Dung fossils reveal the grass was green for the foodie Dinos
|
|
|
| Posted
:
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:02:00 GMT |
| Author
:
Ravi Chopra |
| Category
:
Environment |
| News
Alerts by Email ( click
here ) |
|
|
|
Environment News |
Home
|
|
|
The apparent indiscriminate foodies, dinosaurs appear to have been hearty grass eaters more than 65 million years ago. But the surprise is that it was much before we ever believed that grass grew on the vast terrains of the Earth. This revelation has come from a new analysis of dinosaur dung that is detailed in the Science journal.
So long scientists have held that grass growth on Earth gained ground only after the dinosaurs disappeared. But the large remnants of the Dino feces reveal a totally different picture. Now they view the probability that grass, not the only vegetarian component of a dinosaur meal eaten alongside other plants, served an important part of the early mammal's food. Caroline Strömberg of the Swedish Museum of Natural History and her team have many reasons to favor this view after studying mineral remnants preserved in the 65-67-million-year old dung fossils.
The fossils retrieved from central India, called coprolites are believed to belong to the large vegetarian titanosaur sauropods. Ms Strömberg told, "It's difficult to tell how widespread (grazing) was”.
But the new study came after paleontologists from India's Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany were stumped by the presence of phytoliths in the fossils called for expert help. Shedding light on the Earth's vegetation so many million years ago, the phytoliths in the fossils were actually mineral remnants of different grasses. With five types of grass identified by researchers in these phytoliths, it appears that grasses itself had undergone some change since the dinosaurs inhabited the Earth.
Today the grasses with their high silica content are not as easy to chew and possibly evolved to be so to avoid consumption by herbivores during large-scale grazing as a response to the patterns that existed in the Cenozoic era. But that theory points to the possibility that this defense was raised in response to grazing by dinosaurs. But with other small mammals that existed alongside the dinosaurs also likely to have been grass eaters, it is difficult to accord dinosaurs the sole blame for the development.
However, with most textbooks portraying dinosaurs feeding on grass, it appears that man had some premonition of the dinosaurs' grassy diet. Strömberg who specialized in phytoliths, found the presence of their distinctive shapes unique to grass in the dung "a complete shock". Further the phytoliths, compared to undistinguishable fossil pollen found pertaining to the same period, revealed the exciting prospect of the grasses being more evolved. Strömberg even hazarded that they had been several metres tall, when the dinosaurs savored them.
The discovery may also serve as a fillip to another mysterious mammalian existence of the period of the creatures termed as gondwanatherians that are understood to have had high-crowned teeth. Until now paleontologists believed these creatures of the Cretaceous period to have used the teeth to bite through wood since grasses were not known to have existed.
Now it is clear that they too savored a taste for grass like the dinosaurs and therefore had developed their own bodily tools to help them in this direction. While the earliest grass fossils trace their existence to 55 million years ago, the new discovery in Dinosaur dung traces them to nearly 100 million years ago.
Copyright,
respective author or news agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
moron, eh?
By:
becky ,
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:22:28 GMT |
|
hey edward, take a historical geology class. Though grass may seem simple, it is not. Just like snakes seem simple, they are relatively "new".
who is the moron here?
|
|
lucky
By:
bas ,
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:57:52 GMT |
|
what a marvellous?
|
|
stooopid people
By:
J.Leigh ,
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:15:33 GMT |
|
wow. the the intelligent design(creationism) debates spilling into paleological discovery articles is riddiculus. Just accept the fact that we will never know what's going on untill after we're dead. Whether or not someone or something decided to suddenly create a planet and populate it or if life evolved over a great deal of time, longer than any history we have recorded, is moot. the issue is we are all here and we should just do our best to get along and not worry what activities that other people do piss of your god or not so much so that you want to create more and more moraly based laws.
Open your eyes people, geez.
|
|
Interesting
By:
Keyur ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:14:41 GMT |
|
No matter wat other people think about but i dont think this article is related to existance of god existance. For the people who love science and want to know the history of the earth that is basend on facts rather then opinions like flat earth this is a important discovery.
|
|
Evolution?
By:
Just a man ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:12:16 GMT |
|
Why are people commenting on evolution here? While it seems pretty obvious that grasses would have been around a long time this is not exactly breaking news. And newsflash for some of the commenters: Evolution is not "just a theory."
Evolution is an empirically verifiable fact. You can watch under a microscope as bacteria evolve before your very eyes. Only the evolution of mankind from lower life forms is a theory. Please don't comment on things you do not understand. This being said, all scientists know that darwins theory of evolution is wrong, no news there, but that does not mean that evolution does not happen. It only means it does not happen in the way one man imagined it.
Please do some fact checking before blasting into unfounded accusations as to the fallacy of theories that you do not understand.
|
|
All this noise
By:
David ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:02:20 GMT |
|
I am going to start off with a statement of the obvious, nobody KNOWS how we got here.
Second I'd like to state for those that arn't deciphering the differnce between plants and grass. Yes, I think every one knows that plants have been on land undebatidly since 460 Mya or 1.3 billion years. This would give the dinosaurs plenty of food...
This article wouldn't prove evolution right or wrong, if it were 100% fact. I'm not sure why this came up in the first place. Also, evolution wouldn't disprove the existance of God either. God could have easily created life to evolve.
Intraspecies evolution, or just plain adaptation as most people like to call it, isn't under debate. What is though is interspecies evolution. I won't say that it out right isn't true, but I don't believe in it for the simple lack of evidence. Shouldn't there be thousands of almost changed species between every one? And why are is evidence of this so hard to find? They find one species that looks like a mix between two, and call it proof. Then does the platipus proove that wombats evolved from ducks?
Also, just because you can't think or prove of a better reason, don't assume that the one that is there is automatically true. Need I remind you that is the very reason people thought our only elements were earth, wind, fire, and air for so long.
|
|
God & Dinosaurs
By:
BHB ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:42:08 GMT |
|
Its a shame that closed minded and ignorante people assume that because Darwin had some theory and dinosaurs existed millions of years ago that that means God does not exist.
God gave man a brain, it is a pitty many people never use this.
maybe people are too stupid to evolve?
and for the person who things evolution went from alge to plants ... ahh, well you can have leaf eating dino's without gress - DUH!
|
|
so dinosaurs aren't older than grass
By:
Suffra ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:05:37 GMT |
|
if dinosaurs and grass are the same age.... then dinosaurs aren't older than grass... then grass isn't older than dinosaurs... and the earth is "new"... and god exists
|
|
Sad...
By:
Jason ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:03:06 GMT |
|
Re: Subject : Evolution is FACT - deal with it!
Why is that 99% of the world does not know the difference between a scientific fact and a scientific theory.
I'd suggest that both creationists and evolutionist look up the meaning of the words before they throw them around so casually.
This will help your education get started:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact
|
|
Facts
By:
Mr Science ,
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:11:03 GMT |
|
If anyone here has done any research regarding carbon-14 dating they would understand that it is only reliable from 3000-3500 years. Anything more than that is just a guess because for carbon-14 dating to be accurate, the concentrations of carbon-14 and carbon-12 must have remained constant in the atmosphere for the life of the planet.
|
|
Yumm
By:
Grass ,
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:56:51 GMT |
|
MMMMM Grass. *Homer Simpson drool*
|
|
Dung fossils reveal the grass was green for the foodie Dinos
By:
Minu ,
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:06:03 GMT |
|
Dear Editor,
This is a good artical and needs further investigations. There are many facts lying behind this theory. This is a good artical and we hope further studies on this subject.
Thanks
|
|
Re: Edward
By:
Indole ,
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:57:37 GMT |
|
Edward, perhaps you are not aware that the monocots (the group that includes grasses) are an advanced group of plants that only evolved very recently in geological time.
|
|
about tobacco
By:
nisha ,
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:53:26 GMT |
|
tobacco is dangerous to health.
so,it should be banded
|
|
dinosaurs
By:
bonti ,
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:38:57 GMT |
|
Why even their cousin the pachderms.also savour plants and greasses?....................bonti
|
|
Evolution is FACT - deal with it!
By:
jtx ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:25:42 GMT |
|
It is common for the uneducated to say over and over that evolution is just a theory. This is an incorrect statment. Evolution is a fact of nature. Darwins theory of "natural selection" is a theory. Do not confuse the two. Close minded people tend to choose what they want to believe and then disregard anything (no matter the facts) that does not support their ideas.
|
|
I know you will not print this
By:
edward ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:59:47 GMT |
|
Ok, editor I read the dissclaimer at the end. I see that you will only PRINT what suits to prove your points. How sad.
|
|
This web site is a joke
By:
Edward ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:57:22 GMT |
|
Now that I have gone to a differnent page I have come back to this one. This web site is a joke. It is the National Enquire for the Religious Right Nut Balls. I am sure if I did around I will find some place where they are telling us that dinosaurs were here 10,000 years ago and man was hunting them. Heck I bet you will find an article from the "Evolution Musium" and can see a fossile of a mans and dinosaurs foot print. Well folks I have been to the "Evolution Museum" and the Religious nut running the place is exactly that. A nut.
|
|
not at all
By:
jukap ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:51:27 GMT |
|
more empyrical evidence that pure creationism is not the case. Go study some philosophy and geology if you still believe that a single being created everything.
|
|
Duh.
By:
Edward ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:45:29 GMT |
|
Ok this is about the stupidest article I have read in a while. To think that you could have plants and not grass is just about stupid. What did these people think plant eating dinosaurs ate? I mean for that matter did evolution skip an beat and go straigth from alge to plants? Morons..
|
|
Dinosaur Doo Doo
By:
KB ,
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:51:56 GMT |
|
Just one more proof that Evolution is JUST a THEORY!
|
|
|
|
|