Group of 6 studying Iran's response

The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany, which had made a package of incentives to Iran, are studying Iran's offer of more talks to resolve the issue of the country continuing with its uranium enrichment programs, according to sources. It is not clear whether Tehran's response is fair enough to avoid the sanctions threatened by the U.N.
Posted : Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:26:00 GMT
By : Jack Myers
Category : World
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
World News | Home
TEHRAN: The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany, which had made a package of incentives to Iran, are studying Iran's offer of more talks to resolve the issue of the country continuing with its uranium enrichment programs, according to sources. It is not clear whether Tehran's response is fair enough to avoid the sanctions threatened by the U.N.

Iran had responded Tuesday to the set of incentives from the six countries -- China, Russia, France, Germany, Britain and Switzerland (representing the U.S., which has no diplomatic ties with Iran) -- but did not give any assurance to suspend the enrichment of uranium by the end of the month, which is the main demand from the European countries and the U.S.

Iran is said to have offered "serious talks" over its nuclear activities but did not raise the issue of suspending enrichment by 31 August, the deadline set by the U.N. Security Council through a resolution.

According to a senior European official involved in the talks, Iran has not addressed the key point, that is, whether or not it is going to suspend the enrichment program. Details of the contents of Iran's response have not been published so far.

The European and U.S. diplomats are now analyzing the 21-page response and representatives of the U.S., Britain, France and Germany are expected to meet in New York today to discuss the issue and possibly evolve a response. The meeting, however, will not be attended by two key members of the Security Council, Russia and China, which have been suggesting reconciliation of the issue rather than a confrontation. Analysts pointed out both these countries could veto any resolution in the council mooting sanctions against Iran.

The Chinese foreign ministry said in Beijing China has always believed that seeking a peaceful resolution to the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomatic talks is the best choice (to solve the issue) and in the interests of all parties concerned. It hoped that the Iranian side would earnestly consider concerns of the international community and come up with necessary and constructive measures.

The ministry also said China hoped that other parties concerned will "remain calm and patient, show flexibility, stick to the orientation of peaceful resolution (of the issue) and create favorable conditions for resuming talks as soon as possible."

John R. Bolton, the U.S. representative at the U.N., had said Tuesday if Iran refuses to stop the program, the U.S. will introduce a resolution in the Security Council calling for immediate economic sanctions. He said Washington is prepared to move rapidly on this issue.

Earlier Iranian officials had come out saying the country is offering a “new formula” to resolve the crisis, but details were not divulged.

According to neutral diplomats, Iran is now in the process of readying for the sanctions, which may initially be rather mild. But once it covers essential items, which the country needs very badly, it can have devastating effect on the country's economy. For example, even though Iran is world's No 4 producer of crude, it depends on gasoline imports as it does not possess any refinery capacity.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Group of 6 studying Iran's response
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



    Have your Say
    Name
    Email
    Subject
    Your Comment

    Enter Verification code
     
      


     
    Your Comments

    WAR OF THE WORLDS
    By: Joseph Smith , Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:09:17 GMT

    I grew up in the Muslim province of Lanao Sur in the Philippines and have watched as early as 1951 muslims spit hard on the ground the moment the pass the front of the Catholic Church in the town.I have also received the reminders from friends and classmates at that time(1953-1968) that to the muslims "there is no God but Allah and Mohammed is His prophet". And that Christians are infidels. There is inherent hatred in a muslim towards non-believers of Mohammed.

    Lest we all forget, the caliber-45 pistol was manufactured to stop on his tracks the "earliest version of today's terrorist". Back then and here in southern Philippines they are called "huramentado", roughly translates as "suicide swashbackler". Is that not the modern day "suicide bomber". Both kinds believe that to kill an infidel is to go to heaven!

    That is why there will be a third world war. It is inevitable: islam versus all infidels. It will be a fight to the finish. Only one side must surive to have peace. Or both all perish and there will be peace on earth!

    That is from experience! And the time was the early 50's.

    Joseph Smith



    More World News click here
    Follow The Earth Times
    Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
    Share/Save/Bookmark

     
     



     
    Subscribe to free Earthtimes
    News Alerts by Email Click here
    For RSS Feeds Click here
    or Create your own RSS

    Add to Google Toolbar
    Breaking News
    Press Releases

     


    The Earth Times
    News Category

    © 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
    Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.