Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Start-up of virtual border fence postponed

Posted : Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:26:00 GMT
By : General News Editor
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
SASABE, Ariz., June 26 The start-up date for Project 28, nine towers designed to scan 28 miles of border between Arizona and Mexico, has been put off.

The towers equipped with cameras, radar and other electronic devices were scheduled to go online June 13, The New York Times reported. No new date has been set.

Boeing Corp. won a $67 million contract for Project 28 and similar stretches of towers. Problems with the cameras and radar scanners are responsible for the delays, the Times said.

The high-tech virtual tech is the key component of the Secure Border Initiative or SBInet, the Times said, along with old-fashioned fences and border guards. The Bush administration estimates the total cost of SBInet at $7.6 billion through 2011, but the Government Accountability Office has suggested that the likely cost is likely to be much higher.

"We are living the dividing line between the old Border Patrol and the new patrol of the future," David Aguilar, chief of the Border Patrol, told the Times.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Start-up of virtual border fence postponed
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.