WASHINGTON, July 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A new report shows farmers in most districts represented by freshman members of Congress would benefit if Congress shifted some farm subsidies to voluntary USDA conservation programs.
The study, "Freshman Economics: Subsidy Reform Would Help More Farmers in Freshman Districts," shows that farmers in 36 out of 55 freshman congressional districts would receive more support from USDA by shifting "direct" payments to provide more funding for voluntary USDA conservation programs. In addition, farmers in 12 districts would see little or no change from farm policy reform proposals.
Congress is debating a new five-year Farm Bill this summer and the House Agriculture Committee will consider whether to extend the current Farm Bill next week.
"Helping farmers help the environment would also ensure that more farmers and more regions receive a fair share of federal farm spending," said Scott Faber, Farm and Food Policy Campaign Director for Environmental Defense. "Freshmen members who vote against reform and for the status quo are voting against the interests of their own farmers."
Unlike farm subsidies linked to market conditions, direct payments are subsidies linked to a farmer's production history and paid regardless of current crop prices or production. Most farmers do no grow crops eligible for the direct payments, and the largest 10 percent of direct payment recipients collect 60 percent of all payments.
Environmental Defense examined three scenarios -- shifting $10 billion, $15 billion, and $20 billion over five years to USDA conservation programs -- and found that farmers represented by following freshman members of the House from Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Wisconsin would benefit:
Democrats
Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ)
Jerry McNerney (D-CA)
Joe Courtney (D-CT)
Christopher S. Murphy (D-CT)
Kathy Castor (D-FL)
Ron Klein (D-FL)
Tim Mahoney (D-FL)
Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI)
John A. Yarmuth (D-KY)
John P. Sarbanes (D-MD)
Keith Ellison (D-MN)
Paul W. Hodes (D-NH)
Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH)
Michael A. Arcuri (D-NY)
Kirsten E. Gillibrand (D-NY)
John J. Hall (D-NY)
Heath Shuler (D-NC)
Zachary T. Space (D-OH)
Charles A. Wilson (D-OH)
Jason Altmire (D-PA)
Christopher P. Carney (D-PA)
Patrick J. Murphy (D-PA)
Joe Sestak (D-PA)
Ciro Rodriquez (D-TX)
Peter Welch (D-VT)
Steve Kagen MD (D-WI)
Republicans
Kevin McCarthy (R-CA)
Doug Lamborn (R-CO)
Gus M. Bilirakis (R-FL)
Vern Buchanan (R-FL)
Bill Sali (R-ID)
Peter J. Roskam (R-IL)
Michele Bachmann (R-MN)
Dean Heller (R-NV)
Mary Fallin (R-OK)
David Davis (R-TN)
"Reforming farm policies would allow many more farmers to participate in USDA conservation programs," Faber said. "Two out of three farmers are turned away when they offer to share the cost of clean water and wildlife habitat because of our misplaced spending priorities."
For a breakdown of how farmers in freshman congressional districts would fare under these scenarios and to see the full report, visit http://www.environmentaldefense.org/farms.
Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. http://www.environmentaldefense.org/
Contact:
Scott Faber, sfaber@environmentaldefense.org, (202)230-1899-c
Sean Crowley, scrowley@environmentaldefense.org, (202)572-3331-w
Environmental Defense
CONTACT: Scott Faber, +1-202-230-1899 (cell),
sfaber@environmentaldefense.org, or Sean Crowley, +1-202-572-3331,
scrowley@environmentaldefense.org, both of Environmental Defense
Web site: http://www.environmentaldefense.org/
