| WASHINGTON--A
top U.S. State Department official has all but
rejected a proposal to establish a World Environmental
Organization,
similar to the World Trade Organization. The official
went further, stating, "Since the 1992 Rio
Summit, experience shows that the international
community
does not need new treaties, new bureaucracies,
or new government-to-government aid commitments."
The
comments--which are certain to provoke controversy
as the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD)
gets underway this week in Johannesburg -- were made
by Paula Dobriansky, Under Secretary of State for
Global Affairs, in an interview Aug. 22 with TechCentralStation.com.
Many
of the delegates at the summit favor establishing
a WEO to set global rules for
environmental protection and to balance the
powerful World Trade Organization, and, according
to an earlier report in Earth Times, "the
European Union is vigorously pushing for such
an organization."
A
study released earlier this year by a United
Nations think
tank, the UN University Institute
for Advanced Studies in Tokyo, concluded, "A
well constituted WEO could act as a check or
counterweight to overreaching by the WTO." And
Earth Times reported earlier that Klaus Toepfer
of Germany, who heads the UN Environment Programme,
and Nitin Desai of India, Secretary General
of the WSSD, are the leading candidates to
head a WEO "if such an agency is created."
But,
asked about a prospective WEO in her interview,
Dobriansky said: "Our view
is that sustainable development begins and
ends at home--hence, our emphasis on domestic
good governance, on economic reforms and investment
in people. In Johannesburg, we are not looking
at the creation of new bureaucracies. There
are existing institutions, like the Commission
on Sustainable Development, which can be well
used."
Dobriansky will be the highest-ranking U.S.
State Department official at the WSSD until
the arrival of Secretary Colin Powell later
in the conference.
In
the interview, conducted in Washington before
her departure
for the Johannesburg summit,
Dobriansky elaborated, "What is needed
are concrete initiatives, concrete actions
that take place on the ground -- when you have
a commitment to good governance, when you have
investments in health and education, and you
have economic policies that encourage private-enterprise
development.
"That
is what is going to facilitate sustained
development, not the creation of
new bureaucracies."
Also
in an interview with TechCentralStation.com
last
week, a U.S. government official who requested
anonymity defended President Bush's decision
not to attend the Johannesburg summit. The
president, said the official, "will be
visiting Africa in 2003" and has already
attended "two summits this year with a
very significant focus on development: the
UN-sponsored conference on financing for development,
which was held at Monterey, Mexico, and then
the G-8 meeting." The official also pointed
to other recent meetings on sustainable development
in which the U.S. has played a key role, including
the Doha Summit, with its focus on liberalizing
agricultural trade, and the Food Summit in
Rome.
Moreover,
said the official, the U.S. is sending a "high-level, multi-agency delegation." In
addition to Powell and Dobriansky, it includes
Christine Todd Whitman, who heads the Environmental
Protection Administration; James L. Connaughton,
chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality;
and Andrew S. Natsios, head of the U.S. Agency
for International Development.
The
official also pointed to a U.S. decision
to boost
development assistance by $5 billion,
or 50 percent, by 2006; to a "new international
mother-and-child prevention initiative for
Africa and the Caribbean, a $200 million five-year
education initiative in Africa that basically
supplies some 4.5 million textbooks--and the
25 percent increase in US AID funding for agricultural
development assistance," announced in
Rome in June.
In
addition, the official stressed the importance
of trade,
noting that the U.S. "brings
in some $450 billion worth of purchases from
developing countries--every year. This amount
is more than eight times the amount developing
countries receive in aid from all sources."
The
official also clarified the general U.S.
posture for
Johannesburg--an emphasis on "co-accountability,
co-responsibility in development"; on
public-private partnerships, such as a recently
announced $40 million initiative, backed by
US AID and the Conrad Hilton Foundation "to
provide potable water and sanitation to rural
villages in Ghana, Mali and Niger; and on the
principle that "there is a direct correlation
between economic growth and environmental stewardship."
The
official said that the U.S. wants to help
developing
nations improve their economies,
but added, "What is crucial here is that
you have to have development in countries that
are willing to make a commitment--to ensure
they are committed to good domestic governance,
to economic freedom and to an investment in
their people. You have to have that kind of
foundation."
Asked
about the issue of climate change, which
dominated
UN meetings over the past two years
in The Hague, Bonn and Marrakech, Morocco,
the official said, "Our view is that the
summit in Johannesburg is broadly about sustainable
development. Climate change is one component
of that in a broader whole.
There
is a separate forum which we remain committed
to. We're part of the framework convention.
We remain committed to the framework convention.
That is the appropriate forum to discuss at
great length and extensively the issue of climate
change."
Finally,
the official stressed that the U.S. goes
into
Johannesburg "with the intent
of seeking and wanting a constructive and successful
summit."
|