U.S. nuclear regulator nixes air defenses

Posted : Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:22:00 GMT
Author : General News Editor
Category : General
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
General News | Home
WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 that nuclear power plants do not require additional protection from commandeered passenger planes.

The vote was in response to a 2004 petition from a Los Angeles non-profit group, the Committee to Bridge the Gap, the Washington Post reported Tuesday. The committee's president, Daniel Hirsch, argued the country's 103 nuclear facilities were the most likely target for terrorists.

Nuclear power plants are pre-emplaced nuclear weapons near major cities, Hirsch said. They can't blow up like a nuclear bomb, but they can release a thousand times the radiation of the Hiroshima bomb.The NRC said that guarding against airborne attacks was the job of the military and other agencies, and said plant operators were already required to be prepared for fires or explosions, whatever the cause. Chairman Dale Klein also said he was satisfied with research on plant safety.

Nuclear power plants are inherently robust structures that our studies show provide adequate protection in a hypothetical attack by an airplane, Klein said.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : U.S. nuclear regulator nixes air defenses
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More General News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.