Tap water may be effective in cleaning wounds

Tap water with all its germs could still be an effective wound cleaner, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Western Sydney. The research conducted in collaboration with Sydney South West Area Health Service is published in The Cochrane Library.
Posted : Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:22:00 GMT
Author : Geoffrey Lewis
Category : Health
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Health News | Home
Tap water with all its germs could still be an effective wound cleaner, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Western Sydney. The research conducted in collaboration with Sydney South West Area Health Service is published in The Cochrane Library.

The research was seeded by the local nurses who wanted to be reassured that showering patients with leg ulcers was safe. "In response we searched for studies done by others on cleansing wounds using the shower, however we were unable to locate any evidence to support the practice," said lead researcher professor Rhonda Griffiths, from the UWS School of Nursing. In order to still provide an answer, the researchers conducted a double blind trial involving 35 patients with 49 wounds. The six-week trial showed that none of the patients treated with tap water showed any sign of infection of their wounds.

The researchers said that the study proved "drinking excess water" was certainly a cost effective method of keeping wounds clean. "We came to the conclusion that where there is access to tap water that is suitable for drinking, it may be as effective – and certainly more cost effective – than other methods," Professor Griffiths observed. "Although the results need to be confirmed by a larger study, we believe that with this simple, yet robust, trial we have uncovered evidence that could save nurses' time, reduce costs and also make it easier to involve patients in their own self-care of wounds."

She added that the research underscored the involvement of healthcare providers in seeking effective, but common solutions to medical problems.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Tap water may be effective in cleaning wounds
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

not
By: megan , Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:24:38 GMT

i do not think that tap water is a wound cleaner in any way. because when i was 7 years old i had to get stichs in my hand cause i got cut by a clean knife and when i got to the hospital my grandmother when we was at home she poured tap water on it when the doctor looked at it he said it was infected.


But would you drink chlorine?
By: Chris , Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:13:28 GMT

Sounds like another cost cutting measure the hospital's could use to (make) even more money than they do now.

Fact is chlorine's added to water to kill off some contaminants. Filtering (out) the chlorine from the Tap Water is a good idea.

Solid carbon block technology is considered the most effective method for reducing contaminants of health concern. In addition to the removal of cysts, a solid carbon block filter also
reduces:
· chemicals;
· pesticides;
· herbicides;
· disinfection byproducts;
· heavy metals;
· cysts;
· asbestos
· particulates
· chlorine.
. Arsenic

Visit: www.WaterFilterFacts.com




tap chlorine?
By: TheAngryPatient (c) , Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:24:12 GMT

It ought to clean wounds - it's got enough chlorine in it these days that our insides are getting pickled!!




More Health News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.