House, are now inaccessible
to motorized traffic. But physical barriers are
not always practical or optional in some locations.
Therefore, a building's design, including its construction
materials and operational systems, must be the
first line of defense against attacks.
One of the first steps in designing a safe building
is to conduct a comprehensive threat assessment
and risk analysis. The assessment and analysis
identifies the assets or persons to be protected,
examines possible threats, and assesses the risk
of those threats. Once threats have been examined,
designers can select appropriate safety measures
depending on security requirements, acceptable
levels of risk, the cost-effectiveness of the measures
proposed, and the impact those measures have on
the design, construction, and use of the building.
Obviously, the intended purpose of a building will
dictate to a large extent the safety and security
measures instituted in the design.
The United States
General Services Administration (GSA) engages
in this sort of risk analysis each
time it seeks to design a building. However, safety
is but one factor the GSA considers. According
to the GSA's "Standards for the Public Buildings
Service," the GSA is also committed to incorporating
principles of sustainable design and energy efficiency
into all of its building projects. Sustainability
is a concept that seeks to design, construct and
operate buildings to reduce negative impacts on
the environment and the consumption of natural
resources. Sustainable design improves a building's
performance while ensuring better health and comfort
of building occupants. Although federal buildings
must be safe and secure, they are also designed
as much as possible to accommodate sustainable
designs.
Typically, a building's safety measures are selected
from three categories of methods: operational,
technical, and physical. To ensure a given facility
is protected from unwanted intruders, an operational
approach might provide for guards at all entry
points. A technical approach to safety involves
the use of surveillance cameras and/or the installation
of an alarm system. A physical approach involves
the use of locks and/or gates or other barriers
to block entry into all or parts of a building.
Safety and security measures are not just limited
to keeping people out of buildings, they are also
geared toward protecting building occupants. An
effective, secure building provides for mitigating
measures to limit hazards and prevent catastrophic
damage should an aggressor be successful. Safe
building design balances operational, technical,
and physical principles to achieve the best mix
for a given location.
Green building and safe building designs actually
share much in common. The major security functions
of the electrical system are to maintain power
to essential building services, especially those
required for life safety and evacuation and to
provide lighting and surveillance to deter criminal
activities. The main objectives of sustainable
design are to avoid resource depletion of energy,
water, and raw materials, prevent environmental
degradation caused by facilities and infrastructure
throughout their life cycle, and create environments
that are livable, healthy, and productive.
If a widespread
chemical or biological attack occurs that affects
ambient air, those buildings
with positive pressure ventilation systems and/or
high efficiency particle air ("HEPA")
filters will be the ones people seek for protection.
These particular ventilation systems are designed
to improve indoor air quality, but because these
systems can also prevent impurities from entering
a building or trap them if they do, they can also
make a life-saving difference in the event of a
chemical or biological attack. So long as the substance
can be isolated, a well maintained HEPA filter
installed as part of a building's heating ventilation
and cooling ("HVAC") system would even
be effective against the terrorists' weapon du
jour - Anthrax.
Of course, any mechanical device is only as good
as the power used to run it. Therefore, it is even
more important to install alternative power generating
systems, such as photovoltaics and fuel cells.
While these are typically thought of as purely
green components, they are equally applicable as
a safety and security measure. Simply put, the
longer mechanical systems, including HVAC and lighting,
remain operational, the more likely people will
be able to function inside the building or have
sufficient visibility to evacuate, if necessary.
Redundancy is often the key to survival. On a
modern aircraft carrier (often referred to as a
floating city), for example, if power is interrupted
because of a fire or explosion, the onboard system
finds a way to route power to the affected area
or to other areas in the energy grid from other
sources, so that the ship remains operational.
Buildings can be designed the same way. Unlike
modern aircraft carriers, buildings do not come
equipped with their own nuclear propulsion systems,
but designers can think of buildings as self-sustained
units in much the same way, and design them to
use alternative and self-sustaining power generating
systems.
While it is important to have self-sustaining
systems in place, their placement is another factor
to consider. Building owners and developers should
position these systems in a way that will provide
safety for the system itself. For example, if the
backup power system is located in an area most
vulnerable to attack, it may not be useful if an
incident occurs. The GSA is well aware of the need
for system protection and provides guidance on
the placement of systems and services (including
mail services) so as to protect those services
and result in minimal impact to the remainder of
the building and its occupants. The GSA advises
that equipment be located away from high risk areas
such as loading docks and garages. The system controls
and power wiring to the equipment should also be
protected. Equipment should be provided with stand-alone
local control panels that can continue to individually
function in the event the control wiring is severed
from the main control system. Again, while we may
not want buildings to take on the look of a military
command post or warship, certain of the military's
fundamental principles are applicable to building
designs.
The green buildings commissioning process also
provides a means to assess the mechanics of a building.
This process requires that an examination of all
mechanical plants be conducted to verify they are
installed and working properly to achieve peak
energy savings and air quality results. Whether
this process if formally used to obtain a tax credit,
other government incentive, or simply used for
information, the green building commissioning standards
provide a process by which building owners can
assess weaknesses in a building's mechanical systems.
A natural extension of the commissioning process
might be to evaluate whether a building would be
suitable as a safe haven from certain threats.
Building owners should seriously consider the
benefits of green technology as an available means
of making buildings more safe. As terrorism escalates,
tenants will demand a safe and secure environment.
At the same time, these measures will improve indoor
air quality and increase peace of mind, thereby
enhancing worker productivity. One of the many
benefits of going green is reduced energy consumption,
which ultimately results in less dependence on
foreign oil and other natural resources. While
nationwide energy saving results may not be measurable
for the foreseeable future, we should begin now
to make buildings cleaner, greener, and safer.
David J. Freeman
is the Chair of the Environmental Law Group of
the New York Office of Paul, Hastings,
Janofsky & Walker, LLP. He can be contacted
for more information at (212) 318-6555 or reached
by email at davidfreeman@paulhastings.com; Robert
L. Wegman is an Associate in the New York Office
of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP and
a member of the New York State Environmental Business
Association's Green Buildings Task Force. He can
be contacted at (212) 318-6499 or by email at robertwegman@paulhastings.com.
|