BONN--In
the Koolau Mountains behind Waikiki on the Hawaiian
Island of Oahu, trees grow like Manhattan buildings
lining 50th street. Their branches quarrel high
overhead, and in the rain Honolulu is diminished
to a white puddle of light glimpsed below between
giant ferns. This sporadic rain on the leeward
side of the island belies the lush flora.
On the
Pacific Islands, the local Hawaiians grow fat-leaved
plants called Taro. Once the staple food for the indigenous
population, the forgotten agriculture has been revived
in recent years in a flurry of nationalism. On Oahu
it is with the Taro, partly, that the fight for the
freshwater began.
"The issue on
Oahu for the past 10
years has been the
closing of the large
sugar plantations that
have occupied the central
plainsfor over 100
years," said Denise
C. De Costa, Information
Officer for theHawaiian
Board of Water Supply. "But
now that they finally
went out ofbusiness
the question has been
how the water should
be reapplied."
More then a century
ago a system of dikes
and ditches were dug
into the Koolau Mountains
that separate the leeward
and windward sides
ofthe island. Much
of the water from the
wet windward side was
diverted to feed the
leeward plantations.
"In the past
50 years alone we have
lost some 24 streams
on this side," said
George Hudes, a Taro
farmer and Hawaiian
cultural teacher in
Waiahole Valley on
the windward side. "From
the turn of the century
we have lost almost
96 percent of our water
flows."
A legal case was brought
to the Water Commission,
demanding that with
the sugar plantations
gone, the water should
be returned to the
windward side. The
commission decided
to return 50 percent
of it, but the case
is under a second appeal
by both sides and has
been postponed to allow
time for more studies.
"If we said that
development occurs
where the resources
are then Waiahole would
be full of resorts
and golf course," said
Alan M.Oshima, a lawyer
and partner of Oshima,
Chun, Fong, and Chung
Limited Liability Law
Partnership in Honolulu
who argued the leeward
case to the Board of
Water. "So if
you have development
on the dry side then
the water has to come
from some where. What
is needed is a sharing
of resources, which
is also, by the way,
a very Hawaiian concept."
Much of the legal
argument to win the
freshwater back to
the windward side was
based on the heavy
need of water for Taro
plants. Waiahole, like
many parts of the windward
side, remains mostly
underdeveloped at the
request of the native
Hawaiians who want
to preserve these lands.
It has become a cultural
center for many Hawaiians
on Oahu.
"Taro is our
older brother," said
Calvin Hoe,another
Taro grower and teacher
at the Indigenous school
in Waiahole. "It
is made into our staple
food, Poi, which we
hope to begin substituting
for rice which has
slowly taken its place
over the last century."
The native Hawaiians
believe that Wakea,
the sky father, and
his daughter Hoohokulani's
first son was stillborn.
They planted the body
in the Eastern corner
of the house, and from
that sight grew Taro.
Their second son was
Haloa, the first man,
so Taro, his older
brother, fed him with
Poi(made from crushing
Taro roots).
"I don't disagree
with the feeling of
having your own land," said
Oshima. "But there
hasn't been any more
Taro produced than
there was in 1997 when
the decision was handed
down. Charter schools
(the Hawaiian environmental
school founded by Hoe)
are great, but Taro
is not an economic
engine. People will
not go back to raking
in the mud. I don't
think that it is any
secret objective in
their use of water
to stop growth."
Hoe
was quite vocal on
the subject. "There
are too many people
here, every one should
just have their own
space and not crowd
others" he said
hiking down the muddy
trail that crosses
three swollen streams
from his Taro patch
to the road.
"It is a classic
story of the small
farmer being neglected
in favor of the big
corporations," said
De Costa. "But
I can see both sides
of it. In Calvin's
case, he is the only
native Hawaiian of
about 15 farmers that
actually farm on the
windward side. So there
not such a demand for
it."
For
Hoe and other Hawaiians,
having won
back half the water
is not enough. They
would like to see what
they consider originally
theirs returned, although
today it is hard to
determine what the
original natural flow
was in the 19th century
before the diversion. "No
reliable data exists," said
DeCosta, who also asserted
that too much freshwater
has been proven to
hurt the coral reefs
in the surrounding
bays.
"It is not so
much the water," said
Oshima."It's the
mud and soot, and everything
that humans put into
the earth that comes
down with the water."
Hoe asserted that
any amount of freshwater
is invariably good
for the marine ecosystems.
He also said that more
Taro plants are on
their way. Standing
in a Taro field surrounded
by some of his students,
he talkedabout the
proud Hawaii tradition
of making Poi.
"This is a battle
for the future," he
said."If you control
the water you control
the island, you control
the future.I don't
care about money or
profits. I care about
being able to live
in our traditional
way in peace, and stopping
more development on
the other side ofthe
island."
|