Games | Internet | Science | Space

Dinosaur impact on mammals disputed

Posted : Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:37:00 GMT
By : Science News Editor
Category : Science (Technology)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Science Technology News | Home
ATHENS, Ga., March 28 U.S. and European researchers are challenging the idea that the mass extinction of dinosaurs played a major role in the evolution of mammals.

The report, published in the journal Nature, contains a new evolutionary tree for mammals that puts the major diversification of today's mammals long after a die-off of the dinosaurs some 65 million years ago.

"We have found that when you fuse all of the molecular trees with the fossil evidence, the timing does not work," University of Georgia Institute of Ecology Director John Gittleman said in a release. "The preponderance of mammals really didn't take off until 10 (million) to 15 million years after the demise of the dinosaurs." Scientists combined more than 2,500 partial "trees" constructed using molecular data and the fossil record to create the first virtually complete mammalian tree. Lead author Olaf Bininda-Emonds of the University of Jena, Germany, says

the mammals we know today "are actually quite old and just flew under the radar of everything that was out there."

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Dinosaur impact on mammals disputed
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More Science (Technology) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.