Tobacco Industry Puts Profits Before Kids in Defeating Oregon Ballot Initiative
|
| Posted
:
Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:29:45 GMT |
| Author
:
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids |
| Category
:
Press Release |
| News
Alerts by Email click
here ) |
|
|
|
News |
Home
|
|
|
WASHINGTON, Nov. 7 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- By telling $12 million worth of lies, the Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds tobacco companies have again protected their profits at the expense of children by defeating a ballot initiative to increase Oregon's cigarette tax and fund health care for children. The tobacco companies will profit by selling more cigarettes, while Oregonians will pay a terrible price with more kids addicted to tobacco, more lives lost and more kids without health care.
Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds opposed this initiative because they know that increasing the cigarette tax is one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking, especially among children, and they also know that the public strongly supports increasing the cigarette tax. These tobacco companies knew they couldn't win by arguing against the cigarette tax increase, so they spent a record $12 million to change the subject and deceive the voters of Oregon. In fact, the tobacco companies made this election about anything but the cigarette tax increase, which is the one issue they truly cared about.
Throughout the campaign, media reports regularly exposed the industry's deceptive tactics, including the creation of an industry-funded front group -- Oregonians Against the Blank Check; RJR's distribution of a mass-mailed letter that appeared to come from a first-grade teacher but was mailed from the office of the company's lobbyist; and false claims in TV ads. The tobacco companies' ads falsely claimed that the money raised would not be spent on children's health care and manufactured controversy about amending the Oregon Constitution despite the fact it has similarly been amended many times (and the tobacco companies themselves have proposed constitutional amendments in other states). The $12 million spent by Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds more than doubled the previous record for an Oregon ballot initiative and was nearly four times what proponents of the initiative spent.
Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds should be held accountable for the high cost in health, lives and money that the people of Oregon will pay. Because this measure was defeated, 29,000 more kids will become smokers, 13,000 lives will be lost to tobacco-caused disease, and Oregon will pay $662 million more in long-term health care costs. In addition, more than 100,000 deserving Oregon children will go without the health coverage Measure 50 would have provided.
The Oregon outcome does not change the fact that the public strongly supports increasing tobacco taxes. National and state polls across the country show overwhelming support for tobacco tax increases -- support that extends across party lines, from smokers and non-smokers alike, throughout all regions. Since Jan. 1, 2002, 44 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia have increased their cigarette tax rates more than 75 times -- more than doubling the national average cigarette tax from 43.4 cents to $1.09 a pack. Increasing federal and cigarette taxes remains one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking, especially among kids, and the public will continue to support it.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
|
Copyright © 2008
PR Newswire. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
oregon tobacco
By:
Curt ,
Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:56:03 GMT |
|
Bull shit. Big T had little do do with the measures defeat. The measure was poorly written and the authors failed to identify their audience. If you want a sin tax, then all sins must pay. Wine, beer, liquor, chewing tobacco, cigars. If they would have been included then I would have voted for it. But I have never liked bullies. And this measure was a big one. However, the authors were smug, self centerd, and they payed dearly for it.
|
|
Tobacco, Health Care and Government
By:
Ron ,
Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:58:23 GMT |
|
If all you say in the article is true about the tobacco companies then their motives were self-serving and their tactics dishonest, but for once they helped do something good for us by helping to defeat this terrible measure.
I would vote for an increase in cigarette taxes because I want to discourage the use of tobacco products. But this measure is embraced for discouraging the use of tobacco products and raising revenue from tobacco products. If it discourages the use of cigarettes then it will not raise enough revenue. We can’t have it both ways.
We all know that the cigarette tax wouldn’t have paid for all the people who would have received health care coverage. Even if we accept (which I don’t) the numbers (what it would cost and how much revenue would come in) there would have been an ever increasing amount of people qualifying for the program. More and more employers would loose the incentive to provide adequate coverage. Why would they give something that the government is providing? Also the government would have constant pressure to expand the limit to who is covered. Who wants to be the one to decide where the coverage ends? How many people could get elected saying “you don’t get covered, vote for me”? If you don’t understand human nature, look at history, you will see this pattern.
Then there is the whole history of government involvement in paying for things. Every time the government gets involved prices rise and/or quality decreases. People tend to charge more if someone is willing to pay more. No one is more willing to pay than a government official because it cost him nothing. He’s far less likely to question why things cost as much as they do and he is far to busy to investigate the thousands of bills that would be crossing his desk. It’s a scary thing to put our health care in the hands of the Oregon state government.
We need to find real solutions to people not being able to afford health care and to the problem of our kids starting to smoke. This ballot measure not only did neither it would have made some things worse.
Good riddance to a bad ballot measure
|
|
|
|
|