Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Global military spending reaches new high

Stockholm - Global military spending, mainly driven by the United States and its ongoing  war on terrorism,  rose to a new high in 2006, a respected peace institute said Monday in Stockholm. Last year, nations around the world spent 1,204 billion dol...
Posted : Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:02:01 GMT
Author : DPA
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
Stockholm - Global military spending, mainly driven by the United States and its ongoing "war on terrorism," rose to a new high in 2006, a respected peace institute said Monday in Stockholm. Last year, nations around the world spent 1,204 billion dollars (current rates) in military expenditures which equalled 184 dollars per capita, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said.

The increase was 3.5 per cent in real terms on 2005, and 37 per cent on the 10-year-period 1997-2006, the SIPRI Yearbook said.

The US accounted for some 62 per cent or 26 billion dollars of the total 39-billion-dollar increase in world military expenditure in 2006.

The US had a 46-per-cent share of world military spending. The other top four military spenders - Britain, France, China and Japan - each accounted for 4 to 5 per cent.

In its overview, SIPRI said that Western Europe and Central America were the only regions with a decrease in military expenditure in 2006.

Russia's military expenditure rose by almost 12 per cent in real terms last year, a trend that started in 1998.

In the Middle East, accurate figures for spending were hard to come by but Saudi Arabia remained the largest regional spender, followed by Israel and Iran, SIPRI said.

In Africa, Algeria remained a leading military spender that in 2006 signed arms deals with Russia worth 10.5 billion dollars.

China surpassed Japan as the biggest military spender in Asia, and became the world's fourth largest military spender in 2006.

India remained the main military spender in South Asia. According to SIPRI, China and India accounted for 40 per cent of the region's spending.

Combined arms sales from the world's top 100 companies, not including China, totalled 290 billion dollars for 2005, the latest year covered by SIPRI.

Of the 100 companies, 40 were US-based, and accounted for 63 per cent of arms sales, SIPRI said. The 32 European companies had a 29- percent-share while nine in Russia, accounted for 2 per cent of sales. Companies in Japan, Israel and India had most of the remainder.

The US and Russia were the world's largest arms exporters 2002- 2006, accounting for some 30 per cent each. China and India were the world's largest importers. Other large importers were Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

In its annual outlook, the institute said there were 17 major armed conflicts (defined as at least 1,000 killed in battle) in 2006. Asia was the region with the most armed conflicts.

The yearbook also contained chapters on peacekeeping operations which reached a new high in the number of personnel deployed, attempts to contain the spread of nuclear weapons, energy and security.

The Swedish parliament created SIPRI as an independent foundation in 1966.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Global military spending reaches new high
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.