UNITED
NATIONS - Unless something goes horribly wrong
in the final hours, it seems that here in the
US the multimillionaire Boys of Summer may not
strike
after all this weekend but conclude a deal with
the billionaire owners. Earlier visions of empty
stadiums and enraged fans deprived of their baseball
fix have faded some. Hard-fought pennant races
probably will go down to the wire in the usual
way and the subsequent World Series between the
respective leaders of the American and National
Leagues may not have to be canceled. Oh, what
a relief.
In
any event, the Men of Fall soon will be seizing
the sports spotlight. Football once again will
claim preeminence over sprightlier baseball. We
are talking here not of European-style football
(a/k/a "Soccer" in the US), a, fast-paced
yet graceful game with hints of ballet, but of
the peculiarly American variety of the sport, where
participants routinely weigh in at 250 lbs or more
avoirdupois and must wear elaborate protective
gear complete with helmets and face guards or risk
serious injury in the struggle for touchdowns and
field goals.
To call their movements
lumbering, despite
all that weight to
carry, would be pejorative
and misplaced. Ample
waistlines and the
restrictions imposed
by a standard football
uniform still leave
a surprising number
of players quite fleet
of foot. A sumo wrestler
should be half so agile.
Impressed by the size
of these ball players,
The New York Times
sports writer Selena
Roberts reported the
other day that some
American football pros
subsist on a daily
diet of 12,000 calories.
One massive performer
is not nicknamed The
Refrigerator for nothing.
The sturdiest professional
footballer recently
checked in at 400lbs
and others are proud
to be in the 300lb
range. Of course, these
guys do tend also to
be lofty, so all that
fat and muscle is at
least distributed throughout
a large frame and powerful
limbs. A mere six-footer
would be considered
almost a runt by comparison.
Roberts was concerned
in her article for
the potential health
consequences of so
much weight. In fact,
more than one young,
apparently healthy
but still overweight
and probably artery-clogged
professional footballer
has keeled over and
died unexpectedly.
Roberts faulted some
team coaches for encouraging
their players to bulk
up, believing this
to be an advantage.
One hefty quarterback
is reported to eat
his breakfast corn
flakes from a kitchen
mixing bowl, the kind
that chefs use to prepare
food for a dozen or
more people.
The above notes are
of more than marginal
interest in a UN context
because they illustrate
yet another example
of the huge differences
that exist between
affluent America and
much of the rest of
the world whose problems
now are being addressed
at the Johannesburg
summit. While many
Americans and Canadians
are gluttons without
ever realizing it --
and are encouraged
in gluttony by fast-food
merchants who push
sales of bulging cheeseburgers
and overstuffed sandwiches
-- hundreds of millions
of Africans, Asians
and Latin Americans
never quite know where
their next meal may
come from. Or if there
will even be one. Factoids:
Canadians love to snack
between regular meals
and are reported to
consume seven times
as many doughnuts per
head as their US neighbors;
26 percent of Americans
are obese and 35 percent
are overweight.
In the runup to the
national and international
commemoration of the
tragedy of Sept. 11
-- for which President
Bush will be in New
York and the UN will
hold a parallel event
in its General Assembly
hall -- it's not easy
to find a popular subject
that is not somehow
related to the war
on terrorism. Currently,
at least one popular
US alternate is the
battle of the bulge
and how best to fight
it.
For years, the pendulum
for portly Americans
eager to slim down
has swung from one
fad diet to its successor,
and on and on. An especially
bizarre example was
the Drinking Man's
Diet popular a few
decades ago. This program
sanctioned the famous
three-Martini lunch,
so long as the main
part of the meal was
lettuce unadorned and
cardboard-tasting fat-free
cheese. What this may
have done to the dieter's
liver was left unmentioned.
The
latest contest --
actually, it has
been going on a long
time but has become
sharper recently thanks
to the entry of federal
agencies into the debate
-- is between dietary
fats on the one hand
and carbohydrates like
bread ("the staff
of life" no more?)
and cereals on the
other.
A
regimen developed
30 years ago by the
Manhattan physician
Robert Atkins and widely
ridiculed by other "experts" ever
since -- mainly for
his advice on the judicious
consumption of tasteful
fat meat, other proteins
and butter, but few
carbohydrates, as a
means to lose weight
and lower cholesterol
levels -- now is gaining
acceptance amid signs
that the National Institutes
of Health may be willing
to modify its earlier
cautions. For persons
interested there is
a Web site: www.atkinscenter.com).
Squaring
off against Atkins
is the leader
of the anti-fat brigade
Dean Ornish, author
of "Eat More,
Weigh Less." He
also is a physician.
Ornish claims that
a diet heavy on complex
carbohydrates but very,
very light on fats
will shed weight and
keep it off, help reverse
heart disease and has
even obviated in many
of his patients their
previous need for bypass
surgery. Also, cholesterol
dramatically decreased.
Here the problem is
all about how not to
eat too much, and too
much of the wrong food.
But in many developing
countries a steady
daily diet of 2,000
calories is unattainable
nirvana. The UN Millennium
Summit set nutrition
goals which are very
far from being met
and the current conference
may have results no
better, without big
changes in priorities
and in political will.
It goes without saying
that in Africa and
parts of Asia, the
vagaries of climate
have been largely responsible
for poor harvests and
consequent millions
of empty bellies. But
misguided government
policies and out and
out corruption also
are to blame, the evidence
suggests.
The International
Crisis Group headed
by former President
Martti Ahtisaari of
Finland just issued
a new report on Zimbabwe,
where it says the ruling
party headed by President
Robert Mugabe has not
been averse to the
use of food supplies
(or the lack thereof)
as a weapon against
its political opposition.
The situation has worsened
as the country heads
into local elections
scheduled for Sept.
28-29, which Mugabe's
ZANU-PF party aims
to win by fair means
or foul.
Mugabe is down to
address the Johannesburg
summit on Tuesday.
No doubt, he will be
accorded the customary
honors just as if he
were a democratically-elected
leader, which many
believe he is not.
The ICG report mentions
that while the recent
focus of news dispatches
from Harare has been
on the forcible seizure
of farms that had been
owned by white Zimbabwean
families for generations,
an estimated 1.5 black
farm workers are suffering
even more from this
land grab policy, with
many of them facing
acute hunger. Meanwhile,
says John Prendergast,
an ICG official recently
in Zimbabwe, deaths
from AIDS in the country
are accelerating because
of poor nutrition due
to the denial of food.
"The distribution
of food aid has been
politicized, but the
commercial food sector
is also increasingly
monopolized and corrupted
by ZANU-PF," says
Prendergast. "The
Zimbabwe govenment's
strategy of using food
as a political weapon
is working. People
are beginning to die
because of their perceived
support of the opposition
party Movement for
Demoocratic Change."
Ahtisaari's
group, of which former
Australian
foreign minister Gareth
Evans is president,
mentioned in its report
US "rhetoric" that
greeted Mugabe's latest
return to power in
elections widely considered
fraudulent. Rhetoric
is not enough; ICG
wants more "assertive" diplomacy
and "real international
cooperation" to
promote democratic
change in tortured
Zimbabwe.
|