Hollywood : Sins sell so much so that they border on unrealism

A group of medical researchers from University of Sydney's School of Public Health have published a study that suggests that Hollywood movies fall short of showing the real but negative consequences of risky sex and drug use.
Posted : Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:02:00 GMT
Author : Chris Leeming
Category : Entertainment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Entertainment News | Home
A group of medical researchers from University of Sydney's School of Public Health have published a study that suggests that Hollywood movies fall short of showing the “real” but negative consequences of risky sex and drug use.

Lead by Dr. Hasantha Gunasekera, the researchers studied 87 of the biggest hits produced by Hollywood at the box-office, through 22 years starting from 1983, only to find lot of sex but only one if any reference to condoms. The films also failed to depict unwanted pregnancies or even any reference of sexually transmitted diseases. Worst of all their portrayals of drug-use were bereft of any "negative consequences".

While all these films evaluated were amongst the top-grossers of each year in the two decades, it is clear that while the “risky scenes” may have helped in their success, the moviemakers may have failed in their responsibility to the public of accurate portrayals. Dr. Gunasekera who used a September 2003 published list of 200 most successful films of all time for the study, suggested that the “social norm” being presented was concerning, even as “HIV and illicit drug pandemics” have become worrisome for countries worldwide.

While the researchers excluded G or PG rated animated films and those pictures released before the 1983 start of the AIDS crisis, they were left 87 films to watch very closely for their study and classification. Of these, 28 had graphic depictions of sex while 53 in all had some sex scene in them. Barring Pretty Woman, the 1990 romance between a prostitute (Julia Roberts) and a rich businessman (Richard Gere), none of the movies contained any reference to "condom use”. Moreover with no depictions of the negative repercussions of unprotected sex like unwanted pregnancies, HIV or STDs, it appeared that the movie industry could be fuel wrong notions amongst youngsters and uneducated.

American Pie 2, a 2001 film of the comedy genre, was found to be richest with the most sex scenes with seven of unprotected sex, where the worst consequence was “social embarrassment". Basic Instinct, a 1992 film of the thriller genre fared second with six scenes of sex, offering neither any negative consequences nor any suggestion of birth control, besides the consequence of "death by ice pick". James Bond movies were equally labeled inappropriate for promiscuity and visual depictions of sex including three in the 2002 adventure Die Another Day. None of his charmed women portrayed any concern on "new partners, condoms, birth control” or any other consequences of Bond's sexual appetite. If sex sells at the box-office, the need to show drug use is unexplainable and yet numerous of the films did exactly that. Strangely while 8 per cent of the studied 87 films contained portrayals of marijuana use, over half of the scenes depicted drug use in positive light, with the balance tending to be neutral offering no negative consequences.

While Dr. Gunasekera felt the "convincing evidence” of entertainment media influencing public behaviour, the authors concluded, "The motion picture industry should be encouraged to depict safer sex practices and the real consequences of unprotected sex and illicit drug use". The researchers views were not corroborated by film fraternity and magazine writers like Adam Smith, who said, "Hollywood doesn't depict anything with any of its consequences…. Its job isn't to be a social and moral guardian… It's fiction".

Even if that is true, Hollywood must realize its huge influence on a wide-spectrum of people across the world and if it cannot portray fiction correctly, it is better to not portray at all. But the argument will always arise that people go to movies to be entertained and not carry their real-life burdens to the theatres, but what happens when real life apes the reel life, is a question that no one would like to answer.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Hollywood : Sins sell so much so that they border on unrealism
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

Mariah's comment
By: Narhan , Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:01:18 GMT

"Candy" does not glorify heroin use, in fact, quite the opposite. It shows the consequences of addiction, and the way it affects the users and those around them (including their unborn child). The whole film follows the descent of two addicts as heroin gradually destroys their lives. This was a very powerful film, very heartbreaking, and the performances by Abbie Cornish, Heath Ledger, and the rest of the cast were top notch.
You need to see this film because it backs up everything that you said. For that reason your response is almost comical. My guess is that you were not paying close attention to what Barberie was saying, as the film takes place in Australia, not Hollywood. She was probably praising the talents of those involved in bringing this sobering tale to the screen, not for being cool, glamorous heroin addicts. This is one of the best films I have seen in some time, I can't recommend it highly enough.


drugs in hollywood
By: Mariah , Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:30:03 GMT

I was watching That's So Hollywood tonight and I was enjoying it. Up until the point that Jilliane Barberie plugged a movie called Candy. The movie was about two heroine addicts that fall in love in Hollywood. She was talking about a rising star in Hollywood and made the movie and the girl and Heath Ledger out to be so cool. And they were totally not. Maybe what people should know is that drugs lead to insanity and death. Drugs take innocent people to terrible places like mental instituitions. I'm angry at Jillianne Barberie because she is on the morning show and people think she is really cool. And she is. I think she needs to make better decisions about what she plugs on T.V. and how she goes about doing it. Movies like The Holiday, they are great. They are geared toward making a person feel good and that is what I like. When you leave the movie you want to go home and sit by the fire or perhaps go shopping with your friends for Christmas. Movies are inspiring. A movie like Candy can inspire someone to go out and buy heroine, shoot it in their arm and have sex "like they do in the movies". I totally don't agree with this type of movie and I am all about feeling good. So, I agree with your article and I think people in Hollywood should be careful of situations like the one I just saw on "That's So Hollywood". People are impressionable and not everyone is lucky to have gotten a great education. I think Hollywood should consider "selling" education to their audiences and make this world a better place. Drugs don't do it and they are just terrible I can't say more than that, they are just terrible. Oh and definitely use a condom. No one wants a STD or AIDS!



More Entertainment News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases
 
School of Public Health - The University of Sydney
Yahoo! Movies
Hollywood.com
Movies.com


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.