Simpson book advance under court scrutiny

Posted : Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:42:00 GMT
By : General News Editor
Category : General
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
General News | Home
SANTA MONICA, Calif., Jan. 20 A California judge has barred O.J. Simpson from pulling any stunts to hide his book deal assets until state and federal courts can sort out the funds.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Gerald Rosenberg Friday temporarily barred Simpson, who was found responsible by a civil jury in 1997 of killing Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, from hiding, transferring or liquidating income pending a Feb. 20 hearing, the New York Daily News said. Simpson's attorney Ronald Slates says his client is willing to make a deal with Goldman and give him a percentage of his future earnings if he will stop dogging his every dime. But Goldman says there is no way in hell he would ever enter into any kind of agreement with Simpson. He belongs on a gurney with a needle in his arm to end his life, Goldman told the Daily News. Goldman is trying to collect on the civil verdict that ordered Simpson to pony up $33.5 million to his victims' families; Simpson was acquitted of the slayings. Simpson came into a reported $700,000 from his canceled book, If I Did It.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Simpson book advance under court scrutiny
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More General News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.