Energy | Nature

China: Rich nations should pay for pollution from exports - Summary

Washington - The world's wealthiest nations should pay for China to cut its pollution coming from exports, Chinese officials said Monday amid sensitive talks with the United States on how to reach a new deal to combat global warming. China - the worl...
Posted : Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:05:55 GMT
By : DPA
Category : Environment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Environment News | Home
Washington - The world's wealthiest nations should pay for China to cut its pollution coming from exports, Chinese officials said Monday amid sensitive talks with the United States on how to reach a new deal to combat global warming. China - the world's largest polluter together with the United States - has a plan in place to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming even as its economy grows rapidly, said Li Gao, director of China's department of climate change.

But in a sign of the tough barriers remaining to a new global deal on cutting those emissions, Li said China would hold rich nations responsible for between 15 per cent to 25 per cent of its emissions that come from manufacturing goods made for export.

The cost of reducing those emissions "should be taken by the consumers, but not the producers," Li told a forum by the non- partisan Pew Centre on Global Climate Change. He added that wealthy nations like the US and Japan should "bear in mind the historical responsibility" for causing global warming.

His comments came as China's top climate official, Vice Chairman Xie Zhenhua, met the US' top climate negotiator Todd Stern on Monday in Washington. State Department spokesman Robert Wood called it a "productive meeting" but said the talks marked only "the beginning of the process."

The US and China are considered crucial to the success of any new deal, but Japan's climate envoy - also in Washington for talks - said a global agreement was unlikely to be reached by a December summit in Copenhagen, which has been billed as the final round of talks.

Shinsuke Sugiyama, director general for global issues at Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told the Pew forum it was important to be "realistic" and unlikely that "everything is going to be wrapped up" by the Copenhagen deadline. He still called 2009 a "make or break year" for global climate policy.

Stern also met separately with European environment officials, who have been pushing the US and China for more ambitious targets on tackling global warming.

President Barack Obama has promised to slash greenhouse gas emissions in the United States by about 15 per cent by 2020 and is gearing up for a difficult battle with Congress over a plan to force US companies to pay for their climate-damaging pollution.

But Obama has also said major emerging economies will have to take responsibility for their own growing pollution levels. The United States stayed out of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol largely because it only limited the emissions of advanced economies.

Li noted that China's emissions ranked only 92nd in the world over the last century, and that its per capita emissions were only one- fifth that of the United States.

Copyright DPA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : China: Rich nations should pay for pollution from exports - Summary
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More Environment News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

I didn't say the reactor got a glowing report, I said the report said the reactor was glowing.
 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.