The price of Jackson’s freedom
|
|
|
| Posted
:
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:46:01 GMT |
| By
:
Sunil Vyas |
| Category
:
Entertainment |
| News Alerts by
Email ( click
here ) |
|
Entertainment News |
Home
|
|
|
|
California: The child-abuse trial has left Michael Jackson a changed man. According to defense lawyer Thomas Mesereau, the pop star will never again share his bed with children as it makes him vulnerable to false charges.
Jackson himself did not speak to the media the morning after the acquittal. He had emerged the courtroom looking very frail and pale. It is believed he left immediately for his Neverland ranch as the stress of the over-four-month-long trial had made him very weak. His father Joe Jackson said Jackson went to bed soon after reaching Neverland.
Lawyer Mesereau said in an interview that he was convinced of Jackson’s innocence. But the man, because of his nature, would remain an easy prey for people who wanted to extract money or promote their careers. He said he never doubted that the court would find Jackson ‘not guilty’ and considered the prosecution’s case ridiculous. The prosecution had accused him on ten counts: four counts of molestation, one count of attempted molestation, one count of conspiracy and four counts of supplying alcohol to a minor.
In the meanwhile, three of the 12-member jury spoke to the media and are reported to have said that Michael Jackson may have molested boys but not necessarily the 13-year old accuser. Eleanor Cook 79, jury member, said "We had our suspicions, but we couldn't judge on that because it wasn't what we were there to do.”
When asked how the Jackson reacted to the news of his acquittal, Mesereau said the pop star thanked him and his entire team. He also thanked his family and said he was thankful to God as well and wanted to pray “for giving him the guidance and strength to move forward through this."
Mesereau also said he could understand the public’s willingness to believe all the unfounded accusations against Jackson, because he believed that the pop star was “unquestionably one of the finest human beings I've ever been privileged to know" he said. He also said that Jackson was an easy person to work with and very generous and caring about everyone in his life. “All that will have to change now,” Mesereau said, “because he has been generous to people who didn’t deserve it.”
As he left the courtroom yesterday hundreds of fans who waited outside the court were overcome with joy at the verdict. Fans even raised posters glorifying Jackson’s lawyer Mesereau as “Mr. Incredible” for his victory. Many legal experts argue that the celebrity lawyer would not have won the case had Prosecutor Tom Sneddon not decided to hinge the case on the testimony of the accuser’s mother. Mesereau had hired a private detective to dig into the background of the woman.
The private investigator had produced evidence and witnesses against the woman. Mesereau disproved her accusation that Jackson conspired to kidnap the mother and son and hold them captive at Neverland, by establishing that she had left the ranch to get her legs waxed at precisely the time that she claimed to be held there. The defense also proved that she had lied in a previous suit against J. C. Penney Co. and was a welfare cheat. Bringing in the boy’s mother who had a history of welfare fraud had undermined the case giving Mesereau the big advantage he looked for.
The pop star’s website went overboard with the acquittal and ranked the court verdict alongside the birth of Martin Luther King, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the release of Nelson Mandela.
This high-profile case is believed to have cost the supposedly ‘on-the-brink-of-bankruptcy’ pop star a whopping $ 5m as fees for Mesereau defense team. The celebrity lawyer himself is said to command fees of over $500 per hour.
Copyright,
respective author or news agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
A clue for the clueless
By:
Aaron ,
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 07:03:48 GMT
|
|
Com'on people, that district attorney has been on a fishing expidition for 10 years trying to nail Michael Jackson. Of the tens of thousands of kids that go to Neveland each year, the BEST he could do was to find a family with a history of making false allegations and filing frivilous law suits.
I am an American and I am ashamed how many people have allowed their minds to become jello that is so easly molded by the news and talks show media. Many people lack the ability to reason properly.
Lastly, its a shame so many Americans can do nothing but criticize our justice system. Maybe they should move to someplace like Cuba, China, the Middle East - or even some European countries where innocence is not presumed.
Aaron
|
|
Michael Jackson
By:
Tami L. Cook ,
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:40 GMT
|
|
Whatever he does, I hope he still lets us come to NL even for the day, I don't want to hurt anyone, I just want Michael to know how much I REALLY love him, and I want to rid the carousel outside, and see the lightup Tinker Bell sign. I hope that's not too much to ask.
|
|
MJ
By:
Kash ,
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:25:31 GMT
|
|
I followed the trial every day (through the internet), read the pages of information and statements on smoking gun and never once hesitated at the thought that Michael was anything other than not guilty. There were so many holes, so many lies told for anyone without any knowledge of legal jargon to see for themselves. From day one, it was obvious this trial was about extortion. I can only thank the Jury for not being fooled by the 'evidence' and seeing this case for what it truly was. It is time now to leave him be, the public must accept the verdict and let him move on. Allow him to continue contributing to people's lives through his music and continue reaching children with his kindness. Michael shouldn't have to change, shouldn't have to re-think his lifestyle,after all, he has been found not guilty and there are many people that have testified to that fact. If he is somebody that is on a level with children, can provide them with entertainment and love in a twisted world, then I say 'what a great person he is'.
|
|
oh america, leave MJ alone
By:
suziewong ,
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:35:11 GMT
|
|
what a bitter and twisted country you are. the verdict is in, the man is innocent. are the alvizo family going to be prosecuted for purgery then? anyone who lies in a court of law including ex employees, should be also prosecuted, for waisting court time and lying. and the rest of you americans, should accept and move on. is this why you are losing good men daily in the army in iraq, cos just like your misguided politicians, your nation has to be seen as right!!
what an insecure nation you are.
God bless Micheal, no one kind and loving, weather wealthy or not, should have to endure what you just did. give it up all, because the trial is over, trial by media now is just a bore. no headline can move us, we heard them all, whacko etc... yawn!! if any of you had any brains, you would realise that child molestation or abuse cases are treated with dignity and concern for the child, however, in this case, no care or consideration was given to this child by its own family. oh no, such was the indignation and the so called concern, that the family reached for the nearest tabloid and police chief. shame on you mrs alvizo if you truly believed your child needed help, because he never got it from you. does he even get help now for belonging to a family of crazed liers and gold diggers?
Micheal Jackson, god bless you sir. and on behalf of all the nasty, greedy minded people out thier, i apologise to you on behalf of many of the human race, who can still count themselves as fair and just.
|
|
Micheal Jackson
By:
Sylvia Chunn ,
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:39:50 GMT
|
|
The entire case was built on tring to bring down a star. Only because MJ. was nice and kind to a little child liar, with a sick mother to back up a lot of made up lies, or she encouraged her kids to lie hoping they would get a big pay day. I am glad that Micheal Jackson is innocent. He should
have taken the time to take the other little liar to court back in 1993. But that's ok righteousness will always prevail. Thank God for that.We love you Micheal truely.
|
|
innocent
By:
sue ,
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 06:32:22 GMT
|
|
the pop star michael is so innocent he deserves to have his freedom like everyone else by the media and the court cases always there i dont think this is going to happen but he stayed strong and should them whose right go jackson, i think that he didnt harm any children just wanted them to be happy and enjoy their life while there young and by him giving them a that and letting them in his home doesnt make him a porno so get it his innocent and evryone get over it you all scumbags just want his money his too good for you all so just leave alone his human like evryone else and so he is a legend
"MICHAEL JACKSON"
|
|
Jackson not guilty
By:
christopher in Ptown ,
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:05:46 GMT
|
|
Whenever I see Brad Pitt, I think- handsome. Tonight, as the sun gently set I thought- graceful. From now on, when I see "The King of Pop", I'll think- pedophile.
|
|
From NZ
By:
Margaret ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:53:51 GMT
|
|
The Case tried and over.The public will only ever be given evidence the News Media want us to see another form of Propagander.(sorry for the spelling)Give the Jury Credit, for in this trial, saw and heard evidence that the rest of us in all parts of the world and even USA will not and wont get to hear as I said only what the POWERS THAT BE want us to read and believe.
|
|
Jackson's spending habits
By:
AmAr ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:31:46 GMT
|
|
Not to stray away from the topic but... MJ has a rather crazy spending problem..... he had NEW SUITS MADE FOR HIS EVERY COURT APPEARANCE .... I mean, come on... apparently, news reports say that he is supposedly endured awesome amounts of debt and still, he spends so much money... apart from the fact that maintaining Neverland should cost him a HUGE amount.
|
|
Money Money Money!
By:
Gregory ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:30:43 GMT
|
|
With so much money at stake who can know what is true? You can't convict a person just because thier money gives them a life that we can't relate to and will attract those who want a piece of it.
People lie, cheat, and murder for profit. This fact gives me resonable-doubt in this case and the past allegations.
|
|
MJ
By:
harsha ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:07:14 GMT
|
|
hey guys!...anything said and done, one thing is for sure...that MICHAEL JACKSON IS INNOCENT!....people who dont agree with this are just MAD!..jus leave them...MJ WAS...IS...and WILL BE THE "KING OF POP"...no matter what, i WILL NOT stop "WORSHIPPIN!" him...
|
|
Michael Jackson
By:
Larry Carmichael ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:50:49 GMT
|
|
Wheather Michael Jackson is guilty or not, we will never truly know, the jury says he isn't. Michael Jackson and God know. One day we all have to stand before our creator and account for what we have done while we are here on this earth. The same is true for Michael Jackson. I would suggest to him and all that read this. Get the book called
YOUR BEST LIFE NOW - By Joel Osteen.
|
|
Not surprised by the verdict ...
By:
Kerry Allen ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:39:12 GMT
|
|
But let's face it ... The so-called King of Pop certainly comes across *totally* whacked with very little connection to any sort of actual reality. It's totally freaky to not just this writer.
Dude, if you settled out of court years ago for alleged child molestation with Jordie Chandler, did you not think THEN that you should "never again share your bed with children?" I mean DUH!!!
You dodged a(nother) bullet Michael Jackson, and your former accuser is scarred for life, if not by your alleged (now acquitted) child abuse, then most certainly by the insanely painful ordeal you both have just passed through. So as that kid sums up the whole of the parts and attempts to deal with the aftermath, YOU get to return to Neverland for a nap and maybe pop a few prescription pain-killers.
So what's next? A new release of music followed by a mega-million sold out tour?
Ahhhhhhh... life is easy for the rich and famous, eh? Even if they believe themselves to be naive enough -- at age 46???? -- to become a victim of a 13 (now 15) year old boy. I suggest rehab before you hit the road as you ain't looking so good and a LOT of us don't believe you are innocent.
Kerry Allen (NYC)
|
|
Dear Sunny
By:
Patrick ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:19:25 GMT
|
|
From your comments you obviously did not fully read my letter. I state that the jury did not have hard evidence i.e. (video) to go by, but it is my contention that the video shown on t.v. where Jackson admits to enjoying the company of small children (mostly boys) and sleeping with them is in itself enough for me to believe that he is delusional that this behavior is O.K.. You, like many other of his fans go on and on as if you know him personally. Please tell me the last time you, Sunny, ate dinner at Jackson's house, spent time with Jackson after one of his concerts, or when Sunny was the last time you spoke with Jackson on the phone to support him during his trial. I can understand your support of what seems to be an idol to many, but your fervent lashing out over comments of mine that you misread reminds me that the root word of fanatic is "fan". I could really care less about Jackson and his fate now that it's over but you and your ilk seem to be caught up in a delusion that Jackson is even aware of your existence. Not that you have to, but unless you can come up with some proof that you know Jackson as well as you seem to let's remember that whole communities believed in such people as John Wayne Gacey, Jeffery Dalmer and the man that I can only remember as BTK. This may be quite extreme but you never really know someone unless you are that person. Even the families of these and other modern day monsters knew nothing of their perversions, how is it that you speak with such knowledge of the lack of Jackson's. Also, just to remind you Sunny, the jury found Jackson "Not Guilty", they did not find him innocent. Contrary to what you would like to believe there is a great difference. The follow up with some of the jurist showed that they felt something was not right with what happened between Jackson and the (then) boy but the procecution did not (and could not) produce the tangible evidence that would by now have Jackson behind bars. Again, Sunny, believe what you wish. That is the beauty of living in a country like mine, that there is real democracy and even though I and many others believe that Jackson is guilty the evidence allows him to walk free. I don't know where you are from Sunny but when you slight a whole country with a comment like "thank god I don't live in a country like America" it is obvious that your ability to make judgements comes from t.v., hearsay and whatever passes in your life as a original idea.
|
|
Dear Sunny
By:
Patrick ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:12:42 GMT
|
|
From your comments you obviously did not fully read my letter. I state that the jury did not have hard evidence i.e. (video) to go by, but it is my contention that the video shown on t.v. where Jackson admits to enjoying the company of small children (mostly boys) and sleeping with them is in itself enough for me to believe that he is delusional that this behavior is O.K.. You, like many other of his fans go on and on as if you know him personally. Please tell me the last time you, Sunny, ate dinner at Jackson's house, spent time with Jackson after one of his concerts, or when Sunny was the last time you spoke with Jackson on the phone to support him during his trial. I can understand your support of what seems to be an idol to many, but your fervent lashing out over comments of mine that you misread reminds me that the root word of fanatic is "fan". I could really care less about Jackson and his fate now that it's over but you and your ilk seem to be caught up in a delusion that Jackson is even aware of your existence. Not that you have to, but unless you can come up with some proof that you know Jackson as well as you seem to let's remember that whole communities believed in such people as John Wayne Gacey, Jeffery Dalmer and the man that I can only remember as BTK. This may be quite extreme but you never really know someone unless you are that person. Even the families of these and other modern day monsters knew nothing of their perversions, how is it that you speak with such knowledge of the lack of Jackson's. Also, just to remind you Sunny, the jury found Jackson "Not Guilty", they did not find him innocent. Contrary to what you would like to believe there is a great difference. The follow up with some of the jurist showed that they felt something was not right with what happened between Jackson and the (then) boy but the procecution did not (and could not) produce the tangible evidence that would by now have Jackson behind bars. Again, Sunny, believe what you wish. That is the beauty of living in a country like mine, that there is real democracy and even though I and many others believe that Jackson is guilty the evidence allows him to walk free. I don't know where you are from Sunny but when you slight a whole country with a comment like "thank god I don't live in a country like America" it is obvious that your ability to make judgements comes from t.v., hearsay and whatever passes in your life as a original idea.
|
|
Innocent
By:
Derek ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:56:22 GMT
|
|
I worked for five years at Neverland and those ex-employees who testified against Jackson were serial liars and some of them even drug addicted felons. Michael was always too generous. Greed motivated every one of the people who testified against Michael. Sure, he has paid people to go away -- many of the famous people I have worked for have done that rather than go through a long protracted legal fight. Gavin's mother didn't seek help for her supposedly molested son. She sought the advice of a litigator. If my son was molested I would take him to the police or a psychologist first.
|
|
when money walks....
By:
shawn ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:44:24 GMT
|
|
I think there has been every thing in michael jackson's court but justice!If every body knows he paid millions of $ to settle the previous cases , why close your eyes on the recent charges? We all know he gave alchohol to underage. and 9 more charges . He will be caught one day finally . even if he goes to another country .
|
|
Mike!
By:
Anand ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:40:21 GMT
|
|
The verdict says it all that the process it took was not correct. They had known the past of this woman, who is the mother of this kid. How could they think that they could win!
Sleeping with a kid or younger ones does not mean any think bad.
I would say that this woman had intentions like what she wanted to do just because she agreed to let her son go to the ranch and sleep with Mike! I would say if any one ever takes him to court on this issue again, the parent or the kid is to be blamed as they all know that Mike was pulled to court on this issue earlier multiple times and in spite of knowing that they have allowed their son to be in the Ranch or his bed. I would blame them and not Mike as the intentions are clear.
Let’s get over this for good and leave him alone with his life. There are other major issues surrounding us - let’s concentrate to better the system, rather than spending time over spilt milk.
Attention needed - High school shootings, guns, sniper attacks, terrorist attacks, Iraq, Osama, Global Warming. Media look clear and take us to these, spending time well and worthwhile.
Wish Mike a good health from now on and a speedy recovery so that he can give us what he is good at - good music.
May God Bless America and the World.
Thanks for your time!
|
|
MJ
By:
Rach ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:36:32 GMT
|
|
Wooo he's innocent! I admit he is a bit 'wacko!' but that's just his personality, it doesn't mean he has molested any kid. I think he just wants to hang with the kids because he enjoys being around them, and there ain't nothing wrong with that! Screw all them losers who tried to take advantage for his money! you suk! He is a good man and I would love to meet him.
|
|
harming children
By:
JP in England ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:34:55 GMT
|
|
I do not know whether MJ has sexually assualted children, but he is doing them harm. He is teaching them it is OK to go to bed with an adult who is not a relative. He is teaching his own children that their looks are not acceptable - by having them wear veils in that TV program, and by his abuse of his own body. I feel very concerned for the damage being done to his own children, and do hope someone is looking out for them.
|
|
forgot to add something
By:
sunny ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:07:50 GMT
|
|
You all are complete idiots to keep refering to Gavin as this child as if he is an innocent little lamb. He is a bold faced liar, has been in scam lawsuits before, and was caught in many lies on the witness stand! Gavin is sixteen years old, and was fourteen years old when the supposed abuse took place which it NEVER DID! he made it up and it was proved obviously!
|
|
Just like OJ
By:
Maria ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:06:10 GMT
|
|
The creepy one is guilty. I have personally known victims he's payed off. Well known kids. But, he had the money, honey, and didn't pay the time.
|
|
about patricks slanderous comment
By:
sunny ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:05:23 GMT
|
|
Subject : Molestation
By: Patrick | on : Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:28:43 GMT
Comment :
Patrick, now you are slandering and spreading bold faced lies. there was no video of michael having sex with any underaged child, or any adult for that matter. It sounds like your own sick fantasy, perhaps your a child molester yourself to make up such a disgusting lie like that!
Michael is innocent, it has been proven. I think all of you who have a child molestation phobia ought to go see a shrink yourselves and see why your minds are so perverted and think the dirtiest thoughts!
Thank god I don't live in a country like America, where is your so called freedom? sounds like you still carry on Lynch mobs through your prosecutors and media!
|
|
Susan Yu
By:
Jan ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:58:31 GMT
|
|
Did you read Susan Yu's comment that anyone who actually KNEW Michael would realize that the superstar could NEVER have molested any child. I believe that she sobbed when the verdict was announced because for once justice prevailed.
|
|
I agree with nazcalito's Comment.
By:
Xhris ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:47:57 GMT
|
|
Very well put nazcalito. I agree completely. I think it just hard for some people to believe that Sneddon had a plan from the start. And regardless of what the evidence shows, MJ is guilty to them. They believe the lies and refuse to weigh out the evidence before judging him. Paying money to someone to drop a charge is not admitting guilt. It's preventing months of stress money and BS that anyone would want to avoid. But Sneddon's plan was "Trail by Media". Obviously it got through to some of us. Now who's going to pay back the millions of tax dollars spent on trying to convict him this time? Don't hold your breath waiting for a check from Sneddon.
|
|
Can't win
By:
Alphone Capone ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:24:05 GMT
|
|
A child made a legal complaint that an adult had fondled him. If the state pursues it they're vindictive and hateful.If they do not pursue it they have given into "star power". The stae did its job. The jury did its job. Although, if that were anyone of us on trial we'd be sitting in the slammer right now.
|
|
NEXT: Michael Jackson shares his couch with children
By:
Philosopher ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:22:42 GMT
|
|
But he certainly will share his couch with little boys.
Then there will be a new round of charges.
Haha
|
|
eh. . .
By:
six of one ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:20:05 GMT
|
|
Hmm- am I the only person who was unmoved by this whole trial? Yes, Jackson probably wouldn't've been able to buck the charges if he weren't a multi-millionaire with a crack team of lawyers, but he also probably wouldn't've been targeted for a lawsuit if he hadn't been making big $$$. The whole thing just left a bad taste in my mouth, and hasn't raised anyone's awareness about child victims of molestation-- in fact distracted the public from a lot of other serious cases of human rights abuses that a few people have mentioned here.
|
|
A pedophile convention?
By:
Mike in Sunny Cal ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:12:01 GMT
|
|
In viewing the coverage of the roiling crowd of Jocko fans outside the Santa Maria courthouse, I was absolutely appalled over the sheer number of people that apparently have no objection to adults sleeping with children. It’s too bad the authorities did not have the means to check out the past or current behavior patterns of the people in that screaming mob; I’d be willing to bet that many of them have a predilection towards enjoying sex with minors. If the truth be known, it would look like some kind of pedophile convention. What is going on in what passes for minds in those star-struck idiots?
|
|
wacko jacko
By:
seth ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:11:27 GMT
|
|
He is guilty, period. There is no excuse that I can think of for jacko to be a free man, freak, nut,whatever. The world would be a much better place without him.
|
|
Michael Jackson
By:
Audri ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:03:50 GMT
|
|
This case was a loser for the Advancement of Awareness of Child Molestation no matter what the verdict of the court. Michael Jackson guilty of child molestation? Verdict: child molesters are weirdo freaks; you can tell the bad guys by how they look and act! Michael Jackson not-guilty of child molestation? Verdict: people with money can get away with anything, either/or: see; child molestation doesn't really happen.
|
|
Focus on our problems ((NOT MICHEALS))
By:
sapphire ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:59:52 GMT
|
|
I agree with another user. There are more important things going on in this world. Better off leaving the MJ thing aside for good. And focus on our president and the economy of our future. How can we improve our situation in iraq, at home with families. While our loved ones are out fighting for freedom. No more gossip!! Get a life people. Focus on your problems and the soulutions you can do for them. Have a Blessed day :)
|
|
Michael Jackson
By:
nazcalito ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:45:06 GMT
|
|
The prosecution's case was so bad that I suspect the prosecutor Sneddon's goal was actually to try Jackson in the tabloid press and not in court. An actual guilty verdict would have been a bonus but was not really necessary for his purposes. That is the story that should really be investigated. Instead, we see a campaign among certain members of the media to say that the verdict was wrong and that Jackson was really "guilty." That this is garbage will be obvious to anyone who followed the trial, as I did, and looked at the evidence fairly. Just consider the "low lights":
1. Gavin Arvisio obviously lied during some of his testimony. He even admitted it. He was also under the thrall of a psychotic mother who was kind of a cross between Joan Crawford and the mother in "Gypsy." No reasonable person could have believed any of his testimony.
2. 3 of the four "priors" denied that anything happened. There was no advantage to doing this, especially for Macauley Culkin, whose handlers tried to keep him from testifying at all, fearing that his career might be damaged if he was associated with Jackson. The two Australians were out of subpoena range and couldn't be forced to testify, but they came anyway.
3. The one "prior" who claimed molestation was "locked in" to testifying that way. He'd gotten a huge amount of money in a lawsuit where he claimed molestation. He couldn't have said he wasn't molested after that. He'd be admitting fraud.
4. The fifth "prior", who also got money from a lawsuit, conveniently went on a trip to Europe, apparently so that he couldn't be subpoenaed. Does that suggest something, maybe that he didn't want to have to lie on the witness stand to protect his investment?
|
|
peter pan
By:
Ellen ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:37:29 GMT
|
|
He is a man in a mans body(with all the needs of an adult) that still thinks he is a child. I think in his mind there is nothing wrong with sleeping with another child if you yourself think you are 12.
Time for him to grow up and at like the adult he actually is.
I would also like to know why you would pay millions to a someone that you didn't molest in some way? I think that the last case would have sent him to prison. Too bad that that kid didn't decide to testify against him in this trial.
|
|
Molestation
By:
Patrick ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:28:43 GMT
|
|
As it's been said, the jury found Jackson "not guilty". This by no means is to say that he is innocent. It appears that the prosecution was unable, after many years, to present enough evidence proving actual "molestation",i.e. video of Jackson touching, kissing, sucking, having sex with this particular young boy. Some on the jury announced that they felt "something" happened but without the "tangible" evidence they could not convict, and this is the way the judicial system works. It works this way so that not only do you convict the crook, you hopefully don't convict the innocent. In this case though Jackson admitted on tape/video that his preference is to sleep/play with little boys, no matter how innocent he wishes to explain away this proclivity, and no matter how willing the boy(s) and their parent(s) are to allow this to happen it is fundamentally wrong on so many levels. The children involved are too young to be able to make a decision like that, the parents for what ever reason neglected to act reasonably in their children's interests and Jackson to advantage of this and did what his fame allows him to get away with. Any other individual with less fame/financial rescource that would admit to this type of behavior would most assuredly find themselves behind bars, Jackson's fame certainly played a major role in his verdict, don't ever fool yourselves in to believing otherwise. This is not the same as sleeping with your own child, sibling or best friend as a "sleep over". This was a grown man with enormous fame and fortune that has allowed delusional thinking to make the innapropriate appropriate. Jackson's ranch name is appropriate "Never Land", a mythical land owned by a mythical man that allows mythical behavior. Like O.J., Blake and other guilty famous people that still walk free you can bet in the end they will all be smoking a dog turd in Hell.
|
|
Something stinks alright...
By:
Xhris ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:28:25 GMT
|
|
It all smells foul if you ask me. This can't even be compared to the OJ trial. (OJ Got lucky I think he was at least involved) The District Attorney has openly been going after MJ for a decade. So I'm sure when this opportunity arose, he jumped at it. If at first you don't succeed, Bring up the charges 10 years later. I for one think Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon is a Snake. He found a little boy who had his feelings hurt when he was booted from Nederland, and the Mother, a PROVEN Liar with a history of fraud. It was his perfect little team. He just wasn’t expecting the defense to get the dirt on her. She was so sure this was going to be her big payday, and it would be so easy this time because the whole world remembers the last trial, and would surely believe it "this time". It showed in her testimony. She was confident. She was snapping her fingers at the jury, and acting like she was in control of the trial. That and the fact that the boy’s story didn’t hold water, lost the trail before it even went to the Jury Room. If you haven’t guest already, I don’t believe MJ is a Pedophile. A little strange maybe. But that's what makes him an easy target for accusations like this. He has to change his lifestyle now to protect his self. I guess that means he finally has to grow up mentally. I personally would not let my child sleep in the same bed with an adult that was not immediate family. How ever, Mike is a 12 year old in a Mans body.
My son has 12 year olds sleep over with him all the time. There just not in a body of a man in his 40's. My point is, Mike has to move from 12 to 47 right now. I’m just sorry it took him so long to figure that out.
|
|
Do you have editors?
By:
Gene ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:27:36 GMT
|
|
"Mesereau also said he could understand the public’s willingness to believe all the unfounded accusations against Jackson, because he believed that the pop star was “unquestionably one of the finest human beings I've ever been privileged to know" he said."
Umm... what? Perhaps earthtimes should have an editor actually read the article before publishing it.
|
|
haters
By:
Cheryl Jong ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:18:31 GMT
|
|
My hope is one day you witches and warlocks would get to meet Mr. Jackson and get to realize there does exist someone as kind and loving as he is. His kindness goes beyond anything you could imagine so you can't accept he could be in bed with the kids and nothing more than sleep and boyish horseplay take place. Nothing deviant or sexual. He would never harm a child in any way. Good thing we're not in Salem. Sounds like if any of you were in bed with a child we could certainly expect some molestation to happen. That's pretty much what your warpt minds are saying. I've met the man and worked with him. You people are scary. Don't hate the man because of his goodness and your inability to believe it.
|
|
Jackson
By:
Lisa ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:10:00 GMT
|
|
Either Americans are obsessed with sex or have dirty minds. They can't seem to understand that people can actually be in close proximity to each other without any hanky panky. I grew up in Asia where it's not unusual for half a dozen people to sleep in one room. You spread the bedding wall to wall, go to sleep. And that's it.
If there was something fishy going on in Michael's bedroom than the accuser's mother is equally guilty. After all, she did accept expense Cartier watches, wax jobs an other lavish gifts. That makes her a Pimp.
|
|
Re: After the Verdict, Michael Jackson.
By:
David James ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:09:26 GMT
|
|
Suprised at the verdict? The verdict? You mean the lady who was spending Jackson's money having her legs done and a facial massage in a Solvang Salon chatting on her cell phone while claiming to be kidnapped at "Neverland" where her son was being held and molested by someone she described as a wacko freak who spent gobs of his own money with at least five other co-conspirators to help cure her son of cancer, but who never bothered to tell the prosecution about any of those little details? That verdict? Is anyone really serious? The crime is that the people of Santa Barbara County must now pay for this circus!
|
|
Michael Jackson and prosecutors
By:
Chuck ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:51:30 GMT
|
|
The most dangerous person in the judicial system is the over-zealous prosecutor. Sneddon appears to be just that. From what I read and heard through the media, there was insufficient evidence to convict Michael Jackson. An unbiased District Attorney should have realised that and spared both sides the enormous expense of the trial. What a waste of taxpayer money!As we saw in the O.J. case, a seemingly guilty person went free because of an over-zealous prosecution.As a public official, doesn't a district attorney have a duty to the public to act impartially. The public is entitled to accountability and Sneddon should be held accountable.
|
|
$$$$
By:
Diane in Orlando ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:40:28 GMT
|
|
Just as OJ was found innocent of murdering his beautiful wife, Jackson was also found not guilty of child molestation. What is this country coming to when all it takes is money to get away with whatever you want to be able to do.
|
|
golding opportunity for all jackson family
By:
Jislord ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:38:45 GMT
|
|
Accually not that micheal jackson is innocent of his child molestation case but God just wanted gives him another chances of been him repent and change to the normal way of God. This is another chances for him to utilised the greace left to him this time around. I pray he will learn nowadays. Not only him but all him family mainly his sister janet. This best and gold opportunity for her to learn this God lesson. I pray the wisdom of God should teach them all.
|
|
perversion , spelling & other confusion
By:
m fox ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:36:24 GMT
|
|
first of all whats an ad mitton?we don't need those in florida, since our hands don't get cold. also, does james in australia want to have children in HIS bed?(freak!!!)last but not least should michael jackson be invited to perform at live 8?(so that little african kids can have a safe?place to sleep)
|
|
Michael's Innocence
By:
Anna ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:34:34 GMT
|
|
I have always believed 150% in his innocence. Him saying he will not share his bed with children is not admitting he's guilty. He is just protecting himself from these corrupt minds that can not believe that he is just like a child himself and likes to have childlike fun. I think it stinks that he has been treated this way and I would left my child go to his house it I still had small ones. I am 65 years old. The media is the one that made him look so guilty to the public. Nancy Grace and a few others needs help Not Michael Jackson. Nancy needs to be taken off TV. She is playing with peoples lives and she has no right. Just because her boyfriend was killed does not make everyone she comes in contact that has been accused guilty. Michael you hang in there. There are more people than you know that believe in your innocence. Just the fools that don't have a clue are louder.
We love you Michael
|
|
Race?
By:
Ken in MD ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:29:58 GMT
|
|
Jessie and Al were all set to make an issue (if a guilty verdict was handed down) out of the all-white jury selected to pass judgement. However, it didn't go that way, so they'll have to wait until the next time that the same situation presents itself. Do you think that some recognition could be given to that all-white jury for passing judgement based upon a proponderance of the evidence and not a their racial steriotype given to them by Jessie and Al?
|
|
verdict
By:
vince ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:29:47 GMT
|
|
All you have to do is listen to the jurors’ comments. They did not say that Jackson was innocent; they said that the evidence presented did not support a guilty verdict. Once more so you’re sure to “get it”. They did not say that Jackson was innocent; they said that the evidence presented did not support a guilty verdict. The prosecutor failed to present the case properly. Yes the mother was a greedy flake. Yes the conspiracy charge was “week”, but was needed to allow information about his prior actions to be introduced. To all of you raving about how his ‘sharing his bed with children’ was nothing to worry about: DROP THE B.S. If any “non-celebrity” admitted to sleeping with young boys, they’d be in prison by now. End of story. When anyone else with a history of abuse as a child goes on trial, that abuse is shown as an indicator of the likelihood that they themselves were likely to commit abuse: Why not here? Granted, Jackson has talent, but talent does not equal integrity, let alone innocence. Jacko should be behind bars for a minimum of 5 years, just to wake him up, and the parents that allowed their children to sleep with him should get 10!
|
|
Jacko
By:
Claus ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:18:54 GMT
|
|
I am just glad it's over. There is enough garbage out there daily. We don't need more. Sadly, yet another fat lawyer made a ton of money . I just hope Jacko goes bancrupt and gets a real job and real life to taste.
|
|
wacko jacko
By:
m w fox ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:18:16 GMT
|
|
is it normal to want to share your bed with strange children?if you think so, then jackson is innocent.if not he's a twisted pervert.i hope he goes into hideing soon.anyway, i've finished ranting.now i'm going to log onto anysoldier.com and see if a koran (quran?) will really flush down the crapper. semper fidelis and good plumbing! m fox
|
|
If you or I were accused..
By:
Sherman in St Louis ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:11:36 GMT
|
|
We would already be rotting in prison. The only reason why this was drug out so far is that MJ is a celebrity.
In a country where accusations and the testimony of one person will put you in prison, celebrities will get out of going to prison because of money and pressure on the judges & prosecutors.
I personally know of a case where a STL Rams player killed a person in their car and got off completely of any charges. He had a good lawyer. A friend who had the exact thing happen to them hired the same lawyer, but got 7 years in prison. Goes to show you that things aren't always as they seem and the 'little' people don't have the same chance at justice as the 'big' people.
|
|
Leave the Man alone!
By:
Anatoly ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:09:00 GMT
|
|
Michael is innocent as he always been! Letting kids to sleep in his bed is not the same as sleeping with them! Michael said that he lets them use his bed while sleeps on his mat on the floor. Of course, they play, watch movies like any person would give good time to kids. Is that wrong? Those who had good intentions with Michael testfied that they spent time with him and nothing untoward happened. Why do people focus on the negative information and do not want to see the other side? Is it jelousy of his success or what? Epistemologically speaking, no judgement should be reached without suffient evidence. Stop using Bashir's docummentary (which was edited to deceive the society) as the Gospel truth. Understand him before you judge him!
As for the media, please when it comes to events, inform us what is happening; stop giving us your opinions! KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE!!!
|
|
MJ
By:
sil in bolingbrook ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:44:52 GMT
|
|
If you are a child molester. Why would you admit on public tv that you like to share your bed with children. People that prey children would not be open about where they molest their victims. Mj is a victim of himself.He needs to surround himself with people that's going to be honest with him on how to avoid the pitfalls he keeps running into.
|
|
Jacko
By:
Duh Dottie ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:38:35 GMT
|
|
Dottie: Guilty of what? I don't know about France, but in the U.S. sharing your bed isn't a crime. What stinks is people who make assumptions about what happened when they weren't there.
|
|
Poor Michael
By:
Albert Figdor, Jr. ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:26:34 GMT
|
|
Michael is innocent because he wasn't found guilty. End of case. He should now find a new hobby: collecting medieval works of art and sculptures and maybe postage stamps to keep him out of trouble. That's what I did when I got out of jail.
|
|
well well
By:
Laks ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:21:57 GMT
|
|
I am from Asia, and I am totally surprised to find the US citizens spending such a lot of time discussing and weighing negative and positive points of the Jackson verdict. I just dont understand why americans give a damn to a single celebrity ( that too, more than half of them thinks he is guilty) called Michael Jackson. I have come across news regarding High school shootings, sniper attacks, terrorist attacks, Iraq, Osama, wife swapping, crystal meth addiction among teenagers, young boys sexually molesting other young boys and girls, anorexia, sociopaths on the loose, overflow of unchecked pornography,,rainbow parties, gruesome murders, obesity, prostitution happening in the US... i guess all americans must spend their thoughts, efforts and time to do something about these issues rather than discuss things like "would u allow your kid to sleep with jackson or " how many nose jobs he had, blah blah...
|
|
spelling
By:
lily ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:21:57 GMT
|
|
My understanding, according to my daughter, is that the spelling and poor grammar are more acceptable when typed into the computer. It allows people to write faster and be more natural.
Not capitalizing words that would normally be capitalized is another way to save time.
I'm not comfortable with it, but choose not to judge. Many people have knowledge and wisdom superior to my own. Some of those people are sloppy with grammar, but may well be more highly esteemed in the eyes of God.
|
|
MJ
By:
Jay ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:09:53 GMT
|
|
MJ has not made wise decisions in the past in relation to letting young children sleep in his bed. Even though I do think his intentions were good, it is not something that one would consider normal. With that said, it is important that MJ walks away from this trial knowing that his innocence of sleeping with children is not considered normal behavior of an adolescent man in his forty's especially if the children are not his own.
|
|
Jackson
By:
Reality Bites ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:56:29 GMT
|
|
Having worked with abused teens for years, all I can say to you people who still consider Jackson's actions to be innocent, is that you are deluding yourselves.
Not all pedophiles molest.
Sometimes, being next to a child in an intimate way (ie in bed, without supervision) is enough to satisfy them if they know that were they to try anything else, the fantasy life would stop.
I believe that Jackson got these kids as tired as possible, and/or allowed them access to alcohol, and then abused them whilst they slept. A bit of a fondle, masturbation, whatever - not necessarily penetration.
If you think that Jackson's behaviours are perfectly innocent, then consider very very carefully what is happening in your own world. No wonder so many children are abused under their own parent's so-called watchful eye.
Anyone watching the Bashir documentary could see that the boy had a crush on Jackson, that the physical closeness between them suggested more than 'play pals'.
|
|
MJ
By:
MJ unfan ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:40:46 GMT
|
|
In my opinion and mny others, Michael Jackson whould be guilty, so that he can't do any more harm. He needs to leave or something becasue all he is doing is causing this country, and the people in it pain. MJ should be GUILTY>.
sry for the harshness, but it is true
|
|
who are you to judge him?
By:
sphynx ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:39:49 GMT
|
|
That doesn't mean admission that means "not being in a vulnerable position". The people who doesn't want to belive that he is not guilty, never will. No matter what is said or done.
As for the comment about leaving the country, this guy pays more tax that you will ever do in your life.
Yes it is a matter of money, the crazy woman who wanted to rip him off like she did in the past, lying and saying she was sexually abused by security guards.
Did anyone follow the trial before giving these comments?
|
|
Avoiding the appearance of evil...
By:
Uncle Gator ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:31:16 GMT
|
|
doesn't mean anything for anyone who chooses to do things their own way, no matter what. MJ needs to worry less how he is judged by his peers, and more how he will one day be judged by his own lips. The accusers were a virtual "dream team" of losers that a much less sophisticated lawyer than Mesereau could have won against. By the way - what's with all the infantile misspellings and poor grammar amongst a few of you - didn't you finish school?
|
|
MJ
By:
Janet Shepler ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:30:24 GMT
|
|
Our country is at war, the economy is in the toilet, the national deficit is shameful and W wants to rob social security. Just naming a few. The commenters above should ask themselves, "are we better off now than 8 years ago?" MJ was judged by his peers and found innocent. How about we focus on important issues and leave him alone.
|
|
MJ
By:
CHRISTY ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:29:56 GMT
|
|
AT LAST A MOLESTATION CHARGE HE IS NOT GUILTY OF!!!
|
|
Jacko
By:
Natasha ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:59:10 GMT
|
|
I would not allow my children to be alone with this pig. Any parent who would, should also be charged with child abuse!!!!!!!!!
|
|
love u mj
By:
sam ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:17:40 GMT
|
|
i love mj i was on his side the hole way y do people have 2 tke advantage of people just coz he has money its wrong and its not true he is inocent and i love him to bits i am only 14 and i have loved him since i was born i love the music and the man himself and wod love 2 meet him whos with me i love u mj loads
|
|
Jackson
By:
Rusty ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:11:19 GMT
|
|
I wonder if his legal team or the members of the jury would allow their children/grandchildren to stay with him. As for him changing his ways, I have a better chance of sprouting wings
|
|
Waco Jacko: When are you leaving?
By:
Pete ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:03:21 GMT
|
|
It was reported that Waco Jacko was going to leave this country after the trial. The sooner the better for us all.
|
|
Jacko
By:
David ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:56:25 GMT
|
|
He was himself missused as a child, so it could be possible that he is somewhat attracted by young boys, but who is the boy from 13 who never drunk a beer, or looked at some kind of porn, doesn't mean Jacko molested the child, as the Jury understood well. Case was blown up in unrelated proportion, and personalities as Michael are always victims of unscrupulous people, just remember the old Roman Polansky case, who had to leave the USA.
|
|
mj
By:
brenda ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:56:23 GMT
|
|
I am so tired of hearing how he missed his childhood. Childhood last maybe 12 years at BEST, well, he's made up for those 12 years now (a few times over), so he's had it, now he can GROW UP and start the other part of his life that he hasn't had--acting like a mature adult!
|
|
mj
By:
tolulope olowomeye ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:34:56 GMT
|
|
lets give this much to micheal, he's lived a very very unususal life right from his childhood he's therefore not likely to be like other guys,also people's reaction to childhood experiences differ. his atatchment to young boys though unusual could be innocent. until otherwise proven, he is considered innocent
|
|
Very Clear
By:
Robert ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:29:58 GMT
|
|
It just a matter of money....
|
|
.
By:
jennifer ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:28:15 GMT
|
|
just because he may share his bed with children does not mean that he molests them. i've slept in a bed with my brother, but that does not mean that it's incest.
|
|
Jacko
By:
James in Australia ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:24:42 GMT
|
|
"pop star will never again share his bed with children
Is that an admittion then? So he is guilty then?
The whole thing stinks".
Theres a difference between sharing your bed with a child and molesting them, you know... or maybe you dont.
|
|
re: Jacko
By:
Kay ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:20:33 GMT
|
|
Don`t be silly.
|
|
get a clue
By:
robert antifrogger ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:17:28 GMT
|
|
Is that you're admission then? you're guilty of being retarded then?
next...
|
|
Jacko
By:
Dottie in France ,
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:55:20 GMT
|
|
"pop star will never again share his bed with children"
Is that an admittion then? So he is guilty then?
The whole thing stinks
|
|
|
|
|