MELBOURNE, Australia--Werasit
Sittitrai is the Associate Director for
UNAIDS in Asia, Pacific and the Middle
East. UNAIDS is the joint AIDS program
of eight United Nations organizations.
A dedicate advocate for HIV/AIDS prevention
and treatment, Sittitrai has been fully
involved in ICAAP. He rushed from meeting
to meeting everyday, but managed to find
time and a smile for those who wanted to
talk to him. The following are excerpts
from an interview:
What
role has UNAIDS played in the running and organizing
of ICAAP?
UNAIDS is one of two major co-sponsors of ICAAP
along with the AIDS Society for Asia and the
Pacific. We have been involved in the organization
of the last three ICAAPs and will be involved
in Kobe, Japan in 2003.
Our contribution has been in all aspects. We
took part in the discussions on the scientific
program, community program and positive forum
program as well as the composition of the plenary
session. We also contributed to the theme of
the conference and how to translate the theme
into different messages. In addition UNAIDS also
sponsors a number of sessions which address critical
issues and key areas. An example is a session
on the success story of Cambodia. We organized
that and brought in different ministers, NGOs
and other partners. We sponsored the session
of First Ladies--who made a strong commitment
to a response, especially in relation to the
vulnerability of rural women. We also sponsored
a session with parliamentarians who pledged to
mobilize their peers and constituents as well
as to look into the changing of domestic laws
and policies.
What is the significance of addressing issues
such as Gender and Sexuality which are generally
considered taboo and not talked about in the
region?
I believe that it is critical
to address these so called "sensitive issues" in
the region. For UNAIDS these are not sensitive
issues,
they are important and critical issues that we
need to address in order to advance a response
to the epidemic. We always encourage and promote
organizations which address these issues in their
countries. We also encourage politicians and
national leaders to make tough political decisions
in admitting that those issues exist in their
country. These need to be brought into the discussion
even if they have to confront traditional views.
These include sexuality, gender inequality, condom
promotion, harm reduction among injecting drug
users, indigenous and minority issues, mobile
populations and prices of drugs.
What is UNAIDS' position on access to drug therapy
and the cost of these drugs?
UNAIDS negotiates with pharmaceutical companies
to get the drugs as cheaply as possible for developing
countries. We strengthen the role of the community
and people living with HIV/AIDS with the government
to be able to put their needs and demands in
negotiation in terms of getting a good price.
We also help to build capacity in terms of implementing
the treatment.
Does the Ministerial Meeting really show political
commitment? Is there going to be a change on
the ground?
This meeting organized by the Australian government
is by itself evidence of very high level and
strong commitment from the countries. Over 30
ministers, not just health ministers, set aside
the work in their own countries and came here.
They have discussed openly how to advance the
response, not only in their own country but also
in the region. I attended the meetings and I
heard every single minister pledge their commitment
in a very strong way which I never heard before
at this level. Quite a number also put a target
for those commitments publicly in front of their
peers. They said they would go back and address
sensitive issues. They all agree on the declaration
of commitment and the discussion on the statement
didn't take very long. Of course when a commitment
comes one wonders if resources to support it
will follow. But, for instance, the Vice-Minister
for Health in China said that China will increase
the national budget on HIV/AIDS. Donor governments
there also pledged their support. Looking at
the success stories of Thailand and Cambodia
they felt much more confident that whatever the
situation is in their country they can really
make a difference.
How much progress has been made since the 5th
ICAAP in Kuala Lumpur?
I can cite a few achievements since the 5th
ICAAP. Of course one of them is the success story
of Cambodia as a country. We are very proud that
this region has two success stories--Thailand
and Cambodia. And I truly believe that at Kobe
we'll be able to announce another success story
and that's a goal we have to work toward.
There is consensus that the epidemic is spreading
in this region even though it is at a lower level
in some countries. There is definitely a sense
of urgency. We see more recognition of vulnerable
populations like indigenous people, minorities,
sex workers, injecting drug users and men having
sex with men.
And what are the goals for the next two years
till Kobe?
There are still a few barriers that we need
to address. That includes access to prevention
for many people in many countries, access to
treatment and care and support. We have to strengthen
health care, but also community and home care
support. Because in this region family and community
care is the really important thing. So I think
it's good that in December there will be the
International Home and Community Care conference
in Chaing Mai Thailand. It's the first time it
is organized in a developing country. That will
also help linking this ICAAP and the next in
terms of home and community care which is the
basic structure of care in this region. In western
countries you go to hospitals, in this region
it's the community and home.
We still have a lot of work to do in terms of
access to treatment and care, however we felt
that in this conference the recognition of the
role of people in the community as well as people
living with HIV/AIDS was very strong. It's the
first time that we have a forum specifically
for people living with the virus. There was also
greater collaboration such as the attendance
of ministers from different ministries. The organization
of the coalition of regional NGO networks, called
the 7 sisters was also an achievement.
I think another achievement is in getting resources.
The Australian government has pledged commitment
and support, as well as other donors. I believe
that with the Global Health and AIDS fund more
resources will be available.
In terms of political commitment--at the UN
special session in June there was some commitment.
At this conference you hear that people saying
that no Asia-Pacific head of government went
to the UN GA and that message will be brought
home. With the ministerial meeting I think in
the near future we will see more awareness, attendance
and commitment from the heads of government.
We're looking forward to the ASEAN head of government
summit in November in Brunei at which they have
a special session in AIDS for the first time
in history.
I hope that in Kobe there will be a high level
of participation possibly from First Ladies again,
heads of government and definitely from ministries.
I think it's good news that Australia is planning
to host the next ministerial meeting in two years.
What countries in the region are most at risk
of a large scale epidemic? Potentially if they
don't do any expanded response in an intensive
way--we talk about Vietnam, Indonesia, India
and of course we talk about Myanmar as well.
These are the countries we are concerned about.
China as well, even though prevalence is in pockets
around urban areas, because of the size of the
population the numbers are high.
Minister Downer pledged money to harm reduction
for injecting drug users and there have been
many sessions on this topic. How will this increase
support for prevention and treatment for injecting
drug users?
I think in the past the issue of injecting drug
use and HIV/AIDS was not well addressed in this
region. It is very important in terms of the
spread of HIV through sharing needles. The vulnerability
and stigmatization around drug use is high and
they could not come out to receive services or
express their needs and demands. I think in this
ICAAP we have achieved a major step in awareness
and recognizing that HIV spread among injecting
drug users is a priority to push forward.
Unless we address this issue from both the prevention
of HIV side and also the stigma and discrimination
side we cannot make a difference in terms of
controlling the epidemic in this region. So again,
congratulations for the success that came out
of both the Ministerial Meeting and the ICAAP.
Pushing awareness and commitment to this issue
has to continue. There's still a lot of work
to be done to push harm reductions policy to
many governments who don't have favorable positions
and also implementing programs that involves
planning, decision making and participation of
drug users.
What are the key factors in advancing HIV/AIDS
prevention and treatment in the region?
First is to get political commitment
at the highest level. At the next ICAAP it
would be
wonderful to announce that so-and-so country
now has the Prime Minister or President chairing
the National AIDS Committee. Secondly, for many
countries to announce that their national AIDS
program involves many ministries other than health.
Of course health plays a key role, but ministries
of labor, education, interior and agriculture
have to be involved. They have to come up with
a major role, have their AIDS plan and budget
to reach the population. The aim is to implement
intensive prevention programs within a short
period of time to cover all the population. Another
key to success is large scale implementation
of programs. You can have a thousand success
stories, but not much change in the course of
the epidemic unless you cover at least half the
country or the whole country. Reducing stigma
and discrimination is a major obstacle. Even
if you have care and support facilities no one
will come out if there is stigma. That is why
some of the community groups say our motto should
be "My son with AIDS is still my son." Cooperation
between countries in terms of exchange of experience
is important as well as peer support among politicians
and leaders and an increase in government budgets.
These are some of the things that everyone knows
about and are common sense, but we have to get
out and do them.
|