|
Now,
is Arthur Cooper an educator, journalist, role
model, raconteur extraordinaire or bon vivant?
Answer: All of the above. Also, he's quite arguably
the most successful editor in American magazine
journalism. His GQ‹where he's been editor-in-chief
for nearly two decades‹is thick with ads,
even in these tight economic times. Its circulation
is more than 758,000 each month, with some 6.3
million readers who eagerly reach out for Cooper's
engaging brand of bold visuals and spicy articles.
During each year of Cooper's stewardship of GQ,
the magazine has turned a very nice profit indeed
for Si Newhouse Jr. and his privately held Condé Nast
Publications. In November 2000, for example,
Cooper produced an issue that ran 528 pages,
with 358
pages of rich, juicy ads. GQ's revenues for 2001,
according to industry sources, were around $125
million, of which $104 million came from ads.
In 2001, GQ's total number of ad pages was 1,748.
Such performance is no mean feat in an industry
that sports some 22,000 consumer and trade titles,
with new magazines sprouting every few weeks
to
compete for ad dollars. But
it isn't merely Cooper's ability to maintain GQ as
a cash cow for Newhouse that explains his longevity
at Condé Nast; equally important, he has created
an editorial sensibility that's influenced an entire
generation of American males. Men's magazines are
a particular volatile field, with titles turning
increasingly raunchy in order to entice readers.
Cooper‹who's not unfamiliar with skin from
his surreal year as Penthouse's editor a long time
ago‹doesn't have to resort to flesh to keep
his readers; their loyalty springs from the nice
mix of articles, service features and fashion spreads
that Cooper dishes up each month.
Readers
are also well served by Cooper's canny eye
for
spotting a big story when he sees it
and matching the right writer for the assignment.
Some years ago, in a conversation with James
Ellroy, he learned that the novelist's mother
had been murdered when he was 10 years old,
and that the killer was never caught. Ellroy
told Cooper that he'd been obsessed with that
murder. Cooper coaxed Ellroy into writing a
nonfiction piece for GQ‹the novelist's
first magazine article‹and the acclaimed
article eventually became a best selling book
in 1996, My Dark Places.
And
there is Cooper's knack for discovering what
he calls "new voices." He had
noticed the wine columns of Alan Richman at
Esquire, and persuaded him to move to GQ. Richman
soon developed into a formidable food writer,
with a voice that Cooper characterizes as "arrogant
and self-deprecating at the same time." Richman
has fattened GQ's cupboard of prizes with eight
James Beard Awards for Restaurant Reviewing.
That's eight in the last 10 years. (Cooper's
personal haul of awards is enviable, too. He's
won big ones such as Adweek's "Editor
of the Year.")
There is also Cooper's nurturing of young
in-house talent. Lucy Kaylin is a case in point.
She started off as an editorial assistant at
GQ. Under Cooper's tutelage, Kaylin began writing
celebrity profiles. Now there is general agreement
that she's one of the best writers in the magazine
business. Sonny Mehta, the president and editor-in-chief
of Alfred A. Knopf Inc., has often complimented
Cooper on his nurturing of unknown writers.
Kaylin,
Richman and Ellroy, of course, are generously
paid
by Cooper. (Word has it that
each makes upward of $100,000 at GQ.) But when
asked what special emoluments he offers to
writers who do particularly well, Cooper comes
up with a most unusual response: "Lunch
at The Four Seasons." Really? "Yes," he
says, "they all want to sit with me at
that banquette and observe that lunchtime theater
of celebrities and corporate tycoons. More
than anything else, writers want to be taken
by me to The Four Seasons." They also
want the choicest assignments. And since Sept.
11 last year, those assignments have included
what Cooper calls "the biggest story of
our time." But when he tries to "make
sense" of the story of America's war on
terrorism, he feels frustrated that, as a monthly,
his magazine can play only a supporting role. "We're
not setting the agenda," he said, "but
we can offer some perspective." And he
is making sure the magazine's writers are sticking
with the story.
Cooper recalled how he watched the Sept. 11
attacks on a television set in his office overlooking
Times Square, the somber mood of that day,
the rumors and the confusion, the frustration
of realizing that GQ's October issue had already
gone to press.
"We were so naïve," he said
referring to American society in general, "and
then our world became a more dangerous place,
a more anxious place." What we emerged
from, he added, "was not exactly the 'me'" decade,
but something pretty close to it." Now,
the era that spawned the movie Wall Street‹with
its glorification of greed, its junk bonds
and corporate takeovers‹ "seems
another age."
"We were so very insular," he said. "How
much did we know about Islam? I don't think
we were paying the right kind of attention." On
the other hand, Cooper does not see what is
happening now as a religious war or a "clash
of civilizations." Indeed, he sees it
as more than just a matter of fighting a war. "Where
is the humanitarian side of a US policy toward
the Muslim world?" he asked. And, he continued,
while we're focusing on Al Qaeda and the Taliban, "What
about the rest of the Muslim world? What have
we done to win their hearts and minds? Arab
attitudes toward the US are chilling."
Clearly,
he said, even though our most popular export
is movies, "we haven't done enough
to explain ourselves" to the rest of the
world. The image of the United States is not
what it should be. "There is a lot of
envy‹of our open society, the way we
treat women, the way we live." We have
become aware, he said, of our own need to better
understand other cultures and peoples.
Cooper
has sent reporters to Lebanon and Afghanistan,
started a column on the "shadow war" and
investigated the suicide bombers, all of it "trying
to make sense" of what is happening. "This
is not our main purpose," he said, "but
we are journalists after all."
Cooper's journalistic credentials date back
to 1964, when he went to work for the Harrisburg
(Pennsylvania) Patriot as a political reporter
after graduating from Penn State University.
At college, he had wanted to be a novelist
in the mold of Ernest Hemingway and John O'Hara.
He even fancied himself as a war correspondent.
But military service beckoned, and Cooper became
a communications intelligence officer in the
United States Navy. He went on to Time magazine
as a correspondent, and then to Newsweek as
an editor and cultural critic. Cooper later
spent a year as editor of Penthouse magazine
and five years as editor of Family Weekly,
where he had opportunities to interview US
presidents from Richard Nixon to Ronald Reagan.
Photographs showing him at the White House
grace his office, inviting impressed looks
from visitors.
He
took over the top job at GQ in 1983, just
a few years
after Condé Nast had purchased
the magazine (then devoted almost exclusively
to men's fashions) from the company that publishes
Esquire. Cooper‹whose wife, Amy, was
editor-in-chief of another Condé Nast
magazine, the now discontinued Mademoiselle‹gave
GQ a whole new look, taking the fashion models
off the cover and replacing them with celebrities
and athletes, and stressed not only the quality
of its visual elements but its writing as well. "We
started out with the radical notion," he
said a few years later, "that men of fashion
and style would be interested in stylish writing
too. I wanted a magazine that would be known
for its reporting and for the elegance of its
writing."
He
got the elegance and in-depth reporting from
well-known
Pulitzer-winning writers such
as David Halberstam and Ron Powers, and Wilfrid
Sheed, and the late Canadian novelist Mordecai
Richler. In fact, Cooper's very first issue
as editor-in-chief of GQ‹November 1983‹featured
Halberstam's memorable retrospective on the
20th anniversary of the assassination of President
John F. Kennedy.
"I still love to publish established
writers," Cooper said, alluding to his
constant pursuit of boldfaced bylines. He recently
got Michael Paterniti to come on board.
And are there any writers he'd love to snare?
"If there are two writers I really covet," Cooper
said, "they would be Anthony Lane and
Christopher Hitchens. They are both under contract
and very well paid."
Lane
writes on films for The New Yorker; Hitchens
writes
extensively for Vanity Fair and The
Nation. Cooper sees in such catches not simply
the delight of snatching writers away from
other magazines. GQ, he feels, offers a special
home for them; and writers with special sensibilities‹even
when their world view differs from Cooper's‹undeniably
enrich the magazine's editorial aggregate.
One of his journalistic mentors, the late Harold
Hayes‹who was editor of Esquire from
1962 to 1972‹taught him the value of
nourishing a magazine with fresh talent on
a continuous basis, what Cooper now calls "the
flowering of fresh voices."
"If this magazine connects with readers
the way Harold Hayes' Esquire did, nothing
would gratify me more," he said.
For
all of his journalistic concerns, however,
Cooper
is quick to point out that GQ's mission
is not at all the same as that of other magazines. "I
don't want the magazine to be overly serious," he
said, adding that its advertising tag line
is, "It's good to be a man," and
its focus is on living the good life. "We
want our readers to be surprised, but also
entertained and amused‹to have fun."
The
magazine still devotes many of its pages
to fashion
photos, news and advice, even though
Cooper insists that "what matters the
most to me is the quality of the writing we
publish."
"People want to have the best possible
life they can have," he said. "GQ
tries to show them that life, and to bond with
them by telling them stories." Cooper's
proud of GQ's track record in covering thorny
international issues such as human rights.
But he readily acknowledges that he's lagged
in tending to subjects such as the environment.
One difficulty in following current affairs,
of course, is the magazine's relatively long
lead time‹from receipt of an article
to publication‹of some two months. That's
why, Cooper says, GQ offers more by way of
perspective than coverage of breaking news.
What does he look for in a writer? "What
I look for most," he said, "is a
voice‹idiosyncratic voices, passion,
curiosity‹a writer with something to
say."
"It's really a distinctive style of writing
that I'm looking for," Cooper said. "What's
important for voice is a point of view. I'm
really not interested in objective journalism.
I'm not interested in publishing articles that
reflect the kind of institutional tone that,
say, the newsweeklies possess. I want writers
who have a point of view and who have the courage
to express that point of view."
And
so Cooper encourages the narrative technique
of the
novelist, wants his writers to come
up with telling detail, to really be stylists. "All
of our writers are very, very good reporters,
too," Cooper said. So what makes a good
editor? Or, to be specific, what's made Arthur
Cooper the editor that he is?
"I think it's partly the ability to spot
trends," he said. "You sense things.
It may even be luck. Luck, they say, is residue
of design. It's knowing how to ask the right
questions. I have a voracious appetite to know.
I'm sometimes called an educator‹but
I'm really a student. I always learn from everybody,
including the writers who work with me. I suppose
part of being a good editor is also having
the ability to pick the right people and then
giving them the resources and editorial support."
And
what's his own editorial voice like? Cooper's
physical
voice is one of his own most noticeable
assets. A deep, warm baritone growl, it is
at once authoritative and reassuring. One of
his stars, Allison Glock, has described it
as "thick with history and jazz‹a
voice that has been earned. A voice from another
time. A voice that will not be ignored."
"Which is why," she added, "it's
an immeasurable blessing that Art Cooper is
a man with so much to say."
He says it by not shouting. When he's angry,
his voice becomes even lower than usual. And
when he chats informally with his colleagues,
what does he dwell on?
"Sinatra, jazz, I talk about Watergate,
about my days at Time and Newsweek," Cooper
said. "I've also got to keep in mind that
for most of these young writers, 1985 is history.
My obsession with Watergate? That period is
not even in their consciousness."
But
never mind. Cooper knows he's from another
era. What's
on his mind, though, is enormous
satisfaction over what GQ has become under
his stewardship. He will readily say that GQ's
edge in the field of men's magazines comes
from the fact that it has a stable of hugely
talented writers and editors‹a staff
that Cooper's willing to match person for person
with any magazine in the world (including,
he adds, the 11 other international editions
of GQ, which are run independently of his US
edition). "I work for the best company
in the world," Cooper says, especially
citing Newhouse, James Truman (the editorial
director of Condé Nast), and Steven
Florio, the company president. Cooper notes
that in a year when many magazines have shuttered
because of declining ad revenues, Newhouse
has made huge investments in GQ by getting
on board Fred Woodward‹the distinguished
designer who was wooed away from Rolling Stone‹Mark
Seliger, the photographer, and Ron Galotti,
who's returned for his second stint at Condé Nast.
"This is a brutal business," Cooper
said. "But I've been lucky. I suppose
that I must have some talent and instinct that
works."
So then, does he think about his editorial
legacy?
"In this business, legacy is established
in two ways," Cooper said. "One is
in the kind of publication that you edit. You
hope that will achieve historical relevance‹a
great magazine that people will remember, such
as Harold Hayes' Esquire, or Harold Ross's
new Yorker, or Willie Morris's Harper's. Obviously,
your magazine will evolve and change after
you're gone. But you always hope that you will
have accomplished something that people will
remember and respect long after you're no longer
on the scene."
And
the second aspect of a legacy? "That
lies in the people who work with you, those
whom you bring along, those who will go on
to edit their own magazines," Cooper said. "Some
part of you will hopefully always be with them." It
seemed appropriate to ask him this question:
What was the single most powerful thing about
his job that he loved?
Arthur
Cooper said: "I once said to a
person I was trying to recruit, 'What do you
do when you wake up in the morning? Do you
roll over and try and grab a bit more sleep?
Or do you hop out of bed, raring to go to work?
I promise you that if you come to GQ, you will
not be able to wait to start work every morning."
He
continued: "And
you know what? That's exactly how I feel
every morning. I just cannot
wait to get to work. I don't want to miss a
single minute of work.
|