The Earthtimes online News
Home


The Great Global Warming Swindle: Is it?

A documentary titled The Great Global Warming Swindle will be aired on British television by Channel 4 Thursday highlighting that claims global warming is manmade constitutes the ''biggest scam of modern times.''
Posted : Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:39:00 GMT
Author : Renin Paul
Category : Environment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Create your own RSS
Environment News | Home
LONDON: A documentary titled The Great Global Warming Swindle will be aired on British television by Channel 4 Thursday highlighting that claims global warming is manmade constitutes the ''biggest scam of modern times.''

The documentary dismisses outright the claims that greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activity leads to climate change. Instead, it says the Sun is the real cause for global warming.

Directed by film maker Martin Durkin, the documentary disputes the scientific opinion professed in the recent United Nations report, which has said humans are very likely to blame for global warming and that there is no doubt remaining that it is caused by man's use of fossil fuels.

Durkin says the argument of man-made climate change is a lie and the biggest scam of modern times. He describes global warming as "a multibillion-dollar worldwide industry, created by fanatically anti-industrial environmentalists, supported by scientists peddling scare stories to chase funding, and propped up by compliant politicians and the media."

Durkin also says with the argument that global warming is man-made getting predominance, several other reasons for climate change are getting sidelined.

The film lines up leading scientists who claim that there is little scientific evidence to support the theory that global warming is a result of man-made greenhouse emissions. They argue global warming could be caused by increased solar activity such as a massive eruption.

Prof Ian Clark, an expert in palaeoclimatology from the University of Ottawa, insists that global warming could be caused by increased activity on the Sun and that ice-core samples from Antarctica show that warmer periods in Earth's history have come about 800 years before rises in carbon dioxide levels.

These argument is, however, counter to the work of several scientists, who have used similar ice-core samples to illustrate that raised levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have accompanied the various global warming periods.

The documentary also tells how after the Second World War there was a huge increase in carbon dioxide, but temperatures have subsided for four decades after 1940.

Philip Stott, emeritus professor of biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, says climate change is a complicated issue. He says it cannot be said that just one factor can lead to the greenhouse effect.

Another scientist appearing in the documentary is Paul Reiter of Paris' Pasteur Institute. He is an expert in malaria and described the U.N. report a "sham." He says, it included the names of several scientists, including him, who disagreed with the report.

Reiter says his name was removed only after he threatened legal action against the panel.

Copyright, respective author or news agency



Article : The Great Global Warming Swindle: Is it?
Print this article
Email this article


Share on

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

Holocaust Deniers
By: John , Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:59:19 GMT

For Stevie

"One of the comments of some of the scientists was that to deny Global Warming is seen as being akin to denying the holocaust by the proponents of Global Warming. I didn't really believe it. "

Whether you believe it or not it is true. The comment was made by Ellen Goodman of the Boston Globe on Feb. 9, 2007.
"Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers..."
The original article can be found at:
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/02/09/no_change_in_political_climate/




Eyes/ears closed - judgements made.
By: Stevie , Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:25:16 GMT

I watched the Inconvenient Truth on Tuesday and the 'Swindle' on Thursday. I was prepared to find fault all the way through with Thursday's programme instead I found it very thought provoking and the cv's of the scientists were very impressive. At the end having viewed the two presentations I felt there clearly needs further extensive investigation on both sides of the argument. I rang a friend to discuss the merits of both sides and was amazed when she got really, really angry and said how disgusted she was that 'Swindle' had been aired. Further questionning (although it was difficult to get a word in as she was so angry), provided the information that 'no' she had not watched 'Swindle', but was just furious that anything so 'irresponsible' could have been put on a national TV station. One of the comments of some of the scientists was that to deny Global Warming is seen as being akin to denying the holocaust by the proponents of Global Warming. I didn't really believe it. However, I now believe that to say how impressive the programme was must be a potential route to verbal/physical abuse. Being a coward I think I'll keep the secret of the Swindle to myself but go on a Gap to Africa to get the full benefit of solar power!!


800 year lag.
By: eve odds , Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:07:45 GMT

I think the 800 year lag is the most important point to remember.
So, after watching the program, i understand the facts as:

1/The sun enters an active phase, emitting more particles than usual.
2/These particles push cosmic rays away from the solar system ... bearing in mind cosmic rays act on particles of dust in our atmostphere which in turn capture water moisture and create clouds.
3/As we have less clouds the ground temperature rises (although as stated on the channel 4 program, the upper atmosphere temperature has remained constant).
4/ As the ground temperature rises, more plant life flourishes, the oceans get warmer,etc.
5/ After 800 years these extra emissions of c02
peak ... so how do the global warming activists
explain the temperature falling again just as the
co2 has peaked!!!

The channel 4 program mentioned al gores presentation on global warming ... and how the co2 vs temperature graphs have been mis-aligned by 800 years so they match perfectly ... does he earn money from his presentations??
Is he one of the thousands you will stop earning money if this global warming idea gets busted??
How many journalists stand to loose money/jobs.
How many scientists stand to looase money/jobs.

For me the channel 4 program wasn't two or three facts bulked up to last 90 minutes ... it was a wel presented, well researched piece with so many facts it needs two or three viewings to catch them all.

I have seen several people commenting on another forum about this program at the exact same time the program was on ... keyboard warriers who form their opinions with eyes closed i think!!

eve odds
uk


global warming
By: stephanie , Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:08:10 GMT

i think the cars should run by electricity and not petrol.


YOU SAID IT
By: Ryan Hofmann , Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:10 GMT

This article perfectly expresses my opinion.


Not 'might/could'
By: Rob , Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:46:22 GMT

"They only hold out the possibility that CO2 might/could have acted as an amplifying agent later on."

"might/could" is too weak. "Did" is better. Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere increases the greenhouse effect. This much has not been in serious dispute at any point in the last 100 years.


CO2 'Accompanied' Global Warming Periods?
By: Steven Douglas , Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:50:43 GMT

"These argument is, however, counter to the work of several scientists, who have used similar ice-core samples to illustrate that raised levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have accompanied the various global warming periods."

Sure, in much the same way ancient Japanese women "accompanied" their husbands -- they always lagged way behind. The word "accompanied" is the intentionally misleading operative word here.

CO2 has alway lagged temperature increases - BY 800 YEARS! This is not counter to the work either, since even the Believers at RealClimate.org state on their site that CO2 "could not have caused the first 800 years of warming" after an intergalatial termination. They only hold out the possibility that CO2 might/could have acted as an amplifying agent later on.





More Environment News click here

Choose Theme
Green Earth Blue Earth Orange Earth Purple Earth

Search
 
You can
Print this articleemail this articleComment on this article

Current News

News Category
Business
Entertainment
Environment
- Nature
- Energy
General
Health
Sports
Technology
World
Press Release
Related Links
- The Great Global Warming Swindle

About us | News Archives | Browse old Archive | Feedback | Disclaimer | Mobile/PDA | News Alerts

The views expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of earthtimes.org and we accept no responsibility for the views or opinions
expressed in the articles either direct or indirect.

© 2008 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy