World population
will increase by double and reach 9.3
billion by the year 2050 adding tremendous
pressure to the environment, according
to a new report issued by the United
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
The
annual UNFPA State of the World Population 2001 report
released this morning, entitled "Footprints and
Milestones: Population and Environmental Change," examines
the close links between environmental conditions, population
trends and prospects for alleviating poverty in developing
countries. The report discusses the relationship of
poverty, over-population and environmental degradation.
"The projected population increase by 2015
will leave greater footprints on the earth," said
Thoraya Obaid, Executive Director of UNFPA, while
speaking at a audio news conference that announced
the release of the report. The press conference
also included speakers from government and conservation
organizations.
Citing statistics
from the report, Obaid said that even though
the total wealth of the world
is approximately $30 trillion, a majority of the
population lives on under two dollars per day.
She went on to say that the exploding population,
which currently stands at 6.1 billion, will put
a strain on natural resources. "The use of
fresh water will go up six fold in the next 70
years," she said. However, she added that
by 2050 half of the world population will be living
without direct access to fresh water.
"Population growth will stress the environment
to the breaking point," said John Flicker,
the President and CEO of National Audoban Society,
a conservation organization. He spoke of the importance
of international family planning. According to
Flicker it was a key environmental issue.
"Population growth is like a magnifying glass--
it expands all other environmental problems," he
said, explaining his organization's interest in
the report and the implementation of measures for
reducing population growth. As more areas get densely
populated species of plant and animal life also
get adversely affected.
Flicker said the worst still lies ahead as the
world now has the largest group of young adults
in the reproductive age bracket. In order to curb
population growth, he emphasized that significant
international family planning was needing.
Carl Pope, Executive Director of the Sierra Club,
felt as Flicker did that aid for curbing developing
countries' population growth laid in the hands
of their developed counterparts. Pope said the
Western world should do more in its part of to
aid developing governments combat the rapid rise
of population.
Pope went on to say that it was not only the developing
countries that were to blame for degrading the
environment. The Western world may have a lower
population growth however they have ignored what
is needed of them to preserve the environment.
He cited the Cairo Protocol as an example. In 1998
ministers and government experts from 100 countries
gathered in Cairo to discuss the progress of the
Montreal Protocol that was signed 10 years earlier
and discussed ways to reserve the damage caused
to the earth's protective ozone layer. According
to Pope, the developing countries are honoring
their commitments to this agreement however the
developed countries are not.
"Affluence has a tremendous affect on the
environment," said Pope referring to the report
that mentions the "consumption gap" that
exists between the industrialized and the developing
countries. Both increasing population and affluence
give rise to consumption, pollution and waste.
Increased poverty with a lack of resources and
technology also increase pressure on the environment.
Joseph Crowley,
a democratic congressman from New York, who is
also a member of the International
Relations Committee and a former member of the
Resource Committee, did not sound hopeful for the
fate of world population and environment. "Where
there is over-population there is environmental
degradation," he said. He too stressed the
importance of international family planning.
When Obaid was asked if there was any good news
in store for the world she said that the trend
of population is downwards, although it is not
at the stabilizing level that is needed. According
to her, this shows that progress has been made.
She said that men and women are having to make
choices that have never even been considered before.
|