Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Trust fund cash goes to in vitro kids

Posted : Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:44:54 GMT
By : General News Editor
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
NEW YORK, Aug. 2 A New York judge ruled two children created using frozen sperm after their father's death are entitled to a cut of the family fortune.

Renee Roth, in New York Surrogate Court, ruled that the grandchildren of a man identified in court as Martin B. are eligible to receive cash from his trust funds, despite the non-existence of in vitro fertilization when the trusts were created in 1969, the New York Post reported Thursday.

The children, identified as James Mitchell, 2, and Warren, 11 months, had perplexed trustees who were unsure whether to make payments to children because their father, James, died in 2001 -- years before either boy was conceived. The trustees

However, Roth wrote that the children are the biological sons of their father and therefore are entitled to the rights that accompany that relation.

"The human desire to have children, albeit by biotechnology, deserves respect, as do the rights of the children born as a result of such scientific advances," Roth wrote.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Trust fund cash goes to in vitro kids
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.