The Earthtimes online News
Home

British Court Rules 'Inconvenient Truth' Represents 'Partisan Political Views,' Requires School Disclaimer

Posted : Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:30:52 GMT
Author : The Heartland Institute
Category : Press Release
News Alerts by Email click here )
Create your own RSS
News | Home

CHICAGO, Oct. 9  /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On October 2, 2007 a British court found Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, to be politically biased, and it ruled teachers must warn students of that bias before showing the film.
In the statement below, James M. Taylor, senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute, elaborates on factual errors in the film identified by the court and comments on the ruling. You may quote from this statement or contact Taylor directly at 941/776-5690, taylor@heartland.org.
"Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, represents 'partisan political views' and must be treated as such by teachers in British schools, a British High Court judge has indicated.
"The British court was swayed by numerous factual inaccuracies portrayed in the movie. Among them:
-- The film claims global warming is responsible for the gradual retreat of the alpine glacier atop Africa's Mount Kilimanjaro. Scientists have conclusively demonstrated no such link exists.
-- The film presents graphs indicating that fluctuating carbon dioxide levels have always preceded and caused global temperature fluctuations. In fact, temperature changes have always preceded carbon dioxide changes.
-- The film suggests global warming caused Hurricane Katrina. Few hurricane experts believe this, and substantial scientific evidence indicates global warming is having no impact on hurricane frequency or intensity.
-- The film asserts global warming is causing Central Africa's Lake Chad to dry up. In fact, land use practices are causing the drying up of Lake Chad, and Central Africa is in an unusual and prolonged wet period.
-- The film asserts global warming is leading to polar bear deaths by drowning. Yet the only documented drowning deaths occurred due to a freak storm, and polar bear numbers are growing substantially.
-- The film claims global warming threatens to halt the Gulf Stream and initiate a new ice age. The vast majority of scientists who have studied the issue have determined such a scenario is implausible.
-- The film asserts global warming is causing the destruction of coral reefs through bleaching. Scientists have identified other causes for coral bleaching and have additionally noted bleaching is a natural process by which coral continually selects ideal symbiotic algae.
-- The film asserts Greenland is in danger of rapid ice melt that will raise sea levels by 20 feet or more. The scientific consensus is that any foreseeable Greenland ice melt will be gradual and will take centuries to substantially raise sea levels.
-- The film asserts the Antarctic ice shelf is melting. In fact, only a small portion of Antarctica is getting warmer and losing ice mass, while the vast majority of Antarctica is in a prolonged cold spell and is accumulating ice mass.
"Also highlighted in court arguments was Al Gore's admission in Grist Magazine that 'I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it [global warming] is.'
"As a result of the partisan political nature of Gore's film, school teachers will not be allowed to show the movie without telling their students the film is scientifically controversial.
"The British High Court properly recognized that Al Gore's movie is nine parts political propaganda and one part science. Virtually every assertion that Gore makes in the movie has been strongly contradicted by sound science.
"The British court decision should guide teachers in the U.S. to similarly treat Gore's movie as the inaccurate and misleading propaganda tool that it is."
For more information about The Heartland Institute, please contact Harriette Johnson, media relations manager, at 312/377-4000, email hjohnson@heartland.org.
The Heartland Institute

Copyright © 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.




Article : British Court Rules 'Inconvenient Truth' Represents 'Partisan Political Views,' Requires School Disclaimer
Print this article
Share this article

Stay Updated

News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader
Share on

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 
Your Comments

Al Gore is nothing but a GREAT BIG FAT LIAR.
By: Marcus Maximus , Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:57:03 GMT

Those who buy into all the global warming crap should do a little more research. Historically the Earth has warmed and cooled many, many times - it is no more our fault than other natural occurances like earthquakes, tornadoes, and Hillary Clinton - all of which are major distructive forces that we have little or no control over. I remember when I was a kid the Scientists were telling us the Earth was cooling and that we were heading into a new ice age... and that was just 30 years ago.


This just do not make sense
By: Ju , Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:20:12 GMT

First, I'm not american, so I do not care about Al Gore, or political view, but One thing is for sure in what world is the population of Polar Bears increasing??????
Not in the year of 2007, not in the planet called Earth!!!!!!


who's biased?
By: rick shide , Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:06:22 GMT

I am disheartened by the British court ruling, a ruling that was swayed by biased statements such as this. The ruling would not have happened if the court had done due-diligence in discovering the facts.

The Heartland Institute is a right-wing organization often featured on shows such as Hannity and Colms and The O'Reilly Factor. They argue against the overwhelming agreement about global warming amongst scientists, as documented in the latest report by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The basic conclusions on global warming, those denied by The Heartland Institute, have been endorsed by at least 30 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.

Anyone willing to do independent research on the claim of "inaccuracies" stated in this press release will only find support for them by people tied to the energy industry, independent non-biased scientists support Al Gore's conclusions.

It is interesting to note that The Heartland Institute has current and past board members from ExxonMobile, and have received over half a million dollars in funding from ExxonMobile.


Disappointment
By: Tania , Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:53:54 GMT

I can't believe scientists can be so naive. The day will come when the earth will show us the truth (sooner than you think) and these so called scientists will be feeling pretty remorseful. I just hope they can live with themselves. I totally support Al Gore and his endeavour to show the world what we as humans are doing to our planet...our home. It is truly sad.


The real Inconvenient Truth
By: Stephen Ventura , Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:11:07 GMT

Finally, a succinct and comprehensive rebuttal to Algore's assertions.




Choose Theme
Green Earth Blue Earth Orange Earth Purple Earth

Search
 
You can

Current News

News Category
Business
Entertainment
Environment
General
Health
Sports
Technology
World
Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

About us | News Archives | Browse old Archive | Feedback | Disclaimer | Mobile/PDA | News Alerts

The views expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of earthtimes.org and we accept no responsibility for the views or opinions
expressed in the articles either direct or indirect.

© 2008 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy