Universe grew from pea-size to astronomical size in an instant: WMAP data
|
|
|
| Posted
:
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:06:00 GMT |
| By
:
Renin Paul |
| Category
:
Space |
| News Alerts by
Email ( click
here ) |
|
Space News |
Home
|
|
|
|
NASA's deep space probe has sent evidence of, what scientists believe, must have been the edge of time – the first instant after the Big Bang when the universe grew from a size smaller than a pea to astronomical dimensions. The tremendous expansion took place with a single burst of repulsive force and in less than a trillionth of a trillionth of a second, the agency's scientists said.
The robotic probe Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, launched in 2001, relayed data that supported the theory that the universe was 13.7 billion years old. It also provided new evidence that the universe grew from “submicroscopic size to astronomical size in less than the blink of an eye” according to Charles Bennett, who heads NASA's investigation team for the WMAP spacecraft and also works for John Hopkins University.
The WMAP probe sent images tracing the movement of the oldest lights of the universe. The spacecraft is equipped to trace and measure movements of the Big Bang's afterglow - the microwave background light. The scientists explained that radiation from the Big bang would have lingered in space and become much cooler than their initial intense temperatures, over the passing 13.7 billion years.
In 2003, the NASA team had published a detailed picture of the beginning of the universe with data sent by the WMAP. Over the past three years, the probe has been sending consistent data about the temperatures of the cosmic microwave background light. Based on this data, scientists said they had “the most precise measurements of our infant universe”.
The image they released is an ovaloid picture of the infant universe marked in spots and bars. The spots representing areas of the universe are colored either blue or red depending upon their temperatures and the white bars represent direction of the oldest lights. This data enables the scientists to determine where the first stars must have formed.
The entire image is based on tiny temperature variations – very faint microwaves actually, observed in the universe, as the scientists believe the infant universe was nothing but a tiny mass of energies and infinitesimal differences in temperatures. These tiny temperature differences eventually led to the formation of matter, including all the countless galaxies and stars.
The WMAP probe is now on the other side of the Sun roughly 1.6km away from Earth. It is expected to be operational for another four years.
Based on the probe's recent observations the scientists also revised their estimate of when the first stars began to shine, from the earlier stated 200 million years, to 400 million years after the Big Bang.
The probe's observations have upturned all previous hypothesis and theories about the beginnings of the universe but supported the Big Bang theory. The universe contains only 4 percent of identifiable matter, while 22 percent is “so-called dark matter” – neither made of atoms nor emitting/absorbing light. This dark matter is only detected by it gravity. The remaining 74 percent is an unknown “dark energy” that could probably be causing the universe to expand, scientists believe.
The WMAP team said the universe is currently on another growth spurt but fortunately this one is far “more gentle than the one 13.7 billion years ago”.
Copyright,
respective author or news agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Universe grew from pea-size
By:
Terry Collins ,
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:37:01 GMT
|
|
If before the big bang everything was contained in something the size of a pea, what was the weight of the pea and what supported it. What shape is the universe now and do we know where the centre is and what is in the centre?. Do scientists really understand all this or do they come up with a theory to baffle people like me. I cannot understand any of it. Regards TC
|
|
Expansion of the Universe
By:
Robert van de Walle ,
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:42:52 GMT
|
|
Admittedly, this is pretty hard stuff to understand. Just like it's hard to understand that the Earth is a round ball if your only viewpoint is from the surface. It sure looks flat, doesn't it?
It's as we explore that we come to things that don't make sense. Then we have to invent a new description, on that is a better fit for what we find out. Imagine you go looking for the edge of the Earth, and after a lifetime of travel towards the dawn, you end up back at home. You'd have to come up with a description that fit the new fact, that you never found an edge.
The Big Bang is sort of like this: all the other explanations aren't working. We start close to home and see some odd things (like our Milky Way should fly apart, it's spinning so fast, but it doesn't, so there must be some kind of unseen stuff holding it together) and as we look deeper into space we see more odd things, such as all pieces of the Universe are running away from each other. So they must have been all crammed together at some point in the distant past.
The speeds suggest one age for the Universe, but the oldest stars suggest another. The best way to solve this problem is to imagine the Universe grew unimaginably fast at first, and then slowed way down. Since it's space itself that grew, the limit of the speed of light gets bypassed.
There's a whole lot more to the story, but if you are really interested, there are lots and lots of resources to learn from.
|
|
Cool
By:
Jack Meoff ,
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:10:02 GMT
|
|
well i dont know much about the universe. I am only in the 8th grade, but I think the hole thing is cool. but one thing how cold the universe get so big so fast I thought light cold not be passed. And if I am right wich I bet i am not. It would tack years,and I just know some geek is calling me a dumb ass. So maby some 1 cold explain it to me by posting somthing it wold be most helpful
|
|
limits of the universe
By:
Vikas Sharma ,
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:45:01 GMT
|
|
this would always bug me wherez the beginning and wherez the end of the universe. If there are any, watz beyond that. Mind and matter are two different things. Mind could be anti-matter as well since it has no physical existence. Spiritualists won't say it and science would never prove the mystery of time, life, and universe. It might be an attempt for a change or time pass.
|
|
Universe grew from pea-size to astronomical size in an instant: WMAP data
By:
Stan Kabacinski ,
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:35:19 GMT
|
|
I don't believe it at all.
Our scientists never seriously discussed the nature of physics itself and base their knowledge and calculations on flawed assumptions, like that there is a
|
|
religion and science
By:
Rene Tingleff ,
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:52:38 GMT
|
|
"Subject : God is the Creator
By: Mike Akerib | on : Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:33:36 GMT
Comment :
The instanteous beginning proves that God created the universe. No other being could have created such things in so fast a time and from so small as a marble. As for His identity, that remains to be seen because our three great religions would each claim God as their God and that would lead to chaos, God forbid."
Any proof that there are a god? Any proof that your religion is true? I guess not. End of that matter and let science solve the problem how the universe was created.
|
|
Pea sized universe seed
By:
Stan Karabin of Dundalk,Md ,
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:07:09 GMT
|
|
Remember matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time. If one was to calculate all the matter in the known universe and shape it into a pea...it will be a very large pea. The theorists are using mind expanding drugs to think a seed grew into a universe. They are grasping at straws. Is this writer using and listening to "Yellow Submarine"?
Great theory though!
|
|
universe growth
By:
ronny shadix ,
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:32:00 GMT
|
|
are you telling me their are people sitting around getting paid to look at something almost no one understands, and we are to believe what they say??? Get a real job, help someone, build something useful, it does not matter where of how we got here, look forward to living and loveing the planet we now have.
|
|
God?
By:
Jim ,
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:15:10 GMT
|
|
Mike,
Sorry, no proof - It could be that our universe was created as particles slammed into one another in a supercollider of a very much larger race of some very curious beings.
If you can wrap your head around that one, I congratulate you.
|
|
God is the Creator
By:
Mike Akerib ,
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:33:36 GMT
|
|
The instanteous beginning proves that God created the universe. No other being could have created such things in so fast a time and from so small as a marble. As for His identity, that remains to be seen because our three great religions would each claim God as their God and that would lead to chaos, God forbid.
|
|
Universe grew from pea-size to astronomical size in an instant: WMAP data
By:
Adnan Hasan ,
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:40:05 GMT
|
|
Very nice research.
|
|
|
|
|