Corporate Social Responsibility | Business Wire | PR NewsWire | Marketwire | Realwire | ACN/JCN newswire | 247pressrelease | PRWeb

Should Distracted Driving Laws Apply to All Texas Drivers?

Posted : Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:14:08 GMT
Author : 247pressrelease
Category : Press Release
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
News | Home
Texas recently joined the growing number of states that are putting limits on driver cell phone use and texting.

October 31, 2009 /24-7PressRelease/ -- Should Distracted Driving Laws Apply to All Texas Drivers?

Article provided by Law Office of Julie Johnson, PLLC
Visit us at www.JulieJohnsonLaw.com

Within the last few years, there has been a growing national focus on how dangerous it is for drivers to talk on cell phones and send and receive text messages while driving. Across the country, there has been a push in state legislatures to pass laws that either outright ban both activities by drivers or limit cell phone use to more experienced, adult drivers using hands-free devices.

Texas has become one of the most recent states to join those that have put limits on driver cell phone use and texting. However, the narrow reach of the legislation has left some asking if the law should do more to protect the public from these dangerous activities.

Limits on Teen and Bus Driver Use, School Zones

On September 1, two new cell phone laws went into effect for Texans:
-HB 339: prohibits drivers under 18 years old from using any wireless communication devices while driving, including hands-free cell phone devices, except in cases of an emergency
-HB 55: prohibits drivers from using hands-held devices in school crossing zones (but drivers still may use hands-free devices) and prohibits bus drivers transporting minors from using cell phones at any time while operating the vehicle, except when the vehicle is stopped

HB 339 was passed in response to the growing number of teen drivers in Texas involved in car accidents. Currently, the state has one of the highest teen accident rates in the country. Several national studies have shown that younger, less experienced drivers are more likely to engage in dangerous activities while driving, like talking on cell phones and/or texting. A study conducted by the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) found that drivers in the under 20 age group have the greatest proportion of accidents caused by distracted drivers.

Finding a Balance between Public Safety and Civil Liberties

In the past, members of the state legislature have tried to pass more far-reaching legislation that would prohibit broader uses of cell phones and texting by more drivers. However, those opposed to the legislation have been able to prevent more restrictive laws from passing by arguing that they impose unfair limits on civil liberties and that the state can achieve the same goal by educating drivers about the dangers of phone use and texting. House Bills 339 and 55 seem to represent a compromise between these two groups.

Some, however, question whether this compromise is a sound one and whether the state should have passed a broader ban. After all, teen drivers are not the only ones who are responsible for causing accidents. Other drivers are just as susceptible to being distracted by a phone conversation or text message.

While those opposed to passing broader bans in Texas point out that there will always be something that can distract a driver, study after study has proven that cell phone use and texting remain the most dangerous distraction available to drivers. Consider the following statistics:
-Nationally, it is estimated that 80% of all accidents are caused by distracted drivers
-In 2008, 2.35 million people were injured in car accidents. 515,000 of those injured were involved in an accident with a distracted driver
-In the same year, more than 100,000 Texans were injured in crashes caused by driver inattention or distraction
-A study conducted by the Virginia Technology Transportation Institute (VTTI) found that texting while driving is more dangerous than drinking and driving
-The VTTI study also found that drivers who text while behind the wheel have a 23 times greater risk of being in an accident, as compared with a 4 times greater risk by drivers who are talking on a cell phone or who have consumed alcoholic beverages

Experts, like those at the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, believe that these numbers are conservative at best. The national statistics are based only on reported accidents in which the police indicated driver distraction as the cause of the accident. But not all states list driver distraction as a cause of an accident. Further, the statistics leave out all of the minor fender-benders and other accidents that went unreported to the police as well as those close-calls that could have resulted in a catastrophic collision. Thus, the actual number of crashes and fatalities caused by driver distraction may be much higher than reflected in the numbers.

Conclusion

Driver distraction is a serious problem, regardless of the age or experience of the driver. If you or a loved one has been involved in an accident caused by a distracted driver, contact an experienced attorney today. You should not have to suffer because another driver thought making a phone call or reading a text message was more important than paying attention to the road.

Article provided by Law Office of Julie Johnson, PLLC
Visit us at www.JulieJohnsonLaw.com

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Should Distracted Driving Laws Apply to All Texas Drivers?
Print this article
Share this article

Stay Updated

News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Related News

Uzbekistan 2020 Celebrated in Paris the Astronomer Mirzo Ulughbeg in presence of Buzz Aldrin
PARIS, November 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Lola Karimova-Tillyaeva, permanent representative of the Republic of Uzbekistan to UNESCO and founder of Fund Uzbekistan 2020, opened today, the International Astronomy Conference held in Institut d'...

TASE- The Week in Review: November 22nd - November 26th
TEL AVIV, Israel - During the fourth week of November, trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) was marked by a mixed trend, same as last week. The TA-25 index, which rose 1% during the week, completed a cumulative year-to-date increase of 65%. The TA-75 index decreases

Research and Markets: Global Wind Turbine Components Market: Provides an in-Depth Analysis of Market Drivers and Restraints, Industry Structure, and Competitive Environment
DUBLIN - Research and Markets (

Newstrike and Queenston JV Report First Phase Drill Results From Kirkland Lake, Ontario
TORONTO, ONTARIO -- 11/26/09 -- Newstrike Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE: NR) ("Newstrike") and Queenston Mining Inc. (TSX: QMI)(FRANKFURT: QMI)(STUTTGART: QMI) ("Queenston") are pleased to announce results from the first phase drilling program on the..

Research and Markets: Travel Law and Litigation: This Book Sets out the Substantive Law and Procedure, in Its UK and International Context, with Admirable Clarity
DUBLIN - Research and Markets (

Research and Markets: Alzheimer Disease Therapy Area Pipeline Report Provides Insight into the Pipeline Status of Alzheimer Disease Drugs and Summarizes the Latest News and Developments
DUBLIN - Research and Markets (

Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG Decides on New Corporate Structure
HEIDELBERG, Germany - The Management Board and Supervisory Board of Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG (Heidelberg) (FWB:HDD) has today reached a decision to restructure the company. In order to make implementation of the Heidelberg strategy even more efficient, the company will be split in

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark
 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.