The Earthtimes online News
Home

Al Gore Confronted by Own Scientists - 'Confusion Between Hypothesis and Evidence'

Posted : Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:20:00 GMT
Author : The Heartland Institute
Category : Press Release
News Alerts by Email click here )
Create your own RSS
News | Home

CHICAGO, June 28  /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- In a historic move, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has released the expert review comments and responses to its latest assessment of the science of climate change. The IPCC report is the primary source of data for Al Gore's movie and book titled "An Inconvenient Truth."
Many of the comments by the reviewers are strongly critical of claims contained in the final report, and are directly at odds with the so-called "scientific consensus" touted by Gore and others calling for immediate government action. For example, the following comment by Eric Steig appears in Second Order Draft Comments, Chapter 6; section 6-42:
In general, the certainty with which this chapter presents our understanding of abrupt climate change is overstated. There is confusion between hypothesis and evidence throughout the chapter, and a great deal of confusion on the differences between an abrupt "climate change" and possible, hypothetical causes of such climate changes.
"It is now abundantly clear why Al Gore will not accept our debate challenge. The supposed scientific consensus on global warming is pure fiction. Hopefully, the public release of comments and responses will enable the debate over global warming to turn to facts and less fiction," stated Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute, a national nonprofit think tank based in Chicago.
The Heartland Institute has been running ads in national newspapers calling on Al Gore to debate Lord Christopher Monckton, a prominent global warming "skeptic." Starting today, the institute says it is now including Dennis Avery, an economist and coauthor of a book on global warming that is on the New York Times nonfiction bestseller list, who Gore has also refused to debate.
To view the IPCC expert comments, go to http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Comments/wg1-commentFrameset.html.p> For more information about the challenge to Al Gore to debate his critics, go to http://www.heartland.org/.
The Heartland Institute
CONTACT: Tom Swiss of the Heartland Institute, +1-312-377-4000,
+1-773-485-9477, tswiss@heartland.org
Web site: http://www.heartland.org/

Copyright © 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.




Article : Al Gore Confronted by Own Scientists - 'Confusion Between Hypothesis and Evidence'
Print this article
Share this article

Stay Updated

News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader
Share on

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 
Your Comments

IPCC Expert Review
By: Marcus , Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:17:42 GMT

Wow - you cite a critical comment by Eric Steig to indicate that there is a lack of consensus in the climate change issue. The same Eric Steig who is a major contributors to realclimate.org? In fact, I think he would likely support government action, and state that there is indeed a strong scientific consensus on the climate change issue.

Denialists are stretching the truth, misleading, and outright lying more and more often in a desperate attempt to try and persuade the public that there is no consensus on this issue. It is sad, reprehensible, and worthy of censure.




Choose Theme
Green Earth Blue Earth Orange Earth Purple Earth

Search
 
You can

Current News

News Category
Business
Entertainment
Environment
General
Health
Sports
Technology
World
Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

About us | News Archives | Browse old Archive | Feedback | Disclaimer | Mobile/PDA | News Alerts

The views expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of earthtimes.org and we accept no responsibility for the views or opinions
expressed in the articles either direct or indirect.

© 2008 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy