Energy | Nature

Albany says 'No' to Bloomberg traffic plan

ALBANY - New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's ambitious plan to impose a charge on drivers who pass through the busiest parts of Manhattan received a shock setback today when Albany lawmakers rejected the initiative.
Posted : Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:39:00 GMT
Author : James Simpson
Category : Environment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Environment News | Home
ALBANY - New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's ambitious plan to impose a charge on drivers who pass through the busiest parts of Manhattan received a shock setback today when Albany lawmakers rejected the initiative.

Bloomberg had proposed the plan as a part of his goal to reduce traffic congestion in the City. However the plan to charge drivers who get caught up in busy traffic leading to congestion did not go down well with lawmakers.

Lawmakers felt Bloomberg's proposal was yet to be tried anywhere in American cities and that there was no roadmap as to how New York would accomplish it. However negotiations continued through into the night on Monday as lawmakers wrestled with the idea.

“All parties have come together in good faith and will continue working together through the day and night to continue narrowing the remaining issues,” Gov. Eliot Spitzer said in a statement.

However Mr Bloomberg was not pleased with Albany lawmakers and accused them of failing to act on key issues like air pollution and climate change.

“While business as usual in Albany may be an impediment to congestion pricing at this time, we can still make a difference for the future of our city and create a greener, greater New York," he added.

Bloomberg also said that he would continue to work on the plan so as to ensure it saw the light of the day. “We will continue to press for real solutions, not interminable study groups whose only real purpose is to avoid accountability and results,” he stressed.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Albany says 'No' to Bloomberg traffic plan
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

Silver's fault
By: Eric , Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:59:50 GMT

Let's put the blame where it belongs. Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (Democrat) wants to put his cronies on a committee to determine if any action is necessary. He kept the Assembly from voting in time to meet the federal deadlines.


Yep, Just a new tax when carpooling is getting popular
By: TrafficBulldogOrg , Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:56:42 GMT

Does anyone else see that this is just a new tax?

I just think the timing of congestion pricing is interesting. At a time when gas prices are high, and global warming is such a concern - that people are looking into carpooling more. The government gets 20% of sales tax revenue from new vehicles; gasoline and registration fees are extra.

If people carpool, then there would be less use of vehicle and thus less sales of new vehicles and gasoline. So, the politicians need to move their addiction to sales taxes of new vehicles and gasoline to a new revenue stream.

And here it is. The government double speak of "congestion pricing".

Look for a new tax on carpooling in the coming years.

They want us to have cars for the taxes and fees....but just to not use them in certain areas or at certain times of day.

Hey I got an idea, why don't the politicians talk about carpooling honestly and it's role in solving traffic, energy, and air pollution issues. And maybe while they are at it, they could get to work removing government waste so that we don't have to be so addicted to oil.

Cause if you notice, the carpool concept is being killed so that they can convert lanes to toll roads just like they have done in California and Florida. All in the name of congestion relief.

http://trafficbulldog.org is a carpool advocacy group committed to helping people form carpools. Carpools take pressure off of the gasoline pricess.... and get a little less money to terrorists.


a
By: a , Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:07:08 GMT

To me it sounds like Bloomberg just want more money in his pocket.



More Environment News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.