Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Shriners' charitable accounting questioned

Posted : Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:23:00 GMT
By : United Press International
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
NEW YORK, March 19 A New York Times investigation published Monday claims just 2 percent of funds Shriners raised in 2005 went to operate their charitable hospitals.

In interviews with current and former members of the Masonic order, the newspaper reported more than 57 percent of the $32 million the group raised in 2005 through circuses, bingo games and raffles went to costs of the fraternity.

''Money raised for the hospitals is being used to pay for parties and liquor and trips and they know it,'' said Johnny Edwards, a former leader of Oasis Shrine in Charlotte, N.C. ''The way I see it, they are stealing from crippled children.''

In response, Michael Andrews, the executive vice president of the Imperial Council, told the Times isolated cases of fraud have been discovered and rectified.

''I think if you compare us to any other charity in America, you would find we do the best job, Andrews said. I think you need to look at the big picture here: We probably do more for children with special needs than any other entity.''

Since 1919, Shriners have built 22 hospitals that provide orthopedic and burn care to needy children.

by UPI

Copyright 2007

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Shriners' charitable accounting questioned
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 
Your Comments

Shriners Honesty
By: Honest Abe , Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:29:47 GMT

Why are people so damn stupid AND REFUSE TO BELIEVE THAT


Shriners
By: Charles E. Martin , Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:56:28 GMT

Each Shriner pays $5 per year into an endowment fund that is used to purchase securities and investments. The interest on the fund operates the hospitals. Shriners raise money through paper sales, grapefruit sales, etc. to operate the Shrine buildings/centers,etc. The fund raising is carefully audited.


Shriners are the best
By: Mike Floyd , Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:52:19 GMT

The shriners are the best, we were in big trouble when our daughter was born with a cleft pallet, no hospitals would help us because we didn't have any insurance, on our way back from the last place at childrens hospital in little rock, we stopped in at a walmart where the shriners were doing a fundraiser selling onions. we went up and ask if they could help us. they scooped us up pay all of our traveling costs a couple times a year to go to chicago shriners hospital, at have taken care of our daughters 5 surgery's since she was 3 months old, now she will be 10 this May, and she has a beautiful smile thanks to the shriners, they have always picked up every bill and every expense for us. Their doctors are very proffesional, their hospitals, very clean, lots of activities for the kids all day long, so don't let this news story drag you down. their great people,
Mike and Destiny Floyd
Mena, Arkansas


Shriners Investigation
By: Sandy Frost , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:37:54 GMT

My 14 part investigative series looking into the
Shriners finances, among other things, can be read at:
http://sandyfrost .newsvine.com.
Thank you,
Sandy Frost


Masons charity
By: Brian Terry , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:11:52 GMT

Your secret satanic society is curse to mankind,always was,always will be.Your new world order Illuminati traitors and practiceing satanic cults must go.


Your story
By: Jonathan Lewis , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:09:21 GMT

If one were to know any Mason, one would know that this is misleading. We, as good men and as Masons and Shriners invite you to find out more about our good intentions and characters by attending any public event (there are many) that we hold in order to benefit those who need assistance. Ask any Mason to explain to you what our fraternity is about, and you will understand why fraud or mis-representation is not the case.

With so many hospitals and people doing such great work for so many, it's a shame that this publication had to try to strip some beauty from it. Organzations fund themselves in many ways, including endowments and fundraisers. Does every penny the GOP or the DNC make go to campagins? Hardly. But they get the job done for those whom they serve. As do we. Masons alone contribute more than $1 Million each day from thier own pockets (as a whole) to various charities throughout the nation.

It is good and proper to advance free speech and press. It is also good to bring to light (as we would say) impropriety on the behalf of anyone choosing to do the wrong thing. Just remember that in a free society, that when you report things for the benefit of a few more readers today, then you may find that you lose many more in the future.


Great reporting...
By: Roxtar , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:44:33 GMT

Wow... eartimes.org apparently has NO integrity when it comes to news at all. And the way its written? It looks like a 3rd grader wrote it. Where's the quotes in the last paragraph where you are quoting someone? I had to read it twice to make sure 'I think...' wasn't actually the opinion of this site, and not the quote of Mr. Andrews.

Oh, and taking facts, twisting them around, and posting them? Slander much? I'd like to see what this .org site does for children under 18.

This site is just about as reputable as one of those magazines you see with 'Batboy born in Tazmania' on the cover.


statistics
By: Harley Manchester , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:40:38 GMT

Actually according to the NYTimes article about 42.8% of the funds raised in 2005 went to the
hospitals and to transporting children to the hospitals (9million and 4.7 millon respectively).


recheck your article, and the one you're referencing
By: Brian , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:35:52 GMT

The New York Times article says nothing like you are claiming. I don't know if this is an intentional slander campaign, but you'd be well-served to remove this fraudulent article.

Second: your editor needs to be fired. Try a bit of punctuation next time, perhaps?

---------
said Johnny Edwards, a former leader of Oasis Shrine in Charlotte, N.C. The way I see it, they are stealing from crippled children.In response,
---------

Where's the quote?


Not even close
By: Tom Dowsman , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:55:12 GMT

Reread the NYT article and try again...

Then check http://www.charitynavigator.org/ for the Shriners' rating.

Dumbass.


Shriners' charitable accounting questioned
By: General News Editor , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:10:35 GMT

Way to cherry pick statistics from the original report. I'm sure your due diligence could also find the Shriners having WMDs that they could launch on to your home within 10 minutes as well.


Your article is WRONG!
By: Paige Barrow , Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:08:00 GMT

From the NY Times: Only 2 percent of the Shrine hospitals’ operating income comes from money raised by Shrine temples and members’ dues. (The bulk is supplied by the hospitals’ $9 billion endowment.)

This is different than your claim that just 2 percent of funds Shriners raised in 2005 went to operate their charitable hospitals.

I don't disagree that there is a problem with the Shriner's accounting practices, but your article is misquoting the original investigation and skewing the story in order to gain readership. True journalism reports the FACTS and not misinterpretations of said facts. Are there no editors at earthtimes.org?

Get your story straight!!



More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 
 
In Shriner Spending, a Blurry Line of Giving

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.