India | UK | US

Cage was compulsive spender, says former manager

Posted : Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:04:17 GMT
By : dpa
Category : US (Entertainment)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US Entertainment News | Home
Los Angeles - The former financial manager of actor Nicolas Cage has fired back at the Hollywood movie star, claiming in a lawsuit that Cage was a compulsive spender who ignored all warnings to rein in his lavish lifestyle, People reported Tuesday. Cage sued Samuel Levin last month for 25 million dollars, claiming that the accountant led him on a path to financial ruin that included the foreclosure of many of his houses.

In his countersuit, Levin claimed that from the day he was hired in 2001 he warned Cage to stop outspending his massive paychecks, and that he would need 30 million dollars a year to maintain his lifestyle.

But even when Cage made more than that, such as in 2007, following his hit movie National Treasure, Cage managed to up his spending. According to Levin, the actor bought three properties worth 33 million dollars, in addition to 22 cars and expensive jewelry and art.

Cage "spent huge sums taking his sizable entourage on costly vacations and threw enormous, Gatsby-scale parties at his residences," the lawsuit stated.

Copyright DPA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Cage was compulsive spender, says former manager
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More US (Entertainment) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.