India | UK | US

Sacked Cathay Pacific pilots sue airline over job losses

Hong Kong - Eighteen pilots sacked by Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific during an industrial dispute eight years ago continued their battle for compensation in court Tuesday. The pilots, who were among a group of 49 sacked en-masse in July 2001, are c...
Posted : Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:59:09 GMT
By : dpa
Category : Business
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Business News | Home
Hong Kong - Eighteen pilots sacked by Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific during an industrial dispute eight years ago continued their battle for compensation in court Tuesday. The pilots, who were among a group of 49 sacked en-masse in July 2001, are claiming they were wrongfully terminated and their careers ruined because of damaging comments made about them by airline bosses.

They claim the airline targeted them because of their trade union activities in a long dispute which concerned rostering issues and pay.

They also allege that remarks made by airline bosses, which accused them of disrupting airline operations and besmirching the reputation of Hong Kong, had damaged their professional reputations and careers.

The hearing continues this week in the Court of First Instance with more pilots scheduled to testify.

Copyright DPA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Sacked Cathay Pacific pilots sue airline over job losses
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More Business News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.