Circumcision Atrocity Suit Filed Against Coles County Hospital
|
| Posted
:
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:26:04 GMT |
| Author
:
Latherow Law Office |
| Category
:
Press Release |
| News
Alerts by Email click
here ) |
|
|
|
News |
Home
|
|
|
MATTOON, Ill., July 18 /PRNewswire/ -- The day after birth on February 15, 2007, an infant at Sarah Bush Hospital had a standard circumcision procedure performed by Dr. Sherif Malek. However, what should have been a forgotten memory for the boy became a lifelong nightmare. Due to negligence, Dr. Malek severed the entire glans, commonly termed the head, of the infant's penis. Today, Jerry A. Latherow of Latherow Law Office on behalf of plaintiffs Boy Doe (the infant) and his mother, Jane Doe, filed a complaint for compensation for damages against Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System, Inc, 1000 Health Center Drive, Mattoon, IL, and Sherif Malek, D.O. in the Circuit Court of Coles County, Illinois.
The infant was a healthy seven pound newborn who was delivered without complications on February 14, 2007. The following day, a routine circumcision was performed on the infant by Dr. Malek using a Mogen clamp, a metal, hinge-shaped device used during the procedure. At the completion of the circumcision, hospital records indicated there was significant bleeding. Inspection of the penis revealed nearly all of the glans had been amputated at the time of the circumcision. Three months later, the infant required penile skin transfer surgery at the University of Illinois, with need for future procedures, some of which are only appropriate at the age of puberty.
According to medical expert witness, Dr. David Zbaraz with Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, who reviewed the Sarah Bush medical records of the infant, "The Mogen clamp when used properly cannot amputate a male infant's glans. The injury to this boy was completely preventable."
Across the United States major settlements have been made for botched circumcisions. In 1991, a hospital in Atlanta, GA, agreed to pay $22.8 million because of negligence during a circumcision. Also in New York City a boy received $1.2 million for a circumcision error, and in Lake Charles, LA a family received $2.75 million after a boy's penis was burned during a routine circumcision.
"Through simple carelessness at Sarah Bush Hospital, a boy will face physical disfigurement and psychological trauma throughout his life," said Jerry A. Latherow, the attorney representing Boy Doe and Jane Doe, "Unfortunately, caps on medical malpractice cases in Illinois will prevent the boy from recovering more than $500,000 against the physician for the lifelong deformity and urological care, and any associated psychological problems. Sadly, the hospital's liability for such damages is capped at $1 million. Even before the case is tried, a mother and her child have been robbed."
A complete copy of the complaint is available upon request.
About Jerry A. Latherow
Jerry A. Latherow is a veteran trial lawyer who has attained verdicts and settlements for his clients in cases involving medical malpractice, vehicular and construction liability, and airplane crash cases. In 2003, he was recognized by the National Law Journal as obtaining one of the top 100 verdicts in the country.
CONTACTS:
Jerry A. Latherow, attorney for plaintiffs: 312-372-0052 (o),
312-520-0052 (c)
Patty Peterson, Sarah Bush Hospital: (217) 258-2420
Tom Ciesielka, TC Public Relations: 312-422-1333
Latherow Law Office
CONTACT: Jerry A. Latherow, attorney for plaintiffs, +1-312-372-0052, cell, +1-312-520-0052; or Patty Peterson of Sarah Bush Hospital, +1-217-258-2420; or Tom Ciesielka of TC Public Relations, +1-312-422-1333, tc@tcpr.net, for Latherow Law Office
Web site: http://www.latherowlaw.com/
|
Copyright © 2008
PR Newswire. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dr. Malek MOVED ????
By:
R. Owens ,
Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:45:30 GMT |
|
In two weeks the Dr. Malek SOLD AND MOVED to some place that people don't know what happen !!! only to do the same thing again ???
My mom had what was to be a simple surgery at SARA BUSH and she died 4 days later ,, autopsies showed a cut stomach wall .... Will this Doctor move on to practice on someone else in another town ???
WE NEED TO PUT A STOP TO THE PRACTICE ON OUR LOVED ONES !!!!!
|
|
Circumcisions are unethical
By:
Tommy ,
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:39:01 GMT |
|
I hope plaintiff's attorney as a condition of settlement demands that the hospital agree to ban circumcisions on their premises. It would be nice to see this happen. My guess is the hospital would rather pay the damages then agree to such a term.
|
|
Circumcision
By:
Tom ,
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:34:33 GMT |
|
It gives me much pleasure to know that the hospital is insured only for one million dollars. I hope the plaintiffs try to get the hospital to ban circumcisions in their facility as a condition of settlement.
|
|
The Risks
By:
Joe in Cali ,
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:51:16 GMT |
|
Many staunch supporters of routine infant circumcision assert that "the benefits far outweigh the risks."
Well? DO they?
|
|
'The Benefits Far Outweigh The Risks...'
By:
KogeJoe ,
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:04:40 GMT |
|
Well then, all you circumcision advocates out there, is this risk worth it???
Krysta, if this little boy became a father, I wonder if he would like his son to "look like him..."
|
|
Help raise awareness of these risks
By:
zipchil ,
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:22:49 GMT |
|
This story is heartbreaking. This is not an acceptable risk for a totally unnecessary surgery on a baby. Nobody deserves to have their genitals cut, but this boy will have it far far worse than most.
Unfortunately, most parents who allow their sons to be circumcised don't fully understand these risks, and that there's no reason to have the surgery at all.
If you want to raise some awareness, Digg this article:
http://digg.com/health/Digg_This_Illinois_Boy_Loses_Glans_During_Optional_Circumcision_Surgey
|
|
it's made that way for a reason
By:
Krysta ,
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:19:09 GMT |
|
The foreskin is there for protection. If it's left alone, the glans doesn't become calloused & insensitive. There is RARELY any medical necessity for circumcision (not never, but rarely).
We're disgusted / outraged by people who genitally mutilate girls... When will the routine genital mutilation of boys face the same public outcry?
For those who whine that "he won't look like his daddy" or "won't look like the other boys", after a single generation of non-mutilation, those arguments will be void.
|
|
circumcisions are elective
By:
Brian ,
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:18:40 GMT |
|
Circumcision is not medically necessary. I hope parents on the fence will read these types of news stories to push them into electing not to consent to circumcision.
|
|
|
|
|