California moots historic environment legislation

California is all set to enact the strictest state law in the United States to limit greenhouse gas emissions and probably spur the reluctant federal lawmakers in Washington to follow suit.
Posted : Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:06:01 GMT
By : Steve Walters
Category : Environment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Environment News | Home
LOS ANGELES: California is all set to enact the strictest state law in the United States to limit greenhouse gas emissions and probably spur the reluctant federal lawmakers in Washington to follow suit.

The state's governor, Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, and leaders of the Democrat-controlled legislature have reached an agreement on the details of a bill, which is now expected to be passed by the Senate and Assembly, before the legislature session ends at midnight Thursday.

Schwarzenegger, who has been at loggerheads with president George Bush in matters relating to the environment, described the agreement as historic and hoped it will help California to become a world leader in reducing carbon emissions. The success of the system will be an example for other states and nations to follow as the fight against climate change continues, he said in a statement.

While the final version of the bill, called the Global Warming Solutions Act, is not yet made public, sources said the legislation will force the state's heavy industry, electric utilities and refineries to cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 25 per cent by 2020, which in turn will return the emissions to the 1990 levels. The companies would be allowed to trade emission allowances in the market, as is done in the U.S. with regard to sulfur dioxide.

Schwarzenegger said he had secured word from the legislative leaders that they would be flexible in changing the program if it adversely impacts the state economically.

According to environmentalists, the United States is the world's largest producer of the heat-trapping gases that are commonly linked to changes in weather like violent hurricanes and rising sea levels. The country has withdrawn from the 160-nation Kyoto Protocol to cut greenhouse gas emissions in 2001, saying the curbs will adversely affect the its economy and that the protocol had unfairly excluded developing countries like China.

Policy experts said the California law could have major impact on Washington's environmental policy. Many feel the companies appear to be ahead of politicians on global warming and are in favor of a national framework on reducing emissions rather than a spate of state regulations.

Schwarzenegger ensured that the legislation includes a market-based system that will eventually give companies tools to meet emissions targets, like carbon credit trading.

The legislation empowers the California Air Resources Board, which enforces the state's air pollution controls, to determine how much industry groups contribute to global warming pollution, to assign emission targets and to set non-compliance penalties. It sets out a two-year time frame, until 2009, to establish how the system will operate and then allows three years, until 2012, for the industries to start their cutbacks. The first major controls are expected to begin in that year.

Governors of New York, New Jersey, Delaware and four New England states had signed an agreement to curb power plant emissions, cutting them by 10 per cent by 2019.

Business captains are not united on this issue. While several leading venture capitalists from Silicon Valley have openly supported the measure, saying it will create new industries and new jobs, California's Chamber of Commerce is opposing it, saying that law will prompt an exodus of industry to other states without greenhouse-gas controls even as the state will be incapacitated in attracting new ventures from outside the states.

California Assembly speaker, Fabian Nunez, Democrat of Los Angeles, and Assemblywoman Fran Pavley, a leading sponsor of the legislation, addressed a conference and said, "We feel that California has always been a leader in protecting the environment."

Nunez said the state has moved it to the next level and that everyone would want to see California carbon free.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : California moots historic environment legislation
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

response
By: jhay , Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:21:01 GMT

I guess Arnold is smarter than Bush huh?


Zero emissions
By: T-1000 , Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:51:49 GMT

Go Arnold! Please bring back the zero emissions, we need other options.


alternative transportation
By: Daniel A. , Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:29:41 GMT

I just have to say that we as a society have become too dependent on the motor power instead of human power. If our state and local officials would implement a nationwide program of creating bicycle pathways,slow lanes for electric scooters,and extensive walkways for pedestrian traffic,not only would carbon dioxide levels decrease dramatically,but create a more fit and non-complacent population.Let us realize that although convenient,cars are NOT the only form of efficient transportation around. Taking exception for the physically impaired where cars are still the most practical way, the majority of us could use the physical and emotional benefits of a slower pace in life.Forgive me for coining the phrase


Global warming
By: Robin Hales , Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:40:12 GMT

Arnie, California well done. New legislation reducing GH gas may well eventually go some way to restoring USA's credibility as a World leader. At the moment it is very very tarnished. Ask yourself, how can anybody put any credance in an administration whose ticket to power is the petroleum lobby. I just hope that the rest of the US follows suit and joins in with the rest of the sane World.


Response to Denny
By: Vince , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:44:44 GMT

In response to Denny, I would have to say that I understand his concerns. But I would suggest that attempts to reverse the environmental damage we have caused may have some negative effects, but we have to decide hat is most important. Do we want to live in a smoggy toxic waste dump with the lowest gas prices and the lowest unemployment? Or would we rather be a leader in trying to improve the environment while still maintaining economic success? I say that it is worth a try.


Leading the Way
By: denny , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:48:32 GMT

Yes, California legislators are leading the way in social legislation. And leading the way towards unemployment, business and industrial flight, gasoline and electricity prices up over the moon, and budget deficits... Lead on California, the rest of the country cannot but benefit from your efforts.


it's not enough...
By: anna , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:55:51 GMT

Arnold's doing a lot....a lot more than anyone else and he'll get cheers and jeers, but it's not enough.
And ..."Governors of New York, New Jersey, Delaware and four New England states had signed an agreement to curb power plant emissions, cutting them by 10 per cent by 2019".
....PUHLEEEEASE!! Whatta JOKE! How about 10% NOW and 25% by 2010??


Schwartzy steps up for the Atmosphere
By: Chris , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:19:50 GMT

Good on ya Schwartzy!!!
Go get em son.
Love your work, don't be purturbed by anyone, stick to it and lead the way.
Greeners.


More problems than greenhouse gasses
By: Jay , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:13:07 GMT

This proposal studies finding leaks in a water system. When a leak occurs (from corrosion, settling of pipes , rocks penetrating, or tree roots) two situations occur:
One is when water flows slowly and leaks out of the pipe to form a slurry that contains
viruses, bacteria ,and protozoa: when the velocity increases venturri effect then takes over and pulls this slurry into the line.

In the one thorough study by EPA in 1989 it was estimated that 25% of hospital beds are occupied by people with water borne illnesses. We propose that free access to knowledge is the best way to address this problem. The grant we are applying for is to help build this endeavor. Seventeen state regulatory bodies currently approve this program. The current process is on the web at http://wateredu.com

This problem contributes to one of the main concerns: The main concerns with water with respect to public health are viruses, bacteria, protozoa, particles and dissolved substances such as lead. Particles small enough to pass through the pore size of the filtering media make it through the system. Disinfectants substantially reduce bacteria. Viruses (polio, etc.) and protozoa’s are relatively unaffected by disinfectants but are significantly reduced by alum and lime treatment processes. Activated carbon also reduces these health threats. Protozoa now grow and multiply in some systems infecting users (cryptosporidium-ravished 400,000 people in Milwaukee 1993 and killed 108 in that city). Normal treatment processes may not minimize Lead and dissolved substances. Natural treatment processes minimize most contaminants. These and other processes are discussed on the site, http://water.me.vccs.edu K-12 and other classes should be done
this way.www.patientlift.net
Benefits

-Increase revenues
-Extend life of system
-Lower cost of treatment
-Less overtime
-Fewer rate increases



freedom on freeways
By: eric , Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:34:19 GMT

why not create a lane for those under 150cc scooters in the city while opening up the speeds outside in the sticks for those that want to make time/e



More Environment News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 
 
My California homepage


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.