Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are cornerstones of the republic since its inception over two centuries ago. Like all freedoms,they can be abused, and the United States has laws against slander and libel to deal with such cases. Banning the distribution of newspapers at selected hotels is something else altogether. Seizing press releases and threatening to bar reporters from the premises are acts fundamentally at odds with the concept of a free press and an informed public.

It is fair to say that the WEF has never bridged the cultural gap that exists between the exclusivity of a private club and the requirements of a free press. Conflicts have arisen in the past at Davos, and tempers flared as a result. In most cases, an uneasy truce was reached, and the show went on. In New York, however, no such resolution has been forthcoming.

The anger of journalists over being barred from attending the WEF sessions was palpable to anyone who spent any time in the Intercontinental's media center. Many of the reporters had come to New York from overseas and were not pleased with the treatment given them at this year's meeting. In reporting on their anger, the Earth Times was not only exercising its First Amendment rights, it was also publicizing a legitimate news story, complete with quotes from people willing to go on the record. The leaders of the WEF may not have liked the message, but attacking the messenger in the manner they chose is contrary to the whole idea of an open society.

The WEF is a private club operating in the public arena. It has enjoyed the security provided by New York City's police force, many of whose officers have stood in the rain and cold to ensure the safety of those attending this year's meeting. To maintain its own credibility as a forum for a free exchange of ideas, the WEF must observe the rules of the game - and that includes giving more than lip service to the First Amendment.