U.S. General says comments on homosexuality his personal opinion
|
|
|
| Posted
:
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:20:01 GMT |
| Author
:
Martin Booth |
| Category
:
US (World) |
| News
Alerts by Email ( click
here ) |
|
|
|
US World News |
Home
|
|
|
WASHINGTON: Gen Peter Pace, the top-ranking U.S. military officer, whose controversial remarks that homosexuality amounted to an immoral act led to angry reactions from various sections of the society, attempted to pacify the critics saying the remarks were his personal opinion.
Gen Pace, who is chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday he should have focused more on his support of the policy and less on his personal moral views.
Pace had told the Chicago Tribune during an interview that the military should not condone immoral acts such as homosexual relations. He said he believed homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and immoral acts should not be condoned.
The remarks brought forth criticism from diverse sections of people, including gay activists and politicians.
Pace later said in a statement he made a mistake by devoting so much time to his personal views. He said, "In expressing my support for the current policy, I also offered some personal opinions about moral conduct. I should have focused more on my support of the policy and less on my personal moral views."
During the interview, Pace outlined his support for the Pentagon's policy of 'don't ask, don't tell' on gays serving in the military, which had became law in 1993 under president Bill Clinton. The law allowed gays and lesbians to be in the army as long as they keep their sexual preferences private and do not engage in homosexual acts. Pace said he supported the policy, which he claimed opposed homosexual acts.
Pace's problems seemed to be not over. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, when asked to comment on the controversy said personal opinion was not relevant. He said what is important is that "we have a law, a statute that governs 'don't ask, don't tell.' that's the policy of this department."
John Warner, a senior Virginia Republican, who had chaired the Senate armed services committee, said he disagreed with Pace's view that homosexuality is immoral.
House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi said she was disappointed in the moral judgment made by Pace and the military should consider changing its policy on allowing gays to serve on its ranks.
The Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights organization, described the remarks as bigoted. They are irresponsible, offensive and a slap in the face to the gay men and women who are currently serving their country with honor and bravery, the group's president Joe Solmonese said.
Copyright,
respective author or news agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
hypocrite
By:
nofragarmy ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:05:35 GMT |
|
Go Pace go, keep up the pace, slow but steady. Good riddance to these army joining peeping toms. To the detractors I say freedom of speech, you know its sort of lik the freedom to fornicate.
|
|
Bigotry in any form is WRONG
By:
James Smith ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:36:44 GMT |
|
General Pace has been praised by some for expressing his personal opinion, and many others have even quoted from the Bible in an attempt to justify his particular brand of deep-seated hatred. In either case, bigotry and hatred are WRONG and Pace should have kept his moral judgment against a section of the American population to himself. We as Americans may not be able to totally stamp out hatred in all its insidious forms, but we can speak out against it when it is so blatant.
|
|
freedom of speech
By:
Mr X ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:30:34 GMT |
|
stand behind wat you said general. many americans died so you could have your freedom of speech.
|
|
Support the CJCS
By:
Jeff ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:28:29 GMT |
|
GEN Pace is correct. The primary job of the Chairman is to advise the president and senior administration officials -- in other words to give his opinion on matters of national defense. Not only is he right that homosexuality is immoral (as is adultery, as he said) he was right to say it.
|
|
Pace
By:
Jen4 ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:24:57 GMT |
|
Pace has a right to his express his opinion and I have a right to expressly disagree. Homophobia is a moral failing.
Homosexuality can be used to moral or amoral ends, just like heterosexuality.
Homosexuals and heterosexuals who treat themselves and others with dignity and love in relationships are acting morally.
Homosexuals and heterosexuals who objectify themselves and others and treat themselves and others poorly are acting immorally or perhaps amorally.
That is my opinion.
I really am not interested in asking WWJD in this situation, I hope that people have enough of a conscience to know right from wrong without having to ask what Jesus would do. And the answer of WWJD changes depending on the person asking WWJD.
But if we must consider WWJD, I think Jesus would give an answer much like the one I gave above, because it is based on the golden rule.
I also think Jesus would examine the past 2,000 years of history and scientific advancement and understand that homosexuality is a normal variant of human behavior and He would try to update Scripture so that those who rely solely upon Scripture for their moral instruction could be a little bit better informed.
|
|
HELLO
By:
Ashley ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:05:29 GMT |
|
What does anybody know? What if it was the other way around what if straigt people was fighting for thiers rights. What are going back to the civil war? One of you said that it was because they flaut it. Wrong. I know that you have told some of your buddys, bragging that you had a hot date with some chic but you never ever here a gay guy or girl say that. Homophobia is the top phobia there is in this country. I have a challenge for you all. Look up homosexual and the history. Then e-mail me with you have found.
|
|
Gays in the military
By:
Moral Majority ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:01:40 GMT |
|
I think it is ridiculous that General Pace should have to resign his statement on Gays in the military. What would Jesus Do. He would forgive the Gays and there immoral behavior and save them from eternal hell and damnation if they would stop there behavior and repent of there sins. General Pace is being forced to deny his moral and religious upbringing to pacify the sinner, which is in direct conflict of what God tells us to do. In short, there is a conflict of moral interest and General Pace is on the correct side. I think he should be given a metal for entirety in service to our country.
|
|
General Pace, Right On
By:
Tom Gaige ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:55:58 GMT |
|
It is about time the top brass has spoken. We think that the topic of gays is somehow over, think again.
We have lost focus on this topic. We call it a protected right. When in fact it is about people making bad choices and forcing it on all the rest.
What flowed out of the General's mouth is what is on his heart. Scripture calls it sin. God hates it. The General chosen right. thank you
|
|
Right
By:
ashley ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:53:43 GMT |
|
U.S. Genral has the responsebilty to keep his words that may cause others distress to himself. Feb 2005 he said after Lt. Gen Mattis stated that it was fun shooting people
|
|
US General comments on Homosexuals
By:
Mark Smith ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:50:14 GMT |
|
What do you know? A man with courage to speak his convictions. He has my backing.
|
|
Freedom of Speech
By:
E C ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:48:15 GMT |
|
There are a lot of people in this country that believe homosexuality is immoral and that side has been pretty much silenced. The two fastest growing religions in the world speak out against it and the most oppressed enslaved minority this country has seen overwhelming has a phobia of it. I'm not saying that it is right or wrong, but I'm saying that if that's not grounds to express a belief then there is something wrong with our view of an individuals right to speak.
America, you'll continue to hear sides speaking out of frustration (some extreme) because you haven't allowed people to talk.
|
|
personal views
By:
curtis ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:46:12 GMT |
|
It seems to me that condoning personal dislike and projecting a public officials personal views is harmful and can incite violence towards a group that already has problems just surviving in a society where straight people already have things mapped out for a normal life.I dont think adding fuel to the fire is a productive agenda.
Thank you.Saying you are not condoning is just a way to rally supporters your personal cause politically,this is very obvious.
|
|
Pace's comments
By:
Gemini Conner ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:43:42 GMT |
|
I knew when hearing U. S. General Pace's comments that he would be crucified by the liberal media & gay supporting groups in our nation. I totally support our General and it is about time someone takes a proper stand against the immorality of homosexuality. May God bless him!
|
|
Good for him
By:
MG Branham ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:38:31 GMT |
|
God forbid any public official take a moral stand! I served 14 years in U.S. Army Special Forces and Iraq. I think I have earned the right along with anyone else to give my opinion. The only reason the military has that rule is because they don't want soldiers disagreeing publicly with their policies. Is this Communist North Korea or America. Good for you General Pace! I personally don't care who you have sex with....keep it to yourself and no one will even know. The reason it is a problem in the first place is because people are flaunting it instead of keeping their private business at home. I don't go around telling people I am straight. Who cares? But it is every Americans right to speak their mind,General Pace said his and the PC's in Washington just didn't like it.
|
|
The right to express personal opinions
By:
Jeffrey McAnarney ,
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:06:32 GMT |
|
General Pace is wrong to express his personal opinions in the manner in which he did. Service members are barred by the Uniformed Code of Military Justice from expressing their opinion when doing so would give the impression that they are speaking for their branch of service.
This includes attending political rallies in uniform and certainly includes giving an interview as the Chairman of the JCS. He could and should be reprimanded under the regulations.
|
|
|
|
|