IBM out, Intel in: Apple; single-chip Macs being phased out

Posted : Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:32:00 GMT
By : Zipporah Koganowich
Category : Technology
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Technology News | Home
CALIFORNIA: Apple has removed the 1.8GHz, single processor Power Mac G5 from its online store. Yesterday the company confirmed that single-chip processor systems were being taken off as the company plans an entire lineup of systems featuring dual-chip processors.

The production of the single-chip Power Mac G5 is discontinued and the last of the systems would be sold through other channels. As part of the effort, the Power Mac G5 line was upgraded two months ago, by adding dual-processor systems ranging from 2 GHz to 2.7 GHz in clock speed.

The next batch of the Power Mac G5 line would be all dual processor and “deliver the ultimate in performance for our most advanced customers” the company said in a statement to the media.

Apple made a more significant move by announcing earlier this month its decision to part ways with IBM and team up with Intel. IBM’s PowerPC chips would be replaced with Intel chips in all of Apple products, a move that has greatly surprised the market. This transition would take 12 to 18 months.

Until now Intel chips were seen as suitable only for Windows-based PCs. Apple systems have been using the IBM PowerPC chip for almost a decade. Software manufacturers had to convert or “port” their applications to either PowerPC platforms or Intel processor; or to both because the hardware architecture of the two platforms was different from each other.

With Intel and Apple shaking hands, one can look forward to running Windows on a Mac. It can get even better with dual processor platforms as one could then run Windows on one hard drive and OS X in the other.

Apple enjoys a two percent share of the worldwide PC market. When asked for the reason for cutting business ties with IBM, the spokesman said there were certain supply issues which IBM could not resolve, referring to their order for a notebook version of the G5 processor that would not overheat. IBM appeared to have been slow in executing this order. However, sources at IBM said they did not do so because Apple did not accept their terms for the deal.

Market-watchers and analysts feel AMD would have been a better choice for Apple rather than Intel. They point out that AMD’s proactive methods matched Apple’s flair for innovative software. AMD is seen as the more dynamic of the two chip-making companies. Its breakthroughs in 64-bit computing and dual core processor core chips that have received positive reviews should have weighed in their favor for the choice.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : IBM out, Intel in: Apple; single-chip Macs being phased out
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

mac goes for Intel
By: hark , Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:00:53 GMT

This is probably the result of Motorola's delay to
deliver the mc68000 chip at the time IBM was about to select for its IBM-PC. Intel and B. Gates with MSDOS were selected, while ar more mature and better
solutions were available, or "on the horizon".
It is sad to see that marked-forces neglect engineering efforts to make a "good" product, and instead go for a fast solution for their hyperware.
Free enterprize has its drawbacks..



More Technology News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.