HONOLULU--One
of the world's leading telecommunications
gurus warned colleagues at the annual
meeting of the Pacific Telecommunications
Council Tuesday that unless they found
ways to adapt cutting-edge technology
so that it helped reduce the so-called
digital divide, democracy itself would
be under threat...
Pekka
Tarjanne, Secretary-General of the International Telecommunications
Union (ITU), told the Conference News Daily he had
come to the annual meeting of the PTC, which draws
its membership among government and industry leaders
from 55 nations, to deliver a "blunt" message
about the growing divide between the information "haves" and "have-nots".
The Orwellian factor, he said, was lurking for those
not careful enough.
"Mankind is not going to survive unless
the UN, the G-8, the Group of 77, the World Economic
Forum, the World Bank and the rest of the decision
makers are really concerned and concentrating
on the bridging of the digital divide," Tarjanne
said. "The problems are well known, the
solutions as well. There is enough capital available.
There is also a lot of political goodwill and
understanding – but, so far, no enough."
Tarjanne, a former member of parliament in his
native Finland who served as minister of transport
and communications for three years during the
1970s, has been has been secretary-general of
the ITU since 1989. His audience in Honolulu
this week included not only representatives of
governments in the Asia-Pacific region, but also
hundreds of directors of some of the world's
leading telephone, computer, satellite and related
communications companies.
Why, he asked, should it be more expensive to
call North Africa or a neighboring French village
from Geneva, than Hawaii? Why is the whole national
communications network in one of West Africa's
most successful economies, Cote d'Ivoire, capable
of carrying less, and therefore slower, computer
and telephone communications traffic than the
single line available to a teenager with a computer
in New York or London? Why should a local mobile
telephone call cost double in South Africa or
three times the price in Zambia of a similar
call placed in Helsinki? He said poorer people
are paying more for their communications and
their communications equipment than people in
the developed world.
"Information and communication technology
(ICT) has for years been looked upon as the gate
to paradise, in particular for the developing
countries. ICT is energy saving, non-polluting
and ecologically correct. ICT increases efficiency
and decreases costs. It is good for equality
and decentralization. It cuts across the board
as a tool for a better life – e-health,
e-education, e-commerce, e-governance," Tarjanne
said.
However, as the
ICT sector grows into the most significant
part of the global economy, the companies
and governments had to look at the risks threats
and dangers of the "fast-forward" movement.
They had to think of the implications for their
children and grandchildren.
"We all know that ICT accelerated the fall
of the Berlin Wall. We all know that ICT can
increase interactivity and pave the way to a
real global village. But, ITC can also be used
by dictators to control their citizens and make
their lives miserable," Tarjanne said.
"George Orwell's 1984 was a good book half
a century ago. Fortunately, its vision has not
been seen in real life except in some isolated
countries. The risks are, however, always there.
The Big Brother hides around the corner and will
attack if we are not alert enough," he said. "This
is true all over the world, even among the champions
of democracy."
He publicly cited China for the ruling Communist
Party's attempts to police perceived electronic
dissidence. The high cost of telephone calls
in many developing nations, he added, are attributable
to combination of government corruption and poor
governance. The industry had to do more to fight
cyber crime; it had to do more research to ensure
that mobile telephones do not fry our brains;
and above all it had to ensure fair access of
ITC education across the world, and make sure
at the same time that children grow up with a
sense of what is right and what is wrong.
According to recent ITU statistics, 72 countries
have now made commitments under the basic telecommunications
agreement to progressively liberalize their telecommunication
markets.
In 1996, the value of revenue from public international
telecommunications traffic was just over 10 per
cent of a total global market of $ 670 billion.
As a result of the basic telecommunications agreement,
together with other trends towards globalization,
technological change, market liberalization and
foreign ownership, Tarzana said that percentage
was expected to increase considerably, perhaps
reaching 15-20 per cent by the early years of
the next century.
As a result of the changes that took place at
the start of this year, notably within the 15
Member States of the European Union, some three-quarters
of all international telephone traffic is now
provided under competitive market conditions
compared with just 35 per cent in 1990. As a
result of commitments already made, that percentage
will increase to a minimum of 85 per cent by
the year 2005.
Since the start of 1996, more than 35 independent
telecommunications regulatory agencies have been
established around the world. Under their commitments
to the basic international telecommunications
agreement, countries have indicated the level
of foreign ownership they are willing to permit.
PTC officials in Honolulu said this was already
bearing fruit as investors around the world have
identified the telecommunications sector as a
sound investment. Private capital being invested
in privatization opportunities and in infrastructure
development now far outweighs public money.
In 1997 alone, according to the ITU statistics,
more than US$ 45 billion was invested in 16 separate
privatizations of public telecommunication operators,
all of which involved a significant component
of foreign capital.
|